Advertisement

Imbalanced Growth and Trade

  • Stuart Holland

Abstract

Regional theory now includes an extensive variety of Keynesian models. Most of them post-date the emphasis already given to demand in Myrdal or Perroux while it has already been seen that pre-Keynesian theory (for example, Marx and Ohlin) had stressed the role of factor demand in the process of regional resource allocation. In some cases Keynesian models have helped towards an understanding of regional growth and trade mechanisms, especially when tested against available evidence rather than elaborated in complete abstraction. But as some of their own exponents admit, many of these models are limited by relatively simplistic assumptions, and in several cases are subject to internal contradictions which severely limit their use in explaining problems in regional imbalance. More importantly, most of them are based on a Keynesian-neo-classical synthesis of a kind which Keynes’s own theory hardly supports. For instance, they stress equilibrium conditions under which regional self-balance or equilibrium could occur rather than analyse why imbalance and disequilibrium more frequently does occur.

Keywords

Capital Inflow Regional Income Export Sector Keynesian Model Interregional Trade 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    H. W. Richardson, Regional Economics ( London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1969 ) pp. 281–6.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ibid. pp. 324–5.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Richardson, Regional Economics, pp. 330.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ibid. p. 329.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brown, Framework of Regional Economics in the United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ibid. pp. 251–2.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ibid. p. 268.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ibid. p. 187.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ibid. pp. 190–1.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cf. Economic Consultants Ltd, Study for an Industrial Complex in Central Lancashire, (1969).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brown, Framework of Regional Economics in the United Kingdom, p. 180. Brown admits that considerably higher values for the input multiplier ranging from 1.1 to 2.5 for exports from a variety of industries were obtained for the Utah study of F. T. Moore and J. W. Peterson, ‘Regional Analysis: An Inter-industry Model of Utah’, Review of Economics and Statistics (November 1955).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cf. Ibid. pp. 21, 198–9. Brown admits that the outcome of his capital-stockadjustment analysis very much depends on the size of region, though does not in this context take account of differences of regional structure and major initial disparities. See Ibid. p. 194.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ibid. pp. 192–8.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. F. Harrod, ‘An Essay in Dynamic Theory’, Economic Journal (March 1939) pp 14–33; and Towards a Dynamic Economics ( London: Macmillan, 1948 ).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Harrod, An Essay.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
    J. R. Hicks, ‘Mr Harrod’s Dynamic Theory’, Economica(1949) pp. 106–21.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    See A. W. Phillips, ‘The Relationship between unemployment, and the rate of change of money wage rates in the United Kingdom 1861–1957’, Economica (1958) pp. 283–99.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    James Ingram, ‘State and Regional Payments Mechanisms’, Quarterly Journal of Economics (November 1959) pp. 619–32.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cf. ‘Regional Under-Development in a Developed Economy: the Italian Case’, Regional Studies, no. 2 (1971).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
    C. P. Kindleberger, Europe’s Postwar Growth: the Role of Labour Supply (Harvard University Press, 1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    A more persuasive account of the variety of factors, including government policies, is given by Michael Postan, An Economic History of Western Europe ( London: Methuen, 1967 )Google Scholar
  25. Andrew Shonfield, Modern Capitalism (Oxford University Press, 1965).Google Scholar
  26. 25.
    Cf. W. Arthur Lewis, ‘Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour’, The Manchester School (May 1954) pp. 139–91Google Scholar
  27. John C. H. Fei and Gustav Ranis, Development of the Labour Surplus Economy: Theory and Policy ( New York: Irwin, 1964 )Google Scholar
  28. John C. H. Fei and Gustav Ranis, ‘A Theory of Economic Development’, American Economic Review (September 1961) pp. 533–65. Cf. further, Chapter 3.Google Scholar
  29. 26.
    Marina von Neumann Whitman, ‘International and Interregional Payments Adjustment: a Synthetic View’, Princeton Studies in International Finance, no. 19 (1967).Google Scholar
  30. 27.
    Ibid. pp. 15–18.Google Scholar
  31. 28.
    Ibid. p. 20.Google Scholar
  32. 29.
    G. H. Borts and J. L. Stein, ‘Regional Growth and Maturity in the United States: A Study of Regional Structural Change’, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik, vol. 98 (1962)Google Scholar
  33. Page references in this text are to the reprint, L. (ed.), Regional Analysis ( Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1968 ).Google Scholar
  34. 30.
    Ibid. pp. 183–6.Google Scholar
  35. 31.
    Cf. Richard Andrews, ‘The Mechanics of the Urban Economic Base’, Land Economics, no. 3 (1953)Google Scholar
  36. George Hildebrand and Arthur Mace Jr, ‘The Employment Multiplier in an Expanding Industrial Market: Los Angeles County 1940–47’, Review of Economics and Statistics (August 1950) pp. 241–9.Google Scholar
  37. 32.
    Douglass North, ‘Location Theory and Regional Economic Growth’, Journal of Political Economy (June 1955).Google Scholar
  38. 88.
    Edgar Hoover and Joseph Fisher, ‘Research in Regional Economic Growth’, in Problems in the Study of Economic Growth ( July 1949 ) Universities National Bureau Committee on Economic Research, mimeographed.Google Scholar
  39. 84.
    Ibid. p. 184. In other words, the authors’ stages-of-growth case is nonRostowian, and stresses the difficulty of progression to increasingly higher income stages.Google Scholar
  40. 85.
    Ibid. pp. 184–6.Google Scholar
  41. 36.
    Shonfield, Modern Capitalism, ch. 13, pp. 301ff. on ‘The Tradition of Public Enterprise’. Also G. S. Callander, ‘The Early Transportation and Banking Enterprises of the States in Relation to the Growth of Corporations’. Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 17 (1902) pp. 111ffCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stuart Bruchey, The Roots of American Economic Growth 1607–1861 (Hutchinson University Library 1965) chs 5 and 6.Google Scholar
  43. 37.
    Cf. among others, Arthur Schlesinger, The Age of Roosevelt ( New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1959 ).Google Scholar
  44. 38.
    Data from Richard Easterlin, Personal Income of the United States (1958) and the Department of Commerce indicates that the share of the Plains farming states fell from 97 per cent to 82 per cent of the national average from 1900 to 1930, and that of the South-East from 56 per cent to 50 per cent from 1920 to 1930, recovering to some 57 per cent by 1940. For the South-east, which includes the main Appalachian and ‘Deep South’ states the federal expenditure programme might well be thought of in terms of a Hicksian lower equilibrium path promoting an upturn in regional income, as opposed to the cumulative downturn which otherwise might have been expected to continue.Google Scholar
  45. 39.
    Werner Hochwald, ‘Interregional Income Flows and the South’, in Essays in Southern Economic Development, ed. Melvin Greenhut and W. Tate Whitman (University of North Carolina Press, 1964) ch. 9.Google Scholar
  46. 40.
    Cf. U.S. Department of Commerce, ‘Total and Per Capita Personal Income by Regions and States’, Survey of Current Business (August 1969). (The South-East region states increased their per capita personal income level from 1948 to 1968 from 59.9 per cent to 60.9 per cent of the average for the Mid-East (New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, etc.)Google Scholar
  47. For an analysis of the regional contribution of defence expenditure since the war cf. Roger Bolton, Defense Purchases and Regional Growth, (Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1966) especially ch. 6.Google Scholar
  48. 41.
    North, ‘Location Theory and Regional Economic Growth’. The quotation is from the last sentence of North’s article, and is perhaps the more significant in terms of its implicit long-run equilibrium assumptions for its throw-away character.Google Scholar
  49. 42.
    Perloff, Dunn, Lampard and. Muth point out that much of the inflowing capital on which the development of U.S. agriculture, forestry and mining in the West and South-East was based came not from the urban capitals of the Eastern seaboard, but from the urban-industrial economies of Western Europe. Cf. Harvey Perloff, Edgar Dunn, Eric Lampard and Richard Muth, Regions, Resources and Economic Growth (1960) p. 287.Google Scholar
  50. 43.
    Charles Tiebout, ‘Exports and Regional Economic Growth’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 64 (April 1956).Google Scholar
  51. 44.
    million southerners migrated from the region between 1876 and 1930, and 6,050,000 of them abroad. Cf. SVIMEZ, Un Secolo di Statistiche Italiane, Nord e Sud 1861–1961 (1961).Google Scholar
  52. 45.
    Pasquale Saraceno, ‘La Mancata Unificazione Italiana a Cento Anni dall’ Unificazione Politica’, reprinted in Saraceno, L’Italia Verso la Piena Occupazione (1963) p. 26Google Scholar
  53. Cf. also among post-war analyses of the post-1861 effects of integration of the South with the rest of Italy: Alberto Benzoni, ‘Il Mezzogiorno nello Stato Italiano’, in Mezzogiorno e politico di piano, ed. Achille Parisi and Goffredo Zappa (1964)Google Scholar
  54. Paolo Sylos-Labini, ‘Osservazioni sull’Evoluzione Economica del Mezzogiorno’, in Scritti in Memoria di Alessandro Molinari, SVIMEZ (1963)Google Scholar
  55. Luigi del Pane, ‘Les transformations des structures économiques de l’Italie unifiée,’ Revue Economique (May-September 1965 ).Google Scholar
  56. 46.
    Cf. Paolo Sylos-Labini (ed.), untitled contribution to Club Turati and Fondazione Adriano Olivetti, Nord-Sud: i nuovi termini di un problema nazionale (1970) p. 345.Google Scholar
  57. 47.
    Cf. Roberto Mainardi, ‘Caratteristiche Demografiche ed Economiche delle Grandi Città Italiane’, Appendice statistica, in Le Grandi Città Italiane, ed. Mainardi, Franco Angeli (1970). It should be noted that the foreign-trade proportions of the cities and their provinces understates the total foreign trade of the regions concerned since it excludes the other regional provinces.Google Scholar
  58. 48.
    Cf. R. I. McKinnon, ‘Optimum World Monetary Arrangements and the Dual Currency System’, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review (December 1963) 19.Google Scholar
  59. 49.
    Cf. R. A. Mundell, ‘A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas’, American Economic Review (November 1961) pp. 509–17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Stuart Holland 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stuart Holland
    • 1
  1. 1.European SchoolUniversity of SussexUK

Personalised recommendations