Abstract
In the middle of the eighteenth century, Europe’s absolutist rulers, seeking a model police force, looked to France. Paris appeared the best-policed city in Europe; one Lieutenant of the Paris police allegedly boasted that when three persons gathered for a conversation, one of them was sure to be his agent. Englishmen, with notions of liberty which they maintained set them apart from most people in continental Europe, regarded the French system with horror; the last thing they wanted were the ‘spies’ of the Paris Lieutenant, or the militarised, mounted policemen who patrolled provincial French roads. In 1829, however, the Metropolitan Police were established in London; ostentatiously this was a civilian force, unarmed, uniformed in top hat and tails, and with orders to prevent crime. Coincidentally a uniformed civilian police, the sergents de ville, also took to the streets of Paris in 1829. Twenty five years later, when Napoleon III sought to improve the Paris police, he looked to the Metropolitan Police of London. So too did other police reformers, whether in autocratic Berlin or democratic New York. By the middle of the nineteenth century the model police force was that of London. A neat reversal of roles appears to have taken place between England and France in the space of a century.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
J. P. Martin and Gail Wilson, The Police: A Study in Manpower (1969).
‘It’s a fair cop’, Guardian, 17 May 1980.
Quotations from Sir Charles Reith, The Police Idea (1938) pp. 5 and 177; British Police and the Democratic Ideal (1943) pp. 1 and 3; The Blind Eye of History (1952) p. 163.
Cyril D. Robinson, ‘Ideology as History: A Look at the Way Some English Police Historians Look at the Police’, Police Studies, 11 (1979) 35–49.
Marcel Le Clère, Histoire de la Police (4th edn, 1973).
Jacques Aubert, Michel Eude, Claude Goyard et al., L’Etat et sa Police en France (1789–1914) (Geneva, 1979) pp. 2 and 4.
Allan Silver, ‘The Demand for Order in Civil Society: A Review of Some Themes in the History of Urban Crime, Police and Riot’, in D.J. Bordau (ed.), The Police: Six Sociological Essays (New York, 1967).
Allan E. Levett, ‘Centralization of City Police in the Nineteenth-Century United States’, Ph.D., University of Michigan, 1975.
Robert D. Storch, ‘The Policeman as Domestic Missionary: Urban Discipline and Popular Culture in Northern England, 1850–1880’, Journal of Social History (Summer, 1976) 481–509; ‘The Plague of the Blue Locusts: Police Reform and Popular Resistance in Northern England, 1840–1857’, International Review of Social History, XX (1975) 61–90.
Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Modern Prison (1977) esp. pp. 214–15.
Michael Ignatieff, A Just Measure of Pain: the Penitentiary in the Industrial Revolution 1750–1850 (1978) esp. pp. 185, 189–90 and 192–3.
Ignatieff concludes his book with a criticism of Foucault’s determinism; for a sustained criticism of Ignatieff’s determinism see Thomas Laqueur’s review of A Just Measure of Pain in Social History (1981) 384–6.
Copyright information
© 1983 Clive Emsley
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Emsley, C. (1983). Introduction. In: Policing and its Context 1750–1870. Themes in Comparative History. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17043-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17043-2_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-28895-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-17043-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)