Abstract
The main surprise, and disappointment, for many people in tb choice of a successor to Polaris was that it is to be another ballistic missile rather than a cruise missile. The cruise missile is a pilotless aircraft with continuous propulsion, the descendant of the V-1 ‘buzz’ bomb. Of Hitler’s two ‘revenge’ weapons, the comparatively unsophisticated V-1 was less expensive and therefor more efficient than the complicated V-2 ballistic missile. The V-2 could penetrate defences much more easily, but each missile was enormously expensive. Nevertheless, it was the progeny of the V-2 that came to occupy the central place in the arsenals of the super-powers after the war.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
James Bellini and Geoffrey Pattie, A New World Role for the Medium Power (London: Royal United Services Institute, 1977).
Desmond Ball, ‘The Costs of Cruise Missiles’, Survival, vol. XX, no. 6 (November/December 1978), p. 245.
David Owen, The Politics of Defence (London: Jonathan Cape, 1972) p. 186.
Copyright information
© 1980 Royal Institute of International Affairs
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Freedman, L. (1980). Cruise Missiles versus Ballistic Missiles. In: Britain and Nuclear Weapons. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16388-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16388-5_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-30511-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-16388-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)