Skip to main content

Social Stratification in Higher Education: the Preservation of Traditional Patterns

  • Chapter
Education and the Political Order
  • 16 Accesses

Abstract

Although the educational élite is undeniably split in its conception of what higher education is, or should be, about, it is another question altogether whether this has any significant de-stabilising functions for the system as a whole. Intra-class conflict of this nature may be a periodic necessity endured by the élite as it shifts its posture towards a changing environment, while at the same time resting assured of ongoing support mechanisms. On the other hand, an emergent educational ideology may serve to undermine the efficacy of these mechanisms in a too hasty redefinition of élite needs. There is little doubt that many of the upholders of the traditional university ideal were wary of the expansionist implications of the manpower planning approach to higher education for precisely this reason. The Niblett Report, for example, was as we have shown expressly concerned with the desirability of keeping a close rein on the students from non-university backgrounds.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 14.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. D.E.S., A Plan for Polytechnics and Other Colleges (H.M.S.O., 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Robinson, The New Polytechnics (Cornmarket Press, 1968) p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See for example, L. Donaldson, ‘Social Class and the Polytechnics’, Higher Education Review, vol. 4 (1971) pp. 44–68.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. F. Cotgrove, Technical Education and Social Change (Allen and Unwin, 1958 ) p. 115.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. V. Glass (ed.), Social Mobility in Britain (Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1954 ) p. 306.

    Google Scholar 

  6. The Report stated that the main objects of the Open University were, ‘To provide opportunities, at both undergraduate and postgraduate level, of higher education to all those who, for any reason, have been or are being precluded from achieving their aims through an existing institute of higher education’ quoted by N. E. McIntosh and A. Woodley, ‘The Open University and Second Chance Education — An Analysis of the Social and Educational Background of Open University Students’, Paedagogica Europaea, vol. 9 (1974) p. 85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. N. E. McIntosh and V. Morrison, ‘Student Demand, Progress and Withdrawal’, Higher Education Review, vol. 7 (1974) p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Pratt, ‘Open, University!’, Higher Education Review, vol. 3 (1971) p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Hutchison and A. McPherson, ‘Competing Inequalities: The Sex and Social Class Structure of the First Year Scottish University Population 1962–1972’, Sociology vol. 10 (1976) table 3, p. 113. The 1972 figures were weighted by known population values to reduce response bias in terms of sex, achievement, and age.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. The sources for this table are: J. Abbott, Students in a Class Society (Pergamon, 1970) and ‘Students’ Social Class in Three Northern Universities’, British Journal of Sociology, vol. 16 (1965) pp. 206–20;

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. Blackstone, Students in Conflict, L.S.E. in 1967 (Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1970);

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Jahoda, The Education of Technologists (Tavistock, 1963 );

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Marris, The Experience of Higher Education (Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1964 );

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. Marsland, quoted in Blackstone, Students in Conflict p. 21; F. Musgrove et al., Preliminary Studies of a Technological University (Bradford University, 1967) mimeographed;

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. Perkins, Innovation in Higher Education—New Universities in the United Kingdom (UNESCO, 1966 );

    Google Scholar 

  16. and F. Zweig, The Student in an Age of Anxiety (Heinemann, 1963 ).

    Google Scholar 

  17. The sources for this table are: J. Crutchley, J. Young, J. Grant, J. Gregory, B. Salter, Student Culture (SSRC Research Report, 1972) (This data in fact comes from a survey of Enfield College students, which since 1972 has been a part of Middlesex Polytechnic); and Pratt and Burgess, Polytechnics p. 86.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1978 Ted Tapper and Brian Salter

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tapper, T., Salter, B. (1978). Social Stratification in Higher Education: the Preservation of Traditional Patterns. In: Education and the Political Order. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15873-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics