Skip to main content

Interpretation of Financial Statements

  • Chapter
Accounting: An Introduction

Abstract

In this chapter we examine methods of control which do not necessarily rely on the use of budgets as described in Chapter 15. The criteria against which to judge a firm’s performance may include budgets, but may also rely on comparisons with the performance of other firms, or norms for industry as a whole.’ If managers or shareholders wish to assess whether the performance of a firm is satisfactory they will want to develop a set of criteria against which to gauge the actual results of decisions. To rely on the measurement of performance through periodic profit calculation is, as we have seen earlier, limited by the attachment to accounting concepts. However, it is possible to abstract many of the characterisitics of the firm, e.g. its profitability and liquidity, by examining patterns of relationships shown by the balance sheet and profit statement. These relationships are normally expressed for convenience in the form of ratios, which facilitate comparison between divisions of a firm, or firms within an industry, or with the economy as a whole. As explained in Sect. 14.1 this analysis provides a basis for several aspects of control, for example, the individual investor who uses information for decisions about buying or selling shares, and managers who use information to assess the performance of their firms or to make decisions within them. This chapter will analyse the uses of ratios for these various aspects of control and their limitations in the analysis of financial statements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  • K. W. Bevan, The Use of Ratios in the Study of Business Fluctations and Trends (General Educational Trust of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, 1966 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Bailey, Current Practice in Company Accounts (London Haymarket, 1973 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. P. Francis, The Foundations of Financial Management ( London, Pitman Publishing, 1973 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • L. R. Amey, The Efficiency of Business Enterprises (London, Allen & Unwin, 1969 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Dearden, ‘The Case against R.O.I. Control’ The Harvard Business Review, May June 1969 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Lev. Lev, ‘Industry Averages as Targets for Financial Ratios’,Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 7 (Autumn 1969 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Solomons, Divisional Performance: Measurement and Control (Homewood, Ill,. Urwin, 1965) chap. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Solomons and J. Laya, ‘Measurement of Company Profitability: Some Systematic Errors in the Accounting Rate of Return’, in Financial Research and Management Decisions, ed. A. A. Robichek ( New York, N.Y., John Wiley liheng Sons, 1967 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Flower, ‘Measurement of Divisional Performance’, Accounting and Business Research (September 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Accounting Standards Steering Committee, The Corporate Report (The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1977 Arthur Hindmarch, Miles Atchison, Richard Marke

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hindmarch, A., Atchison, M., Marke, R. (1977). Interpretation of Financial Statements. In: Accounting: An Introduction. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15639-9_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics