Conversion of Military R&D in the U.S. Context
This chapter presents an overall view of the issues surrounding the conversion of military research and development (R&D). It makes a number of fundamental distinctions: between research and development; between military R&D, which is primarily concentrated at the development end of the spectrum, and civilian R&D; between basic and applied research; and between cost-reducing and cost-enhancing research. It discusses the flow of benefits between military and civilian R&D, in both directions, and it explores the role of the university in military research — a role that may be more highly developed in the United States than in the former Soviet Union.
KeywordsTransportation Amid Assure Kelly Tempo
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Defense Conversion: Redirecting R&D (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, May 1993), P. 7.Google Scholar
- 4.Sam Nunn, ‘Strategic Environmental Research: A New Dimension of National Security,’ Aspen Quarterly (Autumn 1990), p. 87.Google Scholar
- See also, U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Defense Conversion: Redirecting R&D, (May 1993), ch. 3.Google Scholar
- 5.U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Holding the Edge: Maintaining the Defense Technology Base (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, April 1989), p. 30.Google Scholar
- 6.Adam Yarmolinsky, Paradoxes of Power (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1983), pp. 233–34.Google Scholar
- 13.Adam Yarmolinsky and Gregory D. Foster, Paradoxes of Power (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
- See also Ben R. Rich and Leo Janow, Skunk Works: A Personal Memoir of my Years at Lockheed (New York: Little, Brown & Co., 1994).Google Scholar