Skip to main content
  • 7 Accesses

Abstract

The democratic process in India has followed a political sequence of its own. Given the problem of hierarchy, vast income disparity, traditional attitude to authority, and above all uncrystallised party organisations, her sequential political response has registered the following priorities: the need to build a secular and uninhibited political participation across the ethnic and religious divide; the need to make all strata of society aware of the possible instrumental use of such participation; and finally, the need to build party organisations which will work towards the realisation of its goals rather than perform managerial functions only.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Jayaprakash Narayan, ‘Testament of Protest’ Far Eastern Economic Review, (20 February 1976) p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. H. Morris Jones, Parliament in India ( London: Longmans Green, 1957 ) pp. 167–75.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1979 A. H. Somjee

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Somjee, A.H. (1979). Conclusion. In: The Democratic Process in a Developing Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16158-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics