Skip to main content

Liberalization and Regulation of Network Utilities

  • Chapter
Contemporary Economic Issues

Part of the book series: International Economic Association Series ((IEA))

  • 91 Accesses

Abstract

Network utilities are public utilities which require a fixed network to deliver their services, and include gas, electricity, water, rail and fixed link telephony. These networks are durable, capital-intensive, and, with the possible exception of rail, serve mass markets and provide essential services. As a consequence these networks must be regulated if privately owned, but are often publicly owned, either by political preference, or by default because private investors lack confidence in the stability of regulation to supply the services at an acceptable price.

Support from the British Economic and Social Research Council under the project R000 23 3766 The Impact of Electricity Privatization on the British Energy Markets is gratefully acknowledged. I am indebted to Richard Green for comments and earlier collaboration from the anonymous referees are also gratefully acknowledged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Armstrong, M., S. Cowan and J. Vickers (1994) Regulatory Reform — Economic Analysis and British Experience (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, S. V. and J. Tschirhart (1988) Natural Monopoly Regulation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boardman, H. G. (1986) ‘Elements of Market Power in the Natural Gas Pipeline Industry’, The Energy Journal, vol. 7, no. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, P. and T. G. Weyman-Jones (1994) ‘Regulatory Incentives, Privatisation, and Productivity Growth in UK Electricity Distribution’, mimeo (London: Centre for the Study of Regulated Industries).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushnell, J. and S. Stoft (1996) ‘Electric Grid Investment under a Contract Network Regime’, Journal of Regulatory Economics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covarrubias, A. J. and S. B. Maia, (1994) Reforms and Private Participation in the Power Sector of Selected Latin American and Caribbean and Industrialized Countries, Vol II, World Bank Latin American and Caribbean Technical Department, Report 33, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, R. W. (1983) Controlling Industrial Pollution: The Economics and Politics of Clean Air (Washington D.C: Brookings Institution).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, R. W. (1993) After the Breakup: U.S. Telecommunications in a More Competitive Era, (Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellig, J. (1991) ‘Endogenous Change and the Economic Theory of Regulation’, Journal of Regulatory Economics, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 265–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foreman-Peck, J. and R. Millward (1994) Public and Private Ownership of British Industry 1820–1990 (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frantz, R. S. (1988) X-efficiency: Theory, Evidence and Applications (Norwell, Mass., Dordrecht and Lancaster: Kluwer Academic).

    Google Scholar 

  • Galal, A. (1994) ‘Chilgener’, ch 9, and ‘Enersis’, ch 10 in Galal, A., L. Jones, P. Tandon and I. Vogelsang (1994) Welfare Consequences of Selling Public Enterprises: An Empirical Analysis (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gentzoglanis, A. (1993) ‘Entry and Competition in the Canadian Telecommunications Industry: The Case of Alberta Government Telephones’, Atlantic Economic Journal, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 38–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, R. J. and J. Henly (1991) ‘The Value of Rate Reform in a Competitive Electric Power Market’, in Gilbert, R. (ed.), Regulatory Choices: A Perspective on Developments in Energy Policy (Berkeley: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, R. J. and D. M. Newbery (1988) ‘Regulation Games’, CEPR Discussion Paper no. 267, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, R. J. and D. M. Newbery (1994) ‘The Dynamic Efficiency of Regulatory Constitutions’, The Rand Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. J. (1992). ‘Contracts and the Pool: The British Electricity Market’, DAE, August (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. J. (1998) ‘The Electricity Contract Market in England and Wales’, Journal of Industrial Economics, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. J. and D. M. Newbery (1992) ‘Competition in the British Electricity Spot Market’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 100, no. 5, October, pp. 929–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henck, F. W. and B. Strassburg (1988) A Slippery Slope: The Long Road to the Breakup of AT&T (Westport, Conn. and London: Greenwood Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, W. (1992) ‘Contract Networks for Electric Power Transmission’, Journal of Regulatory Economics, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 211–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEA (1994) Natural Gas Transportation: Organisation and Regulation (Paris: IEA/OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L., P. Tandon and I. Vogelsang (1990) Selling Public Enterprises: A Cost—Benefit Methodology (Cambridge: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, P. L. and N. L. Rose (1989) ‘Effects of Economic Regulation’, ch. 25 in Schmalensee R. and R. Willig (eds), Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol 2 (Amsterdam: Elsevier).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, E. (1991) ‘Risks in Independent Power Contracts: An Empirical Survey’, The Electricity Journal vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 30–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, E. and R. J. Gilbert (1996) ‘Competition and Industrial Change in US Electric Power Regulation’, ch. 5 in Kahn, E. and R. J. Gilbert (eds), International Comparisons of Electricity Regulation (New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, F. P. (1991) ‘Network Routing’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. A 337, pp. 343–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, J-J. and J. Tirole (1993) A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moen, J. (1995) Electricity Utility Regulation, Structure and Competition. Experiences from the Norwegian Electric Supply Industry (Oslo: Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Administration).

