Masonry in Tension, Shear and Biaxial Stress

  • Arnold W. Hendry
Chapter

Abstract

The resistance of masonry to tensile or shear stresses is dependent on the bond between mortar and masonry units. The mechanism of bond between unit and mortar is incompletely understood but is known to be influenced by a large number of factors. These have been set out by Groot [1] in the matrix form shown in figure 4.1. It will be clear from this that the problem of masonry bond is extremely complex and most investigations so far have been of a phenomenological nature, applying to specific combinations of materials. However, some more fundamental work has been reported in which the physical and chemical nature of the brick/mortar interface has been studied. Experiments by Grandet [2] on the interaction between brick material and cement paste have shown that this is critically affected by the formation of a micro-layer of ettringite (3CaSO4. Al2O3. 3CaO. 31H2O) at the clay-cement interface, and by the respective mean diameters of the pores of the brick and of the micro-crystals of the ettringite. It is necessary for the pore size of the brick material to be greater than 0.05 mm for a mechanical bond to be formed, and also for the cement to be properly hydrated behind the ettringite layer, despite the withdrawal of some of the water by suction from the brick. If the brick is dry, and has a high suction rate, there will be a partially hydrated zone in the cement paste, to a depth of several millimetres, and possessing poor mechanical strength. The movement of water between the brick and the mortar, and the resulting effects on the development of the mechanical bond between these components, was shown to be considerably affected by their specific surfaces and capillary dimensions. Grandet concluded that it is possible on the basis of these observations to obtain some indication of the likely behaviour of cement mortars, which would, however, also be influenced by such other parameters as the compaction of the mortar, its cement content and water retentivity. The effects of water movement on bond between various combinations of mortar and unit have been studied by Groot [3] who concluded that a primary cause of poor bond in clay masonry is the presence of an unduly high proportion of fine material at the mortar/brick interface. In the case of calcium silicate bricks, poor bond results from the presence of too many fine pores in the bricks.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    C. J. W. P. Groot, ‘Bond in Masonry’, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Structural Engineering Analysis and Modelling (University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana, 1987).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. Grandet, ‘Physico-Chemical Mechanisms of the Bond between Clay and Cement’, Proceedings of the Third International Brick Masonry Conference (Essen) 1973, eds L. Foertig and K. Gobel (Bundesverband der Deutschen Ziegelindustrie, Bonn, 1975), pp. 217–21.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Groot, ‘Effects of Water on Mortar—Brick Bond’, Thesis (Technical Univ, Delft, 1993).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Lawrence and H. T. Cao, ‘An Experimental Study of the Interface between Brick and Mortar’, Proceedings of the Fourth North American Masonry Conference (Los Angeles) 1987, pp. 48.1–14.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. Binda and G. Baronio, ‘Survey of Brick/Binder Adhesion in “Powdered Brick ” Mortars and Plasters’, Masonry International, 2(2) (1988).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. P. Sinha, ‘Model Studies Related to Load Bearing Brickwork’, PhD Thesis (University of Edinburgh, 1967).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. Anderson and L. C. Held, ‘The Effect of Sand Grading on Mortar Properties and the Tensile Bond of Brickwork Specimens’, Proc. Br. Masonry Soc., 1 (1986) 1–6.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Schubert, ‘Tensile and Flexural Strength of Masonry — Influences, Test Methods, Test Results’, Proceedings of the Tenth International Brick and Block Masonry Conference (Calgary) 1994, pp. 895–907.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. J. Lawrence and T. W. Morgan, ‘Strength and Stiffness of Brickwork in Lateral Bending’, Proc. Br. Ceram. Soc., 24 (1975) 79–90.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. J. Lawrence, ‘Flexural Strength of Brickwork Normal to and Parallel to the Bed Joints’, J. Aust. Ceram. Soc., II (1975) 5–6.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. P. Sinha and A. W. Hendry, ‘Tensile Strength of Brickwork Specimens’, Proc. Br. Ceram. Soc., 24 (1975) 91–100.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. W. Hendry, ‘The Lateral Strength of Unreinforced Brickwork’, Struct. Engr., 57 (1973) 43–50.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. R. Baker, ‘Brickwork Panels Subjected to Face Wind Loads’, M. Eng. Sci. Thesis (University of Melbourne, 1972).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. W. H. West, ‘The Flexural Strength of Clay Masonry determined from Wallette Specimens’, Proceedings of the Fourth International Brick Masonry Conference (Brugge) 1976, Paper 4.a.6.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. A. James, ‘An Investigation of the Lateral Load Resistance of Walls of Unreinforced Brickwork without Precompression Built in Clay Bricks’, Report W/Lat/1 (Building Development Laboratories, Morley, W. Australia).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    L. R. Baker, ‘Variability Aspects of the Flexural Strength of Brickwork’, Proceedings of the Fourth International Brick Masonry Conference (Brugge) 1976, Paper 2.b.4.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    L. R. Baker, ‘The Flexural Action of Masonry Structures under Lateral Load’, PhD Thesis (Deakin University, 1981).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    C. Anderson, ‘Tensile Bond Tests with Concrete Blocks’, Int. J. Masonry Construction, 1(4) (1981) 134–48.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. Sise, N. G. Shrive and E. L. Jessop, ‘Flexural Bond Strength of Masonry Stack Prisms’, Proc. Br. Masonry Soc., 2 (1988) 103–7.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    W. Mann, ‘Tensile and Flexural Strength of Masonry’, Proceedings of the Ninth International Brick/Block Masonry Conference (Berlin) 1991, pp. 1292–301.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    C. Anderson, ‘Some Observations on Masonry Wallette Testing’, Int. J. Masonry Construction, 2(4) (1982) 146–54.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. Fried, C. Anderson and D. Gairns, ‘A Comparative Study of Experimental Techniques for Determining the Flexural Resistance of Masonry’, Proc. Br. Masonry Soc., 2 (1988) 98–102.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. H. Brown and B. D. Palm, ‘Flexural Strength of Brick Masonry using the Bond Wrench’, Proceedings of the Second North American Masonry Conference (University of Maryland) 1982, Paper 1.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    B. P. Sinha and A. W. Hendry, ‘Racking Tests on Storey-Height Shear Wall Structures with Openings Subjected to Pre-compression’, in Designing, Engineering and Constructing with Masonry Products, ed. F. B. Johnson (Gulf, Houston, Tex., 1969), pp. 192–9.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    A. W. Hendry and B. P. Sinha, ‘Shear Tests on Full Scale Single Storey Brickwork Structures Subjected to Precompression’, Civ. Engng Publ. Wks Rev., 66 (1971) 1339–44.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    J. C. G. Chinwah, ‘Shear Resistance of Brick Walls’, PhD Thesis (University of London, 1972).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    K. Pieper and W. Trautsch, ‘Shear Tests on Walls’, Proceedings of the Second International Brick Masonry Conference (Stoke-on-Trent) 1971, eds H. W. H. West and K. H. Speed (British Ceramic Research Association, Stoke-on-Trent, 1971), pp. 140–3.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    H. Schneider, ‘Tests on Shear Resistance of Masonry’, Proceedings of the Fourth International Brick Masonry Conference (Brugge) 1976, Paper 4.b.12.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    H. Schneider and W. Schnell, ‘Tests on the Shear Strength of Brickwork’, Betonwerk & Fertigteil-Technik, 44 (1978) 303–9, 369–75.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    A. A. Hamid and R. C. Drysdale, ‘The Shear Behaviour of Brickwork Bed Joints’, Proc. Br. Ceram. Soc., 30 (1982) 101–9.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    W. Mann and H. Muller, ‘Failure of Shear-Stressed Masonry — An Enlarged Theory, Tests and Application to Shear Walls’, Proc. Br. Ceram. Soc., 30 (1982) 223–35.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    C. Dialer, ‘Some Remarks on the Strength and Deformation Behaviour of Shear Stressed Masonry Panels under Static Monotone Loading’, Proceedings of the Ninth International Brick/Block Masonry Conference (Berlin) 1991, pp. 277–82.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    W. Samarasinghe, ‘In Plane Strength of Brickwork’, PhD Thesis (University of Edinburth, 1980).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    A. W. Page, ‘An Experimental Investigation of the Biaxial Strength of Brick Masonry’, Proceedings of the Sixth International Brick Masonry Conference (Rome) 1982, pp. 3–15.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    H. R. Ganz, R. Guggisberg, J. Schwarz and B. Thurlimann, ‘Contributions to the Design of Masonry Walls’, Institut für Baustatik und Konstruktion ETH Zurich, Bericht Nr. 168 (Berkhauser Verlag, Basel, Boston, 1989).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    G. A. Hegemeir, R. O. Nunn and S. K. Arya, ‘Behaviour of Concrete Masonry under Biaxial Stress’, Proceedings of the First North American Masonry Conference (Boulder) 1976, pp. 1/1–24.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    A. Bernardini, C. Modena and U. Vescovi, ‘An Anisotropic Biaxial Failure Criterion for Hollow Clay Brick Masonry’, Int. J. Masonry Construction, 2(4) (1982) 165–71.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    A. A. Hamid and R. G. Drysdale, ‘Proposed Failure Criteria for Concrete Block Masonry under Biaxial Stresses’, Proc. ASCE J. Struct. Div., 107(2) (1981) 1675–87.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    A. A. Hamid and R.G. Drysdale, ‘Proposed Failure Criteria for Brick Masonry under Combined Stresses’, Proceedings of the Second North American Masonry Conference (Maryland) 1982, pp. 9.1–11.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    R. H. Atkinson and J. L. Noland, ‘A Proposed Failure Theory for Brick Masonry in Compression’, Proceedings of the Third Canadian Masonry Conference (Edmonton) 1983, pp. 5.1–17.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    E. M. F. Naguib and G. Suter, ‘Effect of Brick Stiffness Orthotropy on the Lateral Stresses in Stack-Bonded Masonry Prisms’, Proceedings of the Fourth North American Masonry Conference (Los Angeles) 1987, pp. 18.2–11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Arnold W. Hendry 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arnold W. Hendry
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of EdinburghUK
  2. 2.The British Masonry SocietyUK

Personalised recommendations