Abstract
The dominions whose status was defined in the Balfour Report and whose names were listed in section I of the Statute of Westminster were predominantly European in respect of their population and wholly European in respect of their government. There were minorities of non-European origin in Australia, in Canada and in New Zealand; there was a large non-European majority in the Union of South Africa. But neither minorities nor majority were in a position to exert a decisive influence upon government. In Canada and even in South Africa it was the cultural tensions between peoples of European stock that hitherto had exercised a formative influence upon national policy, and possibly for that reason it was in the past by no means unknown, however much discountenanced by Canadian scholars, for the term ‘race’ to be applied to relations between English and French-speaking Canadians, while on the lips of South African politicians the terms ‘race’ and ‘racial’, until recent times, customarily referred to relations between British and Afrikaners.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See his speech of March 1954 at the opening of the Fifth (unofficial) Commonwealth Relations Conference at Lahore as reprinted in N. Mansergh, The Multi-Racial Commonwealth, London, 1955, p. 144.
J. A. Hobson, Imperialism: A Study, (3rd ed.), London, 1938, p. 51.
S. Gopal, British Policy in India 1858–1905, Cambridge, 1965, p. 261.
Hansard, Parl. Deb., (Commons), Third series, vol. cccxlii (1890), col. 93.
Hansard, Parl. Deb., (Lords), 4th series, vol. 198, col. 1985.
Hansard, Parl. Deb., (Lords), 4th series, vol. 198, col. 1985. See also John, Viscount Morley, Recollections, (2 vols), London, 1917, vol. 2, pp. 172–3.
Cf., Mansergh and Moon (eds), India. The Transfer of Power 1942–47, London, H.M.S.O. 1970-, vol. V, no. 256, vol. VII, no. 123 and Vol. x, no. 382.
The Indian Councils Act 1861, 24 and 25 Vict., c. 67, reprinted C. H. Philips, The Evolution of India and Pakistan 1858–1947: Select Documents, London, 1962, pp. 35–8.
Cf., R. B. McDowell, The Irish Administration, London, 1964, p. 61, and chapter 2 generally.
Philip Woodruff, The Men Who Ruled India, (2 vols), London, 1954, vol. 1, The Founders; vol. 2, The Guardians.,
H. A. L. Fisher, James Bryce, (2 vols), London, 1927, vol. 1, pp. 259–60. The letter was to his mother and dated 20 November 1888.
K. M. Panikkar, Asia and Western Dominance, London, 1953, p. 16.
R. C. Dutt, letter to Gokhale, 24 May 1906, quoted in B. R. Nanda, Gokhale. The Indian Moderates and the British Raj, OUP, Delhi, 1977.
Reprinted in Sir M. Gwyer and A. Appadorai, Speeches and Documents on the Indian Constitution 1921–47, (2 vols), Bombay, 1957, vol. 1, p. 220.
On the second point see R. J. Moore, The Crisis of Indian Unity 1917–1940, Oxford, 1974, p. 316.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1982 Nicholas Mansergh
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mansergh, N. (1982). India: an Uncertain Goal. In: The Commonwealth Experience. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16952-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16952-8_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-33161-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-16952-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)