Abstract
This chapter considers a number of claims concerning the de-tradition-alisation of the cultural realm. This process reflects the movement from the externally organised to the vagus (the ‘wandering’ or ‘straying’ as the SOED puts it). The context is thus set for exploring a particular instance of the internalising shift to the apparently de-traditionalised and thus post-modern, that known as the New Age movement. It can be argued that this form of spirituality is not postmodern, one reason being that, in practice, it could well be more traditionalised than first appearances might indicate; another being that New Age sacralisation of the self aims to provide an essentialised foundationalism of identity and authority. The central purpose of this chapter is to challenge the link between New Age beliefs and postmodernism.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
Scott Lash and John Urry, The End of Organised Capitalism (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987), pp. 312–13.
Stephen Crook, Jan Pakulski and Malcolm Waters, Postmodernization: Change in Advanced Society, London: Sage, 1992, p. 57 and pp. 36 and 69
Scott Lash, Sociology of Postmodernism (London: Routledge, 1990).
Mike Savage, James Barlow, Peter Dickens and Tony Fielding, Property, Bureaucracy and Culture (London: Routledge, 1992), p. 129.
Ernest Gellner, Postmodernism, Reason and Religion (London: Routledge, 1992), p. 24.
James Ogilvy, cited by Christopher Lasch, The True and Only Heaven (London: W.W. Norton, 1991), p. 522.
Douglas Kellner, ‘Popular Culture and the Construction of Postmodern Identities’, in Scott Lash and Jonathan Friedman (eds), Modernity and Identity (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992), p. 144.
Arthur Kroker and David Cook, The Postmodern Scene (New York: St Martin’s Press, 1986), p. 274.
Talcott Parsons, Action Theory and the Human Condition (London: The Free Press, 1978), pp. 320–2.
Ronald Inglehart, The Silent Revolution (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1977). Meredith Veldman provides an innovative account of ‘romantic protest’, dwelling on the 1945–80 period. See Fantasy, the Bomb and the Greening of Britain (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).
Dick Anthony, Bruce Ecker and Ken Wilber, Spiritual Choices (New York: Paragon House, 1987), p. 7.
Zygmunt Bauman, Postmodern Ethics (Oxford: Blackwell, 1993).
Bryan Turner, Religion and Social Theory (London: Sage, 1991), p. xviii.
Fredric Jameson, Postmodernism: Or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism (London: Verso, 1991), p. xx.
Jane Hundley, ‘Beauty in the New Age or the Power of Personal Presence’, in Sondrad Ray (ed.), How to be Chic, Fabulous and Live Forever (Berkeley, CA: Celestial Arts, 1990), p. 207.
Richard Adams and Janice Haaken, ‘Anticultural Culture: Lifespring’s Ideology and Its Roots in Humanistic Psychology’, Journal of Humanistic Psychology, vol. 27, no. 4, autumn 1987, pp. 502–3.
Adelaide Bry, Est (London: Turnstone Books, 1976), p. 175.
Michael Perry, Gods Within (London: SPCK, 1992), p. 147.
Ma Satya Bharti, Death Comes Dancing (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981), p. 118.
Vivianne Crowley, Wicca: The Old Religion in the New Age (Wellingborough: Aquarian Press, 1989), p. 219.
Robert Bellah, Richard Madsen, William Sullivan, Ann Swidler and Steven Tipton, Habits of the Heart (London: University of California Press, 1985), p. 221.
William Bartley, Werner Erhard (New York: Clarkson N. Potter, 1978), p. 174.
Emile Durkheim, ‘Individualism and the Intellectuals’, in Robert Bellah (ed.), Emile Durkheim. On Morality and Society (London: University of Chicago Press, 1973), pp. 43–57; Robert Bellah, et al., Habits of the Heart, op. cit.; and Charles Taylor, Sources of the Self (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).
Mircea Eliade, Occultism, Witchcraft, and Cultural Fashions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976), p. 50.
See, for example, Marie-France James, Esoterisme, Occultisme, Franc-Maçonnerie et Christianisme (Paris: Nouvelles Editions Latines, 1981).
E.P. Thompson, Witness against the Beast (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).
Norman Cohn, The Pursuit of the Millennium (London: Granada, 1970), especially ch. 9.
The term ‘epistemological individualism’ is taken from Roy Wallis, The Elementary Forms of the New Religious Life (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984), p. 100.
Rachel Kohn, ‘Radical Subjectivity in “Self Religions” and the Problem of Authority’, in Alan Black (ed.), Religion in Australia (London: Allen & Unwin, 1991), p. 136.
Carol Riddel, The Findhorn Community (Findhorn: Findhorn Press, 1991), p. 25.
On the last, see Judith Thompson and Paul Heelas, The Way of the Heart, The Rajneesh Movement (Wellingborough: Thorsons, 1986); see also Lewis Carter, Charisma and Control in Rajneeshpuram (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).
S. Radhakrishnan, ‘Foreword’ to Arthur Osborne, Ramana Maharshi and the Path of Self-Knowledge (Bombay: Jaico Publishing House, 1954), p. xi.
This is a point well-made by Louis Schneider and Sanford Dornbusch, Popular Religion. Inspirational Books in America (London: The University of Chicago Press, 1958).
Charles Taylor, The Ethics of Authenticity (London: Harvard University Press, 1991), p. 14.
Edward Shils, Tradition (London: Faber & Faber, 1981), pp. 10–11.
De-traditionalisation, it might be noted, also involves the process of ‘de-institutionalisation’. See Arnold Gehlen, Man in the Age of Technology (New York: Columbia University Press, 1980). The expression ‘from fate to choice’ is taken from Peter L. Berger, The Heretical Imperative (New York: Anchor/Doubleday Press, 1979).
James Hunter, ‘Subjectivization and the New Evangelical Theodicy’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion vol. 21, no. 1, 1982, pp. 39–47.
Reginald Bibby, Fragmented Gods (Toronto: Stoddart, 1987).
Robert Wuthnow, The Struggle for America’s Soul (Grand Rapids: William B. Eeerdmans, 1989), p. 116.
Alan Race, ‘Orthodox Ripostes’, The Times Literary Supplement (15 September 1992).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1999 Kieran Flanagan and Peter C. Jupp
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heelas, P. (1999). De-traditionalisation of Religion and Self: The New Age and Postmodernity. In: Flanagan, K., Jupp, P.C. (eds) Postmodernity, Sociology and Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14989-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14989-6_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-75198-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-14989-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)