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbery, D. M. (1989) ‘Missing Markets: Consequences and Remedies’, in Hahn, F. H. (ed.), Economics of Missing Markets, Information, and Games, (Oxford: Clarendon Press), ch. 10, pp. 211–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbery, D. M. (1992) ‘The Role of Public Enterprises in the National Economy’, Asian Economic Review, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbery, D. M. (1995) ‘Power Markets and Market Power’, Energy Journal, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 41–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbery, D. M. and Green, R. (1996) ‘Regulation, Public Ownership and Privatisation of the English Electricity Industry’, ch. 2 in Kahn, E. and R.J. Gilbert (eds), International Comparisons of Electricity Regulation (New York: Cambridge University Press) pp. 25–81.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Newbery, D. M. and M. Pollitt, ‘The Restructuring and Privatisation of the CEGB — Was It Worth It?’ Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 145, no. 3, pp. 269–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noam, E. M. (1993) ‘Assessing the Impacts of Divestiture and Deregulation in Telecommunications’, Southern Economic Journal, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 438–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noll, R. G. (1989) ‘The Politics of Regulation’, ch. 22, in Schmalensee and R. Willig (eds), Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 2 (Amsterdam: Elsevier).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (1976) ‘Toward a More General Theory of Regulation’, Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 19, pp. 211–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Arriaga, I. (1994) The Organisation and Operation of the Electricity Supply Industry in Argentina (London: Energy Economic Engineering Ltd).

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R. A. (1971) ‘Taxation by Regulation’, Bell Journal of Economics, vol. 2, pp. 22–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Primeaux, W. J. (1977) ‘An Assessment of X-Efficiency Gained through Competition’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 59, no. 1, February, pp. 105–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Primeaux, W. J. (1978) ‘The Effect of Competition on Capacity Utilization in the Electric Utility Industry’, Economic Inquiry, April, pp. 237–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey, W. W. (1982) The Theory of Natural Monopoly (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, R. (1989) The Regulation of Monopoly (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, R. T. and Ying, J. S. (1992) ‘Unnatural Monopolies in Local Telephone’, Rand Journal of Economics, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 171–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweppe, E., M. Caramanis, R. Tabors, and R. Bohn (1988) Spot Pricing of Electricity (Lancaster: Kluwer Academic Publishers).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spiller, P. (1993) ‘Institutions and Regulatory Commitment in Utilities’ Privatization’, Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 317–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiller, P. (1994) ‘Contracts, Administrative Law or Regulatory Specificity: Workable Regulatory Frameworks for Developing Economies’, Washington DC: Institute for Policy Reform, Working Paper IPR 97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spring, P. (1995) ‘The Restructured Gas Industry 1994/95’, ch. 3 in Regulatory Review 1995 (London: Centre for the Study of Regulated Industries).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, J. (1994) ‘Gas Regulation and the MMC Review 1993’, ch. 2 in Regulatory Review 1994 (London Centre for the Study of Regulated Industries).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, R.E. (1982) ‘X-Inefficiency and Interfirm Rivalry: Evidence from the Electric Utility Industry’, Land Economics, February, pp. 52–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. (1971) ‘The Theory of Economic Regulation’, Bell Journal of Economic and Management Science, vol. 3, pp. 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temin, P. and L. Galambos, (1987) The Fall of the Bell System: A Study in Prices and Politics (Cambridge, New York and Sydney: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, J. and G. Yarrow (1988) Privatization: An Economic Analysis (London: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogelsang, I. (1990) Public Enterprise in Monopolistic and Oligopolistic Industries (Chur, Russia: Harwood Academic Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, R. (1986) ‘A Model of Public Enterprise with Entry’, Canadian Journal of Economics, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 642–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whish, R. (1995) ‘Regulatory Processes and the Law’, ch. 11 in Vass. P. (ed.), Regulatory Review 1995 (London: Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1999 International Economic Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Newbery, D.M. (1999). Liberalization and Regulation of Network Utilities. In: Sertel, M.R. (eds) Contemporary Economic Issues. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14540-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics