Skip to main content

Technology Policy and Industrial Strategy

  • Chapter
The Economics of Technological Progress
  • 10 Accesses

Abstract

To some people, the title of this paper may seem pure metaphysics, at least in the British context, which is the one I propose to examine. Many senior British civil servants would claim that they do not know what a technology policy is; and several of them have denied to me, in private at least, that Britain has an industrial strategy. However, two reasons persuade me that the issues are real ones. Firstly, the absence of positive and concerted policy measures does not mean that there is no policy—for just as laissez-faire is a policy2 so too is the system that Christopher Freeman (1974) has called laissez-innover. In any case, the British government has spent very great sums of money on technology, in terms of technical education and support for R and D. Hence the issue is not whether there is or was a policy, but rather whether it has been consistent and effective. Secondly, I feel the issues are legitimate because the problems that these policies are concerned with are increasing in importance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Discussion References

  • Amann, R., Cooper, J. and Davies, R. W.. The Technological Level of Soviet Industry (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J., ‘The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing’, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. XXIX (June 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, D. L., ‘Recent Trends in Research and Development Expenditures in the UK’, Research Policy (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C., ‘The Distribution of Scientific Effort’, Minerva, Vol. 1 (1963), pp. 172–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist ‘Research and Government’ (29 July 1978a).

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist ‘The Science Olympics’, Business Brief (20 May 1978b).

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist ‘Debugging Pesticides’, Business Brief (30 October 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C., The Economics of Industrial Innovation (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, C., ‘R and D: Status Symbol or a Business Tool?’, Plastics and Rubber Weekly (24 May 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Economic Committee, Soviet Economy in a New Perspective (Washington, DC: US Congress, 14 October 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, C. M., ‘The Role of Government Research Establishments’, Chemistry and Industry (18 August 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K., ‘The Choice of Targets and Instruments for Government Support of Scientific Research’, in A. Whiting (ed.), The Economics of Industrial Subsidies (London: Department of Industry, HMSO, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, M. J., ‘Science and Technology’, in R. E. Caves (ed.), Britains Economic Prospects (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M., ‘The Republic of Science’, Minerva, Vol. 1 (1962), pp. 54–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N., Scientific Progress: A Philosophical Essay on the Economics of Research in Natural Science (Oxford: Blackwell, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sands, B. F., Research Management, Vol. XVI, No. 3 (May 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, J. R., ‘The Distribution of Scientific Manpower’, in B. R. Williams (ed.), Science and Technology in Economic Growth (London: Macmillan, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmookler, J., Invention and Economic Growth (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1966).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Science Policy Research Unit, Success and Failure in Industrial Innovation (London: Centre for the Study of Industrial Innovation, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheinin, Y., Science Policy: Problems and Trends (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, P., ‘Technology Policy and Industrial Strategy’, Proceedings of the Conference on Technical Change, Umeh, Sweden (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. T. and Silberston, Z. A., The Economic Impact of the Patent System (London: Cambridge University Press, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S., ‘The Complexity of Scientific Choice’, Minerva, Vol. 2 (1964), pp. 343–54 and Vol. 4 (1966), pp. 155–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, A. M., ‘Criteria for Scientific Choice’, Minerva, Vol. 1 (1963), pp. 159–71 and Vol. 3 (1964), pp. 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilczynski, J., Technology in Comecon (London: Macmillan, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wills, G., Technological Forecasting (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, J., Die Volkswirtschaft der Gegenwart und Zukunft (Leipzig, 1912).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1980 Tönu Puu and Sören Wibe

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stubbs, P.C. (1980). Technology Policy and Industrial Strategy. In: Puu, T., Wibe, S. (eds) The Economics of Technological Progress. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16446-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics