Abstract
THE foregoing comparisons were made upon the assumption that the factors of production are used in the same proportions under monopoly and under competition.1 As we saw in Chapter 14, the assumption that the proportions of the factors are fixed, that is to say, that there is only one way of producing any given output, is highly unplausible. Even if the proportions of land, labour, and capital can be imagined to be fixed in the long period, it is extremely improbable that the proportion of entrepreneurship to output should be fixed by technical considerations alone. We were able to find cases, however, in which the proportions of factors producing any given output would in fact be the same under monopoly and under competition, even when variation was technically possible. If the supply of all factors is perfectly elastic, or if the elasticities of all are equal, or if the monopolist pays no rent, and there are no economies of large scale, there is nothing to be gained in the production of any given output by altering the competitive proportions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 1969 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Robinson, J. (1969). Correction of the Comparisons. In: The Economics of Imperfect Competition. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15320-6_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15320-6_25
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-10289-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-15320-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)