Abstract
The Tempest has a special place in Shakespeare’s work: not only his last complete play, but also his shortest; one of the handful he wrote which seem to obey the classical unities; one of the few for which there is no known literary source; and (the significance of this we can only guess at) given pride of place by Heminge and Condell at the front of the First Folio. For all the admiration it has received, it is not a play that one instinctively warms to. The enchanted island resists any easy identification with our own familiar world. The play’s appeal lies both in the sense of wonder induced by its strangeness, its otherness, and, at a rather different level, in the fact that it has always been something of a challenge for critics. The play is an enigma, seeming both to contain Meaning, of a kind conceivably more significant than that of Shakespeare’s previous plays, and yet refusing to disclose what that meaning is. The Tempest may not have produced the greatest amount of critical disagreement of all the plays; there are too many candidates vying for that particular honour. But it can probably lay claim to have inspired the greatest number of really daft interpretations.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
E. E. Stoll, ‘The Tempest’, Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, XLVII (1932) 6
Colin Still, The Timeless Theme (1936); John Vyvyan, The Shakespearean Ethic (1959); J. E. Philips, ‘The Tempest and the Renaissance Idea of Man’, Shakespeare Quarterly, XV (1964) 147–59
F. D. Hoeniger, ‘Prospero’s Storm and Miracle’, Shakespeare Quarterly, VII (1956)
C. J. Sisson, ‘The Magic of Prospero’, Shakespeare Survey 11 (Cambridge, 1958) p. 76.
W. Rockett, ‘Labor and Virtue in The Tempest’, Shakespeare Quarterly, XXIV (1973) 77.
Robert Egan, Drama Within Drama (New York, 1975). The view was first advanced, to my knowledge, in K. M. Abenheimer, ‘Shakespeare’s Tempest: A Psychological Analysis’, Psycho-Analytic Review, XXXIII (1946) 399–415.
Copyright information
© 1980 Raymond Powell
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Powell, R. (1980). The Tempest. In: Shakespeare and the Critics’ Debate. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16362-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16362-5_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-27667-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-16362-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)