Advertisement

Apartheid’s Criminal Law

  • Peter Parker
  • Joyce Mokhesi-Parker

Abstract

Law is an activity for the wealthy. Robbed of wealth, the concerns of blacks became as marginal to the development of the legal system as those of the poor everywhere. We entered the courts as irritants, without status, as the dispossessed, without wealth, working in servitude and deprived of political rights. The white judges and magistrates saw us as vagrants, petty criminals, bolshie trade unionists and agitators. Fine distinctions might be drawn and close attention paid to legal construction when disputes between white interests had to be settled; black interests were pushed down into magistrates’ or commissioners’ courts and criminalised into trespass, petty theft, and pass offences.1

Keywords

Criminal Justice Public Prosecutor Criminal Procedure Supreme Court Appeal Court 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    The Masters and Servants acts ensured that prison would not be an escape route from an employer by stipulating that the length of any term of imprisonment would be added to the service laid down in the contract of employment; F. Gardiner and C. Lansdown, South African Criminal Law and Procedure, Cape Town: Juta, 1917 1254–60;Google Scholar
  2. 2a.
    J. Milton and N. Fuller, South African Criminal Law and Procedure vol III Statutory Offences, Cape Town: Juta, 1971 1009–15. When US dockers threatened to block South African coal imports, these Acts were repealed by the Second General Law Amendment Act 94 of 1974.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    For gruesome examples of employer violence in the 1920s — workers were ‘murdered for refusing to say “good day, baas”, and were shot for demanding withheld wages. They were killed by being hung upside down on a tree and thrashed to a pulp...’ — see H. Bradford, op cit 55; and for the 1890s R. Turrell, Capital and Labour on the Kimberley Diamond Fields 1871–1890, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987 172.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    The government was paid 2d per convict per day by De Beers in the 1880s — or some £700 a year; D. van Zyl Smit, ‘Public Policy and the Punishment of Crime in a Divided Society: A Historical Perspective on the South African Penal System’, (1985) 1 Natal University Law and Society Review 54–67, 63. By the end of that decade De Beers’s workforce numbered about 5000 people and the total work force in the Kimberley diamond mines around 10 000; R. Turrell, op cit 155–61.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    F. Wilson, Labour in the South African Gold Mines 1911–1969, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972 46, 163.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    T. Corry, Prison Labour in South Africa, Cape Town: National Institute for Crime Prevention and the Rehabilitation of Offenders, 1977 134. Convict labour in the mines ended in 1955.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    D. van Zyl Smit, ‘South Africa’, in D. van Zyl Smit and F. Dünkel (eds), Imprisonment Today and Tomorrow: International Perspectives on Prisoners’ Rights and Conditions, Deventer: Kluwer, 1991 537–66, 539.Google Scholar
  8. 12.
    H.L. Corder, The Truth And Nothing But, Cape Town: Juta, 1946 94.Google Scholar
  9. 15.
    D. McQuoid-Mason, An Outline of Legal Aid in South Africa, Durban: Butterworths, 1982 64–6. The review system was modified in 1977, reducing the number of cases automatically reviewed by some 60 per cent; the percentage of cases in which the judgment or sentence was altered thereby rose and in 1981 stood at 6.1 per cent in 1981;Google Scholar
  10. 15a.
    G. Hoexter, Commission of Inquiry into the Structure and Functioning of the Courts, RP 78/1983 280.Google Scholar
  11. 22.
    Police Act 14 of 1912. A detailed history of the police is provided in J. Brewer, Black and Blue: Policing in South Africa, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  12. 23.
    s 8 of the Police Act stated that the police were liable to perform military duties ‘within or outside’ the country. During the Second World War the police brigade saw action in the North African theatre at Tobruk; F. Cooper, The Police Brigade: 6th S.A. Infantry Brigade 1939–45, Cape Town: Constantia, 1972.Google Scholar
  13. 26.
    The following section is indebted to the report by Dr P. Waddington, Report on the Inquiry into the Police Response to, and Investigation of, Events in Boipatong on 17 June 1992, Submitted to the Commission of Inquiry Regarding the Prevention of Public Violence and Intimidation, the Honourable Mr Justice R. J. Goldstone, Chairman, 20 July 1992.Google Scholar
  14. 35.
    M. Dippenaar, The History of the South African Police 1913–1988, Silverton: Promedia, 1988 374.Google Scholar
  15. 38.
    P. Harris, ‘A Lawyer’s Experience’, in V. Brittain and A. Minty (eds), Children of Resistance: Statements from the Harare Conference on Children, Repression and the Law in Apartheid South Africa, London: Kliptown Books, 1988 66. During the investigation of the massacre at Boipatong (op cit 14) the investigating officer had to give assurances that suspects would not be tortured.Google Scholar
  16. 40.
    D. Hansson, ‘Selected Statistics of the South African criminal justice system: July 1988 to June 1990’, (1990) 3 SACJ 312–26, 313, 323–4.Google Scholar
  17. 41.
    D. Hansson, ‘Selected Statistics of the South African Criminal Justice System,’ (1991) 4 SACJ 344–62, 363.Google Scholar
  18. 42.
    J. Sloth-Nielsen, ‘Legal Violence: Corporal and Capital Punishment’, in B. McKendrick and W. Hoffmann (eds), People and Violence in South Africa, Cape Town: Oxford University Press, 1990 73–95, 78.Google Scholar
  19. 43.
    The figures are for the year 1970/71. J. Newman and J. Midgley, ‘Crime and Penal Statistics in South Africa’, in J. Midgley, J. Steyn, R. Graser (eds), Crime and Punishment in South Africa, Johannesburg: McGraw-Hill, 1975 3–23, 19. The imprisonment rate rose to 424 per 100 000 in 1983.Google Scholar
  20. 44.
    The figures are for those in South African gaols, excluding the homelands, as are the population figures; N. Steytler, The Undefended Accused On Trial, Cape Town: Juta, 1988 19 n84.Google Scholar
  21. 45.
    A proportion based on the 94 whites out of a total of 3228 who were executed between 1911 and 1980; E. Kahn, ‘What is Happening to the Death Penalty’, (1980) 97 SALJ 103–5, 103.Google Scholar
  22. 47.
    A. Sachs, op cit 170–4; N. Steytler, ‘Criminal Justice and the Apartheid State’, in A. Rycroft, L. Boulle, M. Robertson and P. Spiller (eds), Race and the Law in South Africa, Cape Town: Juta, 1987 68–84, 74.Google Scholar
  23. 50.
    B. van Niekerk, ‘...Hanged by the Neck until You Are Dead,’ (1969) 86 SALJ 457–75; (1970) 87 SALJ 60–75, 72 n13.Google Scholar
  24. 52.
    For the background to this legislation see W. Worger, South Africa’s City of Diamonds: Mine Workers and Monopoly Capitalism in Kimberley, 1867–1895, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987 chapter 3.Google Scholar
  25. 56.
    H. Bernstein, No. 46 — Steve Biko, London: IDAF, 1978 53.Google Scholar
  26. 58.
    B. Pottinger, The Imperial Presidency: P.W. Botha — The First Ten Years, Johannesburg: Southern, 1988 47.Google Scholar
  27. 63.
    Although the police had to state from information on oath that reasonable suspicions existed against their man, as Professor Dugard pointed out, ‘The magistrate or justice to whom an application for a warrant of arrest is made does not have to consider the correctness of the applicant’s assertion, which makes him a “mere rubber stamp” in respect of the cause of arrest (that is, the “reasonable suspicion”).’ J. Dugard, South African Criminal Law and Procedure Vol IV Introduction to Criminal Procedure, Cape Town: Juta, 1977 68.Google Scholar
  28. 65.
    A. Lansdown and J. Campbell, South African Criminal Law and Procedure Vol 5 Criminal Procedure and Evidence, Cape Town: Juta, 1982 294.Google Scholar
  29. 66.
