Abstract
Any meaningful analysis of scientific abuse must probe the very nature of the scientific process itself, and the objective role of science within the ideological framework of a given society. As such, it ceases to be merely a ‘problem of science’ and takes on a political dimension. It extends beyond the important, but limited, introverted soul-searching of the scientific community, and recognises the need for wider public involvement. Many ‘progressive’ scientists now realise that this is so, but still see their role as the interpreters of the mystical world of science for a largely ignorant mass, which when enlightened will then support the scientists in their intention ‘not to use my scientific knowledge or status to promote practices which I consider dangerous’.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
K. Marx, Capital, vol. I (London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1974 ) p. 174.
G. Friedmann; quoted in E. Mandel, Marxist Economic Theory ( London: Merlin Press, 1971 ) p. 183.
R. Boguslaw, The New Utopians: a Study of System Design and Social Change ( Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1965 ).
W. Fairbairn; quoted by J. B. Jefferys, The Story of the Engineers ( London: Lawrence & Wishart for the AEU, 1945 ) p. 9.
W. H. Whyte, The Organisation Man (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1956 ).
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1976 Hilary Rose and Steven Rose
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cooley, M. (1976). Contradictions of Science and Technology in the Productive Process. In: Rose, H., Rose, S. (eds) The Political Economy of Science. Critical Social Studies. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15725-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15725-9_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-21138-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-15725-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)