Skip to main content

The Identity, Adjustment and Achievement of Transracially Adopted Children: a Review and Empirical Report

  • Chapter
Race, Education and Identity

Abstract

Why should adoption of ‘mixed-race’ children be a social issue of some concern to professionals, and for the black and white communities involved? The reason, as Michael Banton makes clear in a paper earlier in this volume, is that the concept of race is a salient force in British society. In form and intensity, the salience of race differs between Britain and America, but in both cultures the idea of adoption by parents of a child who is of different ‘race’ to them is a controversial issue. Adoption — the process by which a child is permanently cared for by parents other than those he was born to — is a widespread practice in many cultures (Goody, 1969). It is very natural activity. There are no intrinsic reasons why adoption should lead to adverse consequences — such as identity crises-in adopted children. The commonest form of adoption is, in fact, that in which a child is brought up by members of his kinship or clan structure.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1979 Gajendra K. Verma and Christopher Bagley

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bagley, C., Young, L. (1979). The Identity, Adjustment and Achievement of Transracially Adopted Children: a Review and Empirical Report. In: Verma, G.K., Bagley, C. (eds) Race, Education and Identity. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16037-2_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics