Abstract
Although many criticisms have been made of the Sociology of Development, these have either focused on the work of particular theorists or on the limitations of its more dubious notions. There has, as yet, been no attempt to provide an overall critique of its theoretical framework, to show why its conclusions are necessarily limited due to the basic concepts operative in its discourse. Thus, whilst critics have, for example, outlined the errors of notions such as Levy’s ‘relatively less modernised societies’, of Eisenstadt’s ‘modernisation’, of Smelser’s concept of ‘differentiation’, or of Bellah’s and Hoselitz’s use of Parsons’ ‘pattern variables’, they have failed to specify the theoretical foundations of such notions. Yet, unless we can analyse why the inadequacies of such concepts result from a set of limited notions being continually reproduced in varying conceptual forms, we cannot have any rigorous basis for assessing the explanatory limitations of the Sociology of Development as a whole. In the present situation, where the analytical field of the structure and development of Third World societies is dominated by a theoretical conflict between the discourses of ‘Development’ and ‘Underdevelopment’, it is vital that we direct our criticisms at the level of their basic concepts. Rather than assessing the validity of particular texts, we should be asking to what extent these theories can generate a framework in which the structure and development of Third World societies can be rigorously analysed.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
R. Dahrendorf, Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society, R.K.P., London (1957).
J. Rex, Key Problems in Sociological Theory, R.K.P., London, 1961.
D. Lockwood, ‘Social Integration and System Integration’ in Explorations in Social Change, ed. G. K. Zollschan and W. Hirsch, R.K.P., London, 1964.
T. Parsons, The Social System, Chapter X, R.K.P., London, 1951.
Barrington Moore Jr., (Ed.,) ‘The New Scholasticism and the Study of Politics’ in Political Power and Social Theory: Seven Studies Harper and Row, 1965.
D. Foss, ‘The world view of Talcott Parsons’, in M. Stein and A. Vidich, Sociology on Trial, Prentice-Hall, 1963.
C. Wright Mills, The Sociological Imagination, Oxford University Press, New York, 1959.
T. Parsons, The Structure of Social Action, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1948, pp. 728–30
E. Devereux, Jr., ‘Parsons Sociological Theory’ in M. Black, The Social Theories of Talcott Parsons, Prentice-Hall, 1961.
See G. Rocher, Talcott Parsons and American Sociology, Nelson, 1974.
L. Althusser, Reading Capital, New Left Books, London, 1970, p. 39.
L. Robbins, An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, London 1932.
O. Lange, Political Economy, Vol. I, Pergamon Press, 1963
M. Godelier, Rationality and Irrationality in Economics, New Left Books, London, 1972.
T. Parsons, Towards a General Theory of Action, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1951, p. 88.
C. Hempel, ‘The Logic of Functional Analysis’ in L. Gross, Symposium on Sociological Theory, Harper and Row, New York, 1959.
R. K. Merton, Social Theory and Social Structure, Free Press, 1957.
T. Parsons, Societies, Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives, Prentice Hall, 1966, p. 16.
T. Parsons, ‘Some Considerations on the Theory of Social Change’, Rural Sociology, Vol. 26, No. 3, September 1961, p. 192.
A. D. Smith, The Concept of social Change, R.K.P., London, 1973, p. 17.
T. Parsons, Sociological Theory and Modern Society, The Free Press, New York, 1967.
Particularly, N. J. Smelser, ‘Mechanisms of Change and Adjustment to Change’ in B. F. Hoselitz, and W. E. Moore, Industrialisation and Society, Mouton, The Hague, 1963.
B. F. Hoselitz, Sociological Factors in Economic Development, Free Press, 1960.
A. G. Frank, ‘The Sociology of Development and Underdevelopment of Sociology’ in Latin America: Underdevelopment or Revolution, Monthly Review Press, 1969.
D. McClelland, The Achieving Society, Princeton, Von Nostrand, 1961, p. 205.
D. McClelland, ‘Motivational Patterns in S.E. Asia with Special Reference to the Chinese Case’, Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 29, No. 1, January 1963.
J. S. Gusfield, ‘Tradition and Modernity’ in The American Journal of Sociology, 1972.
M. J. Levy, Modernisation and the Structure of Societies, Princeton University Press, 1966.
Copyright information
© 1979 John G. Taylor
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Taylor, J.G. (1979). The Sociology of Development: Theoretical Inadequacies. In: From Modernization to Modes of Production. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16156-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16156-0_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-24449-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-16156-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)