Abstract
Although the educational élite is undeniably split in its conception of what higher education is, or should be, about, it is another question altogether whether this has any significant de-stabilising functions for the system as a whole. Intra-class conflict of this nature may be a periodic necessity endured by the élite as it shifts its posture towards a changing environment, while at the same time resting assured of ongoing support mechanisms. On the other hand, an emergent educational ideology may serve to undermine the efficacy of these mechanisms in a too hasty redefinition of élite needs. There is little doubt that many of the upholders of the traditional university ideal were wary of the expansionist implications of the manpower planning approach to higher education for precisely this reason. The Niblett Report, for example, was as we have shown expressly concerned with the desirability of keeping a close rein on the students from non-university backgrounds.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
D.E.S., A Plan for Polytechnics and Other Colleges (H.M.S.O., 1966).
E. Robinson, The New Polytechnics (Cornmarket Press, 1968) p. 10.
See for example, L. Donaldson, ‘Social Class and the Polytechnics’, Higher Education Review, vol. 4 (1971) pp. 44–68.
S. F. Cotgrove, Technical Education and Social Change (Allen and Unwin, 1958 ) p. 115.
D. V. Glass (ed.), Social Mobility in Britain (Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1954 ) p. 306.
The Report stated that the main objects of the Open University were, ‘To provide opportunities, at both undergraduate and postgraduate level, of higher education to all those who, for any reason, have been or are being precluded from achieving their aims through an existing institute of higher education’ quoted by N. E. McIntosh and A. Woodley, ‘The Open University and Second Chance Education — An Analysis of the Social and Educational Background of Open University Students’, Paedagogica Europaea, vol. 9 (1974) p. 85.
N. E. McIntosh and V. Morrison, ‘Student Demand, Progress and Withdrawal’, Higher Education Review, vol. 7 (1974) p. 45.
J. Pratt, ‘Open, University!’, Higher Education Review, vol. 3 (1971) p. 20.
D. Hutchison and A. McPherson, ‘Competing Inequalities: The Sex and Social Class Structure of the First Year Scottish University Population 1962–1972’, Sociology vol. 10 (1976) table 3, p. 113. The 1972 figures were weighted by known population values to reduce response bias in terms of sex, achievement, and age.
The sources for this table are: J. Abbott, Students in a Class Society (Pergamon, 1970) and ‘Students’ Social Class in Three Northern Universities’, British Journal of Sociology, vol. 16 (1965) pp. 206–20;
T. Blackstone, Students in Conflict, L.S.E. in 1967 (Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1970);
M. Jahoda, The Education of Technologists (Tavistock, 1963 );
P. Marris, The Experience of Higher Education (Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1964 );
D. Marsland, quoted in Blackstone, Students in Conflict p. 21; F. Musgrove et al., Preliminary Studies of a Technological University (Bradford University, 1967) mimeographed;
H. Perkins, Innovation in Higher Education—New Universities in the United Kingdom (UNESCO, 1966 );
and F. Zweig, The Student in an Age of Anxiety (Heinemann, 1963 ).
The sources for this table are: J. Crutchley, J. Young, J. Grant, J. Gregory, B. Salter, Student Culture (SSRC Research Report, 1972) (This data in fact comes from a survey of Enfield College students, which since 1972 has been a part of Middlesex Polytechnic); and Pratt and Burgess, Polytechnics p. 86.
Copyright information
© 1978 Ted Tapper and Brian Salter
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tapper, T., Salter, B. (1978). Social Stratification in Higher Education: the Preservation of Traditional Patterns. In: Education and the Political Order. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15873-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15873-7_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-22692-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-15873-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)