Abstract
In the eyes of the (Labour) politicians who have most seriously pursued it, educational reform has had two aspects: the equalising of opportunity and the weakening of ‘class privilege’ in the education system. These goals have not been seen to depend upon a socialist transformation of society, but have most often been pursued as part of an attempt to modernise education, in response to national economic need. Thus, Antony Crosland, Secretary of State in the mid-1960s, advocated the ending of the public-school system and promoted wide-scale comprehensive reorganisation. Similarly, in the 1980s, Neil Kinnock has called for education to be a ‘finger in the fist of progress’ represented by the industrial policy of a future Labour Government, and has argued for the extension of the comprehensive principle to post-16 education and, again, for measures that would severely curtail public-school education. Each of these views identifies a ‘class bias’ in the English schools which prevents modernisation, promotes injustice and hinders industrial adaptability. However, it is plain that Crosland was not successful in eradicating or mitigating this bias, and it is not at all clear that Kinnock’s line of march is leading to a happier destination. Reformers of the school have tended to underestimate the intractability of the problem.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
J. Westergaard and H. Resler, Class in a Capitalist Society (Penguin, 1976), p. 321.
M. Barrett, Women’s Oppression Today (New Left Books, 1980), p. 146.
West Indian Children in Our Schools, Interim Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Education of Children from Ethnic Minority Groups (The Rampton Report) (HMSO, 1981), p. 52.
DES, Primary Education in England (HMSO, 1978), pp. 49, 54, 58, 73.
Ibid, p. vii.
Ibid, p. 71.
See West Indian Children in Our Schools, ch. 2.
Barrett, Women’s Oppression Today, p. 141.
A. Gramsci, ‘In Search of the Educational Principle’, in Selections from the Prison Notebooks, ed. Q. Hoare and G. Nowell Smith (Lawrence & Wishart, 1971), p. 36.
P. Kellner, ‘Impossible Dream of a Private School Ban’, New Statesman, 17 April 1981.
A. Hopkins, The School Debate (Penguin, 1978), p. 23.
DES, Mixed Ability Work in Comprehensive Schools, p. 11.
Simon, The Politics of Educational Reform.
Ministry of Education, 15 to 18 (The Crowther Report) (HMSO, 1959), p. 449.
For a critique of the concept of semi-skilled labour, see H. Braverman, Labour and Monopoly Capital (Monthly Review Press, 1974).
OECD, Educational Development Strategy in England and Wales (OECD, 1975), p. 34.
DES Paper to Prime Minister, School Education in England: Problems and Initiatives (restricted circulation, DES, 1976), p. 10.
Board of Education, The Teaching of English in England (The Newbolt Report, 1921),
quoted in M. Mathieson, The Preachers of Culture (Unwin, 1975), p. 74.
OECD, Educational Development Strategy, p. 34.
Copyright information
© 1983 Ken Jones
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jones, K. (1983). The limits of reform. In: Beyond Progressive Education. Crisis Points series. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17068-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17068-5_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-30740-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-17068-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)