    Commentary 5–28, citing George, NO v. Minister of Law and Order 1987 (4) SA 222 (SE) 228G–I, 229B, 230G–J, where the police successfully raised this defence in a civil action for damages but lost the case on the facts. Deadly force could also be used to defend person or property or under ss 48–9 of the Internal Security Act 74 of 1982 to disperse an unlawful gathering; N. Haysom, ‘License to Kill Part 1: The South African Police and the Use of Deadly Force’, (1987) 3 SAJHR 3–27.Google Scholar
  30. 67.
    D. Hansson, ‘Official criminal justice statistics: 1986–1987’, (1988) 1 SACJ 487–511, 504.Google Scholar
  31. 69.
    s 13(1) of the Inquest Acts Act 58 of 1959; De’Ath v. Additional Magistrate, Cape Town 1988 (4) SA 769 (C); D. Akerson, ‘An Inquest-Law Inquest’, (1989) 5 SAJHR 209–20.Google Scholar
  32. 75.
    The magistrate had to record the reason for parental absence. In 85 per cent of all cases, it was due to their living in a different magisterial district. A fifth of cases took more than four weeks to conclude. These findings are based on a survey of 500 juvenile cases tried in the white magisterial district of Durban. See D. Hutchinson, ‘Juvenile Justice’, in M. Olmesdahl and N. Steytler (eds), Criminal Justice in South Africa: Selected Aspects of Discretion, Cape Town: Juta, 1983 236–59.Google Scholar
  33. 77.
    V. Hiemstra, ‘Criminal Procedure’, in W. Joubert (ed.), The Law of South Africa Vol. 5, Durban: Butterworths, 1978 369–487 para 543.Google Scholar
  34. 79.
    s 73(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977. Reg 123(1) restricted access to a lawyer to advice on civil or criminal proceedings. As D. van Zyl Smit points out in South African Prison Law and Practice, Durban: Butterworths, 1992 239, these restrictions were ‘contrary to international standards’ and ultra vires the empowering Correctional Services Act 8 of 1959.Google Scholar
  35. 87.
    The prisons admitted an average of 450 000 sentenced and unsentenced people every year; N. Steytler, op cit 19 n.84; D. Hansson, ‘Official Criminal Justice Statistics: 1986–1987’, (1988) 1 SACJ 303–317, 315.Google Scholar
  36. 91.
    s 186 of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 required a court to summon witnesses, if such testimony ‘appears to the court essential to the just decision of the case’, a provision whose effect was to give the prosecution a chance to counter defence testimony; L. Hoffmann and D. Zeffertt, The South African Law Of Evidence (4th ed.), Durban: Butterworths, 1988 471–4.Google Scholar
  37. 92.
    J. Bentham, A Treatise on Judicial Evidence (1825 ed.) reprinted Littleton, Colorado: Rothman, 1981 241.Google Scholar
  38. 95.
    The words are those of an English judge, Judge Farquharson and are quoted by R. Alexander, ‘An Independent Bar’, (1988) 105 SALJ 54–66, 62.Google Scholar
  39. 96.
    J. van der Berg, ‘The duty of prosecutors to disclose inconsistent statements by state witnesses — S v. Xaba 1983 (3) SA 717 (A)’, (1984) 8 SACC 204–7, 204.Google Scholar
  40. 99.
    A practice criticised in the Hoexter report which sought unsuccessfully to make magistrates independent of the government. Judge A.J. Milne also criticised the government for not allowing magistrates independence; A. Milne, ‘Speech to the Natal Law Society’, (1980) 97 SALJ 453–63, 458.Google Scholar
  41. 106.
    Details based on a survey of a hundred and five people convicted of serious offences, sixty-nine of them murder; D. van Zyl Smit and N. Isakow, ‘The Decision on How to Plead: A Study of Plea Negotiation in Supreme Court Criminal Matters’, (1986) 10 SACC 3–20, 9, who note that 7 per cent of advocates in this sample were not acting pro deo, and all of these saw their clients for than one hour before the trial started.Google Scholar
  42. 113.
    These restrictions are reprinted in D. McQuoid-Mason, An Outline of Legal Aid in South Africa 225–6; and L. Berat, ‘Legal Aid and the Indigent Accused in South Africa: A Proposal for Reform’, (1988) 18 Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 239–92, 265.Google Scholar
  43. 130.
    As Doreen McBarnet has incisively shown in Britain in Conviction: Law, the State and the Construction of Justice, London: Macmillan, 1981. The problem was briefly mentioned by the Human Sciences Research Council, op cit 134, which reported that on the basis of research it had commissioned on communication in court ‘it was concluded that coloureds were less able to structure their evidence according to coherent narratives than were whites’.Google Scholar
  44. 132.
    s 6(2) of the Magistrates’ Court Act 32 of 1944 and rule 61(1) of the Supreme Court rules; J. Bekker, ‘A Juridical Tower of Babel’, (1982) 6 SACC 241–5.Google Scholar
  45. 137.
    N. Steytler, ‘Implementing Language Rights in Court: The Role of the Court Interpreter’, (1993) 9 SAJHR 205–22, 221.Google Scholar
  46. 150.
    The defence did not object to the transformation of the most famous hymn in Africa into a battle cry, though five years later the attorney in the case was to ridicule it in his book; P. Diar, The Sharpeville Six, Toronto: McClelland & Stewart, 1990 127.Google Scholar
  47. 155.
    S v. Yantolo 1977 (2) SA 146 (E); N. Steytler, The Undefended Accused on Trial 96–7. She successfully appealed against the conviction, though she was in gaol for fifteen months before her case was reviewed. For other similar cases see N. Steytler, ‘The Too Speedy Trial — or the Right to be Prepared for Trial’, (1985) 9 SACC 158–63.Google Scholar
  48. 157.
    D. van Zyl Smit and N. Isakow, ‘Assessors and Criminal Justice’, (1985) 1 SAJHR 218–35, 234, discussed at 166–7, 349n. 10. The observation concerned the likelihood of a case warranting the death penalty and therefore requiring the appointment of assessors.Google Scholar
  49. 174.
    S v. Tsotsobe, Shabangu and Moise cc 154/81 Transvaal Supreme Court June–August 1981 in J. Dugard et al. (eds), A Report on the Rabie Report, Johannesburg: Centre For Applied Legal Studies, University of Witwatersrand, 1982 57–8. Their sentences were commuted and the men were released in the amnesty for political prisoners in 1990.Google Scholar
  50. 175.
    R v. Mokoena 1932 OPD 79, 80; J. van der Berg, ‘Treason: Evaluating the Evidence of Political Detainees’, 1985 (9) SACC 252–63; contrary views L. Hoffmann and D. Zeffertt, op cit 273–5; Commentary 24–1 to 24–2.Google Scholar
  51. 182.
    S v. Mpetha 1983 (4) SA 262 (C) 265F; A. Skeen, ‘The Decision to Discharge an Accused at the Conclusion of the State Case: A Critical Analysis’, (1985) 102 SALJ 286–94.Google Scholar
  52. 189.
    E. Grant, ‘Protective Custody of Juvenile Witnesses’, (1989) 5 SAJHR 221–9, 222. The case (Durban and Coast Local Division, 17 October 1988 cc 176/88) was unreported.Google Scholar
  53. 208.
    On this general topic, P. Suedfeld, ‘Torture: A Brief Overview’, in P. Suedfeld (ed.), Psychology and Torture, New York: Hemisphere Publishing Corp., 1990 1–11.Google Scholar
  54. 209.
    Sir James Fitzjames Stephen, A History of the Criminal Law of England, London: Macmillan, 1883, 1:442 n1;Google Scholar
  55. 209a.
    John Langbein’s lucid essay, Torture and the Law of Proof: Europe and England in the Ancien Regime, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977 147 n14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 217.
    Rules 2, 8, reprinted by P. Visser, ‘Police’, in W. Joubert and T. Scott (eds), The Law of South Africa Vol 20, Durban: Butterworths, 1984 267–443 para. 331.Google Scholar
  57. 218.
    V. Hiemstra, ‘Abolition of the Right not to be Questioned: A Practical Suggestion for Reform in Criminal Procedure’, (1963) 80 SALJ 187–218, 206. Although in 1989 the Appellate Division warned that non-compliance with the rules would ‘in many cases, materially assist the accused in discharging the onus of establishing that a confession has been improperly obtained’, it did not back up this declaration by finding that the rules actually had been breached; S v. Sampson 1989 (3) SA 239 (A) 244B–C.Google Scholar
  58. 219.
    For the minutes of just such a meeting in Nazi Germany, I. Müller, Hitler’s Justice: The Courts of the Third Reich, London: I.B. Tauris, 1991 178–80.Google Scholar
  59. 220.
    The Commissioner of Police did state in his 1987 annual report that the police served ‘the King of Law and Order — Jesus Christ’. G. Cawthra, South Africa’s Police: From police state to democratic policy?, London: Catholic Institute for International Relations, 1992 7.Google Scholar
  60. 221.
    See generally R. Cross and C. Tapper, Cross on Evidence (6th ed.), London: Butterworths, 1985 431–4;Google Scholar
  61. 221a.
    A. Zuckerman, The Principles of Criminal Evidence, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989 343–60;Google Scholar
  62. 221b.
    for a South African perspective A. Skeen, ‘The Admissibility of Improperly Obtained Evidence in Criminal Trials’, (1988) 1 SACJ 389–405; L. Hoffmann and D. Zeffertt, op cit 278–81.Google Scholar
  63. 246.
    The Appellate Division quashed the conviction and ordered a retrial on an amended charge; S v. Augustine 1980 (1) SA 503 (A) 505H–506A; J. van der Berg, ‘Judicial Notice or Racial Claptrap’, (1986) 103 SALJ 550–4. In 1987 a senior state advocate in the Attorney-General’s office in Bloemfontein wrote to the South African Law Journal stating that ‘the observation made by the Chief Justice is not invalid.’ (1987) 104 SALJ 204.Google Scholar
  64. 249.
    A. Clare, Psychiatry in Dissent: Controversial Issues in Thought and Practice, (2nd ed.), London: Tavistock Publications, 1980 129–39.Google Scholar
  65. 251.
    Article 6, cited and translated by H. Berman and J. Spindler, Soviet Criminal Law and Procedure: The RSFSR Codes (2nd edn), Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1972 22. As if that were not enough article 7 allowed the courts to punish those ‘who represent a danger because of their connection with a criminal environment or because of their past activity’.Google Scholar
  66. 252.
    The Nazi Act of 28 June 1935 cited and translated by G. Williams, Criminal Law. The General Part (2nd edn), London: Stevens, 1961 577.Google Scholar
  67. 256.
    S v. Chretien 1981 (1) SA 1097 (A) 1106B–C per Rumpff, CJ translated by J. Burchell, ‘Intoxication and the Criminal Law’, (1981) 98 SALJ 177–93, 184.Google Scholar
  68. 259.
    Abbott, CJ in 1825 (2C & P 113), cited by G. Williams, Textbook of Criminal Law (2nd ed.), London: Stevens, 1983 451.Google Scholar
  69. 261.
    A. Rabie, ‘Aspects of the Distinction between Ignorance or Mistake of Fact and Ignorance or Mistake of Law in Criminal Law’, (1985) 48 THRHR 332–43.Google Scholar
  70. 266.
    ibid 496–7, translated by E. Cameron, ‘Legal Chauvinism, Executive Mindedness and Justice — L.C. Steyn’s Impact on South African Law’, (1982) 99 SALJ 38–75, 71.Google Scholar
  71. 269.
    S v. Van Niekerk 1912 (3) SA 711 (A); J. Dugard, Human Rights and the South African Legal Order 292–302; E. Mureinik, ‘Law and Morality in South Africa’, (1988) 105 SALJ 457–69, 462–4, discussing the treatment of Edwin Cameron.Google Scholar
  72. 271.
    To C. Forsyth, ‘Motes and Beams’, (1989) 106 SALJ 374–85, 378.Google Scholar
  73. 273.
    E. Kahn, Fiat Justifia: Essays in Memory of Oliver Deneys Schreiner, Cape Town: Juta, 1983 44–5; C. Forsyth, op cit 24–5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Peter Parker and Joyce Mokhesi-Parker 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Parker
  • Joyce Mokhesi-Parker

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations