Skip to main content

De-traditionalisation of Religion and Self: The New Age and Postmodernity

  • Chapter
Postmodernity, Sociology and Religion
  • 112 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter considers a number of claims concerning the de-tradition-alisation of the cultural realm. This process reflects the movement from the externally organised to the vagus (the ‘wandering’ or ‘straying’ as the SOED puts it). The context is thus set for exploring a particular instance of the internalising shift to the apparently de-traditionalised and thus post-modern, that known as the New Age movement. It can be argued that this form of spirituality is not postmodern, one reason being that, in practice, it could well be more traditionalised than first appearances might indicate; another being that New Age sacralisation of the self aims to provide an essentialised foundationalism of identity and authority. The central purpose of this chapter is to challenge the link between New Age beliefs and postmodernism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Scott Lash and John Urry, The End of Organised Capitalism (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987), pp. 312–13.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stephen Crook, Jan Pakulski and Malcolm Waters, Postmodernization: Change in Advanced Society, London: Sage, 1992, p. 57 and pp. 36 and 69

    Google Scholar 

  3. Scott Lash, Sociology of Postmodernism (London: Routledge, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mike Savage, James Barlow, Peter Dickens and Tony Fielding, Property, Bureaucracy and Culture (London: Routledge, 1992), p. 129.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ernest Gellner, Postmodernism, Reason and Religion (London: Routledge, 1992), p. 24.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. James Ogilvy, cited by Christopher Lasch, The True and Only Heaven (London: W.W. Norton, 1991), p. 522.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Douglas Kellner, ‘Popular Culture and the Construction of Postmodern Identities’, in Scott Lash and Jonathan Friedman (eds), Modernity and Identity (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992), p. 144.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Arthur Kroker and David Cook, The Postmodern Scene (New York: St Martin’s Press, 1986), p. 274.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Talcott Parsons, Action Theory and the Human Condition (London: The Free Press, 1978), pp. 320–2.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ronald Inglehart, The Silent Revolution (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1977). Meredith Veldman provides an innovative account of ‘romantic protest’, dwelling on the 1945–80 period. See Fantasy, the Bomb and the Greening of Britain (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dick Anthony, Bruce Ecker and Ken Wilber, Spiritual Choices (New York: Paragon House, 1987), p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zygmunt Bauman, Postmodern Ethics (Oxford: Blackwell, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bryan Turner, Religion and Social Theory (London: Sage, 1991), p. xviii.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fredric Jameson, Postmodernism: Or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism (London: Verso, 1991), p. xx.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jane Hundley, ‘Beauty in the New Age or the Power of Personal Presence’, in Sondrad Ray (ed.), How to be Chic, Fabulous and Live Forever (Berkeley, CA: Celestial Arts, 1990), p. 207.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Richard Adams and Janice Haaken, ‘Anticultural Culture: Lifespring’s Ideology and Its Roots in Humanistic Psychology’, Journal of Humanistic Psychology, vol. 27, no. 4, autumn 1987, pp. 502–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Adelaide Bry, Est (London: Turnstone Books, 1976), p. 175.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Michael Perry, Gods Within (London: SPCK, 1992), p. 147.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ma Satya Bharti, Death Comes Dancing (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981), p. 118.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vivianne Crowley, Wicca: The Old Religion in the New Age (Wellingborough: Aquarian Press, 1989), p. 219.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Robert Bellah, Richard Madsen, William Sullivan, Ann Swidler and Steven Tipton, Habits of the Heart (London: University of California Press, 1985), p. 221.

    Google Scholar 

  22. William Bartley, Werner Erhard (New York: Clarkson N. Potter, 1978), p. 174.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Emile Durkheim, ‘Individualism and the Intellectuals’, in Robert Bellah (ed.), Emile Durkheim. On Morality and Society (London: University of Chicago Press, 1973), pp. 43–57; Robert Bellah, et al., Habits of the Heart, op. cit.; and Charles Taylor, Sources of the Self (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mircea Eliade, Occultism, Witchcraft, and Cultural Fashions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976), p. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See, for example, Marie-France James, Esoterisme, Occultisme, Franc-Maçonnerie et Christianisme (Paris: Nouvelles Editions Latines, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  26. E.P. Thompson, Witness against the Beast (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Norman Cohn, The Pursuit of the Millennium (London: Granada, 1970), especially ch. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  28. The term ‘epistemological individualism’ is taken from Roy Wallis, The Elementary Forms of the New Religious Life (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984), p. 100.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rachel Kohn, ‘Radical Subjectivity in “Self Religions” and the Problem of Authority’, in Alan Black (ed.), Religion in Australia (London: Allen & Unwin, 1991), p. 136.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Carol Riddel, The Findhorn Community (Findhorn: Findhorn Press, 1991), p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  31. On the last, see Judith Thompson and Paul Heelas, The Way of the Heart, The Rajneesh Movement (Wellingborough: Thorsons, 1986); see also Lewis Carter, Charisma and Control in Rajneeshpuram (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  32. S. Radhakrishnan, ‘Foreword’ to Arthur Osborne, Ramana Maharshi and the Path of Self-Knowledge (Bombay: Jaico Publishing House, 1954), p. xi.

    Google Scholar 

  33. This is a point well-made by Louis Schneider and Sanford Dornbusch, Popular Religion. Inspirational Books in America (London: The University of Chicago Press, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Charles Taylor, The Ethics of Authenticity (London: Harvard University Press, 1991), p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Edward Shils, Tradition (London: Faber & Faber, 1981), pp. 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  36. De-traditionalisation, it might be noted, also involves the process of ‘de-institutionalisation’. See Arnold Gehlen, Man in the Age of Technology (New York: Columbia University Press, 1980). The expression ‘from fate to choice’ is taken from Peter L. Berger, The Heretical Imperative (New York: Anchor/Doubleday Press, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  37. James Hunter, ‘Subjectivization and the New Evangelical Theodicy’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion vol. 21, no. 1, 1982, pp. 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Reginald Bibby, Fragmented Gods (Toronto: Stoddart, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Robert Wuthnow, The Struggle for America’s Soul (Grand Rapids: William B. Eeerdmans, 1989), p. 116.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Alan Race, ‘Orthodox Ripostes’, The Times Literary Supplement (15 September 1992).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1999 Kieran Flanagan and Peter C. Jupp

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heelas, P. (1999). De-traditionalisation of Religion and Self: The New Age and Postmodernity. In: Flanagan, K., Jupp, P.C. (eds) Postmodernity, Sociology and Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14989-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics