Skip to main content

Danton’s Death

  • Chapter
Georg Büchner

Part of the book series: Macmillan Modern Dramatists

  • 23 Accesses

Abstract

Danton’s Death must be the most remarkable first play in European culture. Until January 1835 there is no evidence that Büchner had ever tried his hand at the theatre, no history of family theatrical entertainments, no puppet shows like those staged by the boy Goethe. Yet in the space of five weeks Büchner wrote a play that, especially since the great production by Max Reinhardt in 1916, has become a classic of the German theatre and is seldom out of the repertoire of at least one major company. In its day the work won him little recognition: some thought he had merely edited his main source, Auguste Thiers’ Histoire de la Révolution Francaise (1823–27), into actable form; others, especially the Darmstadt middle class, were shocked and disgusted by the play’s obscenity and common language. The play certainly is blunt, but only, as Büchner argued, because its historical counterparts were blunt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. There is a useful summary of material on Danton relevant to the play in Georg Büchner Dantons Tod: Erläuterungen und Dokumente, ed. Josef Jansen (Reclam UB 8104) (Stuttgart 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goethe, Campagne in Frankreich (1822) Werke, x, p. 235.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The translation is from the Everyman edition (1963) p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Quoted in Hans-Martin Sass, Feuerbach (1978) p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sass, Feuerbach, p. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Thought is in its original form merely a dialogue between me and another. Question and answer are the first factors of thought.’ Quoted Sass, Feuerbach, p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lehmann II, p 443.

    Google Scholar 

  8. In Hessian dialect Büchner’s name would have been pronounced like Georges in French.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lehmann II, p. 292.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hans Mayer, Georg Büchner und Seine Zeit, pp. 182ff.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Printed in the Allgemeine Zeitung, 5 Sept. 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Printed in the Darmstadter Echo of that date.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Karl-Heinz Bohrer wrote an excellent, though highly critical review of this production on 25 April 1978 in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lehmann II, pp. 425–6. This use of ‘must’ is also a conscious echo of Hegel in Philosophie der Geschichte and the theory of a ‘necessary’ progress to world history.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1982 Julian Hilton

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hilton, J. (1982). Danton’s Death. In: Georg Büchner. Macmillan Modern Dramatists. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16737-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics