Wear and wear-out

  • A. D. S. Carter
Chapter

Abstract

Wear-out is a much more intractable subject than stress rupture, if only because of the literally hundreds of different wear processes that can lead to failure. In spite of this, a common approach to all wear mechanisms is highly desirable, otherwise design methodology becomes a never-ending topic. A common approach is certainly the target of this book. In principle this is readily achieved, because the methodology of stress-rupture can be carried over to deal with any wear. The only change in the mathematics is a representation of the ‘damage’ done by each load application; and for those items that survive, the derivation of a new strength with which to assess the reliability of the next load application — and so on.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adam, T., Dickson, R.F., Jones, C.J., Reiter, H. and Harris, B. (1986) A power law fatigue damage model for fibre-reinforced plastic laminates. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 200 (C3), 158–166.Google Scholar
  2. Bompas-Smith, J.H. (1969) The determination of distributions that describe the failures of mechanical components. Eighth Annals of Reliability and Maintainability, pp. 343–356.Google Scholar
  3. Bore, C.L. (1956) The presentation of fatigue data for fatigue life calculations. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, 60, 321–346.Google Scholar
  4. Carter, A.D.S. (1986) Mechanical Reliability, 2nd edn, Macmillan Press, Basingstoke.Google Scholar
  5. Cicci, F. (1964) An investigation of the statistical distribution of constant amplitude endurances for a maraging steel, UTIUS Tech Note No. 73, UTIUS, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Evans, R.W. and Wilshire, B. (1993) Introduction to Creep, The Institute of Metals, London.Google Scholar
  7. Kecicioglu, D.B. (1972) Reliability analysis of mechanical components and systems. Nuclear Engineering, 19, 250–290.Google Scholar
  8. Manson, S.S. (1966) Thermal Stress and Low-cycle Fatigue, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Miller, K.J. (1986) Retrospective and prospective views of fatigue research, in Conference on Fatigue of Engineering Materials and Structures, Vol. 1, Institution of Mechanical Engineers, London, pp. 6–11.Google Scholar
  10. Miller, K.J. (1991) Metal fatigue — past, current and future, Twenty Seventh John Player Lecture. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 205, 1–14.Google Scholar
  11. Nixon, F. (1971) Managing to Achieve Quality and Reliability, McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead.Google Scholar
  12. Talreja, R. (1979) On fatigue reliability under random loads. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 11, 717–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wong, K.L. (1991) The physical basis of roller coaster hazard rate curves for electronics. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 7, 489–495. Also contains references to two companion papers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© A.D.S. Carter 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. D. S. Carter
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Royal Military College of ScienceUK
  2. 2.University of WalesSwanseaUK

Personalised recommendations