Advertisement

The Theory of City Size and Spacing

  • K. J. Button

Abstract

The theory of city size has attracted a great deal of attention in recent years. The literature has concentrated on two distinct but nevertheless related issues. The first of these involves the definition of the most desirable ‘optimal’ city size. Discussion of this question has been far-ranging, involving not just economists but also sociologists, town planners, social psychologists and ecologists to name but a few. In a purely practical sense it is particularly difficult to reach any firm conclusion in this area because of the lack of really relevant information and the immense difficulty of quantifying many of the considerations important to the debate. These are problems additional to the theoretical difficulties involved, but the lack of a solution in the short term suggests it is unlikely that any of the various theories of optimality which have been advanced will be empirically substantiated in the foreseeable future. These practical and theoretical problems often distract from the far more important question of whether an optimum size of city can ever be defined satisfactorily or, indeed, whether it is important to attempt such a definition. The general argument to justify work in this area is that local authorities need some idea of the optimal-size population they should encourage to settle in their cities but, as we shall see later, this can lead to various conflicts of interest.

Keywords

Cost Curve Urban Economic Agglomeration Economy City Size Royal Commission 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C. A. Baker [1910], ‘Population and Costs in Relation to City Management’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (December) pp. 73–9.Google Scholar
  2. Barnett House Survey Committee [1938], Survey of the Social Services in the Oxford District (Oxford: Survey Committee of Barnett House).Google Scholar
  3. W. Beckerman [1974], In Defense of Economic Growth (London: Jonathan Cape).Google Scholar
  4. B. J. L. Berry [1961], ‘City Size Distributions and Economic Development’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, pp. 573–88.Google Scholar
  5. E. von Boventer [1973], ‘City Size Systems: Theoretical Issues, Empirical Regularities and Planning Guides’, Urban Studies (June) pp. 145–62.Google Scholar
  6. A. J. Brown [1972], The Framework of Regional Economics in the United Kingdom (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  7. C. Clark [1945], ‘The Economic Functions of a City in Relation to its Size’, Econometrica (April) pp. 97–113.Google Scholar
  8. O. D. Duncan [1956], ‘The Optimum Size of Cities’, in Demographic Analysis, ed. J. J. Spengler and O. D. Duncan (New York: Free Press).Google Scholar
  9. O. D. Duncan [1959], ‘Service Industries and the Urban Hierarchy’, Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, pp. 105–35.Google Scholar
  10. A. W. Evans [1972], ‘The Pure Theory of City Size in an Industrial Economy’, Urban Studies (February) pp. 49–77.Google Scholar
  11. A. W. Evans [1973], ‘The Location of the Headquarters of Industrial Companies’, Urban Studies (October) pp. 387–95.Google Scholar
  12. W. Hirsch [1959], ‘Central Place Theory and Regional Urban Hierarchies: An Empirical Note’, Review of Economics and Statistics, pp. 232–41.Google Scholar
  13. K. S. Lomax [1943], ‘Expenditure Per Head and Size of Population’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, pp. 51–9.Google Scholar
  14. A. Losch [1954], The Economics of Location (Yale University Press).Google Scholar
  15. E. J. Mishan [1967], The Costs of Economic Growth (Harmondsworth: Penguin).Google Scholar
  16. G. M. Neutze [1965], Economic Policy and the Size of Cities (Canberra: Australian National University).Google Scholar
  17. H. W. Richardson [1972], ‘Optimality in City Size, Systems of Cities and Urban Policy: a Sceptic’s Views’, Urban Studies (February), pp. 29–48.Google Scholar
  18. H. W. Richardson [1973a], ‘Theory of the Distribution of City Sizes: Review and Prospects’, Regional Studies, pp. 239–51.Google Scholar
  19. H. W. Richardson [1973b], The Economics of Urban Size (Farnborough: Saxon House).Google Scholar
  20. Royal Commission of Local Government in Greater London [1960], Report, Cmnd. 1164 (London: H.M.S.O.).Google Scholar
  21. Royal Commission on Local Government in England [1969], Report, Cmnd. 4040 (London: H.M.S.O.).Google Scholar
  22. Svimez [1967], Ricerca sin Coste d’Insediamento cited by G. C. Cameron [1970], ‘Growth Areas, Growth Centres and Regional Conversion’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy (February) pp. 19–38.Google Scholar
  23. J. Tinbergen [1968], ‘The Hierarchy Model of the Size Distribution of Centres’, Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, pp. 65–8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© K. J. Button 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. J. Button
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LoughboroughUK

Personalised recommendations