Abstract
It is easy for the historian of medieval government to over-simplify the ideas men had of monarchy in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. One can read into the institution of kingship political theories that were present, if at all, in embryonic forms, giving more significance than is their due to signs of an elective or hereditary monarchy and to the limitations upon as well as the rights of kings. Kingship in the High Middle Ages was an amalgam of elements that had never been separately analysed because the theoretical foundations upon which it was based were only just coming to be considered. It was at the same time hereditary and elective or nominative — that is to say that kings succeeded one another because they were related, but also because of the choice of their subjects or nomination by their predecessors. The monarchs were heirs to the public rights of the Roman principate or Germanic theocracy, but they were also bound by feudal contract and by custom. The historian must also recognise that the Kingdom of Jerusalem was a state in some ways unlike those with which he is familiar.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 1974 Jonathan Riley-Smith
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Riley-Smith, J. (1974). The Assise Sur La Ligece. In: The Feudal Nobility and The Kingdom of Jerusalem, 1174–1277. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15498-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15498-2_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-0616-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-15498-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)