Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Themes in Comparative History

  • 11 Accesses

Abstract

In the middle of the eighteenth century, Europe’s absolutist rulers, seeking a model police force, looked to France. Paris appeared the best-policed city in Europe; one Lieutenant of the Paris police allegedly boasted that when three persons gathered for a conversation, one of them was sure to be his agent. Englishmen, with notions of liberty which they maintained set them apart from most people in continental Europe, regarded the French system with horror; the last thing they wanted were the ‘spies’ of the Paris Lieutenant, or the militarised, mounted policemen who patrolled provincial French roads. In 1829, however, the Metropolitan Police were established in London; ostentatiously this was a civilian force, unarmed, uniformed in top hat and tails, and with orders to prevent crime. Coincidentally a uniformed civilian police, the sergents de ville, also took to the streets of Paris in 1829. Twenty five years later, when Napoleon III sought to improve the Paris police, he looked to the Metropolitan Police of London. So too did other police reformers, whether in autocratic Berlin or democratic New York. By the middle of the nineteenth century the model police force was that of London. A neat reversal of roles appears to have taken place between England and France in the space of a century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. P. Martin and Gail Wilson, The Police: A Study in Manpower (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  2. ‘It’s a fair cop’, Guardian, 17 May 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Quotations from Sir Charles Reith, The Police Idea (1938) pp. 5 and 177; British Police and the Democratic Ideal (1943) pp. 1 and 3; The Blind Eye of History (1952) p. 163.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cyril D. Robinson, ‘Ideology as History: A Look at the Way Some English Police Historians Look at the Police’, Police Studies, 11 (1979) 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marcel Le Clère, Histoire de la Police (4th edn, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jacques Aubert, Michel Eude, Claude Goyard et al., L’Etat et sa Police en France (1789–1914) (Geneva, 1979) pp. 2 and 4.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Allan Silver, ‘The Demand for Order in Civil Society: A Review of Some Themes in the History of Urban Crime, Police and Riot’, in D.J. Bordau (ed.), The Police: Six Sociological Essays (New York, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Allan E. Levett, ‘Centralization of City Police in the Nineteenth-Century United States’, Ph.D., University of Michigan, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Robert D. Storch, ‘The Policeman as Domestic Missionary: Urban Discipline and Popular Culture in Northern England, 1850–1880’, Journal of Social History (Summer, 1976) 481–509; ‘The Plague of the Blue Locusts: Police Reform and Popular Resistance in Northern England, 1840–1857’, International Review of Social History, XX (1975) 61–90.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Modern Prison (1977) esp. pp. 214–15.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Michael Ignatieff, A Just Measure of Pain: the Penitentiary in the Industrial Revolution 1750–1850 (1978) esp. pp. 185, 189–90 and 192–3.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Ignatieff concludes his book with a criticism of Foucault’s determinism; for a sustained criticism of Ignatieff’s determinism see Thomas Laqueur’s review of A Just Measure of Pain in Social History (1981) 384–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1983 Clive Emsley

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Emsley, C. (1983). Introduction. In: Policing and its Context 1750–1870. Themes in Comparative History. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17043-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics