Skip to main content

Traditional Attitudes and Socialisation

  • Chapter
  • 84 Accesses

Part of the book series: Essentials of Nursing Management ((ENMS))

Abstract

In previous chapters, I have tried to clarify how nursing’s apparent failure to produce effective leaders in sufficient quantities is a product of its social and political history. Hempstead (1992) claims that nurses are prisoners of their own past — steeped in tradition, comfortable in hierarchical structures and comfortable with management in a conventional, controlled environment. In the past, matrons exercised their power through their medical colleagues, consensus management in the 1970s meant that risk-taking was uncommon, and layers of functional management tiers meant that responsibility could be avoided relatively easily. Because of the profession’s dependence upon functional structures (nurses managing nurses), leading to the confusion of management of the service with leadership (MacPherson 1991), nurses were simply not demonstrating the right skills or attitudes to make an impact after the implementation of the Griffiths recommendations in the 1980s.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agonito R (1993) No More Nice Girl — Power, Sexuality and Success in the Work place. Bob Adams. Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asplund G (1988) Women Managers — Changing Organisational Cultures. John Wiley. Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audit Commission (1997) Finders, Keepers — The Management of Staff Turnover in NHS Trusts. Audit Commission. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin J, Champion V and Tzeng O (1985) Cross-cultural comparison on nursing image. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 22 March: 231–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordwick J (1979) In Transition. Rhinehart & Winston. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle D (1991) On a fast track to the top. Nursing Times. 86(51): 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson M (1985) Reach for the Top — a Woman’s Guide to Success in Business and Management. Piatkus. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson L and Cole A (1991) A crisis of leadership? Nursing Times. 87(1): 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson M and Cooper C (1983) Stress and the Woman Manager. Martin Robertson. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson M and Cooper C (1992) Shattering the Glass Ceiling — the Woman Manager. PCR London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health and National Health Service Executive (1993) A Vision for the Future — the Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting Contribution to Health and Health Care. DoH. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman SJ (1990) Managing Lives — Corporate Women and Social Change. University of Massachusetts Press. Amherst. Cited in Davidson M and Cooper C (1992) Shattering the Glass Ceiling — the Woman Manager. PCP. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempstead N (1992) Nurse management and leadership today. Nursing Standard. 6(33): 37–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horner H (1970) Femininity and Successful Achievement: A Basic Inconsistency. Feminine Personality and Conflicts. Brookes Cole. California. Cited in Davidson M and Cooper C (1992) Shattering the Glass Ceiling — the Woman Manager. PCP. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt J (1992) Nursing leadership opportunities. Senior Nurse. 12(1): 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorentzon M (1992) Authority, leadership and management in nursing (guest editorial). Journal of Advanced Nursing. 17: 525–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacPherson W (1991) Leadership is about change. Nursing Standard. 5(36): 51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makin P, Cooper C and Cox C (1989) Managing People at Work. British Psychological Society. Leicester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall J (1984) Women Managers — Travellers in a Male World. John Wiley. Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson MF (1985) Experienced acceptability: measuring perception of dysfunctional leadership. Group and Organisational Studies. 10: 447–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petty M and Brunning N (1980) A comparison of the relationships between subordinates behaviour and measures of subordinates job satisfaction for them and for their leaders. Academy of Management Journal. 23(4): 717–25. Cited in Davidson M and Cooper C (1992) Shattering the Glass Ceiling — the Woman Manager. PCP. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell G (1988) Women and Men in Management. Sage. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson J and Strong P (1987) Professional Nursing Advice after Griffiths — an Interim Report. Warwick Nursing Policy Studies Centre. Warwick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong P and Robinson J (1988) New Model Management — Griffiths and the NHS. University of Warwick. Coventry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborg J (1977) Working women and stress. In Beehr T and Bhagat R (eds) Human Stress and Cognition in Organisations. John Wiley. Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

Additional Information

  • The Institute of Health and Care Development, St Bartholomews Court, 18 Christmas Street, Bristol BS1 5BT.

    Google Scholar 

  • RCN Nurses in Leadership Project, RCN HQ, 20 Cavendish Square, London WIM 0AB.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Executive Choice’, Dearden Management, Church Road, Redhill, Bristol BS18 7SG.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1998 June Girvin

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Girvin, J. (1998). Traditional Attitudes and Socialisation. In: Leadership and Nursing. Essentials of Nursing Management. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14698-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14698-7_7

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-72375-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-14698-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics