Local-to-Local Partnerships among Swedish Municipalities: Why and How Neighbours Join to Alleviate Resource Constraints

  • Lennart J. Lundqvist


Networks are important institutional features in local community affairs. They function as information centres and bargaining structures in politics. Through networks, local political actors can furthermore build a reputation which becomes an asset — sometimes even a form of veto power — in the decision-making process (Knoke 1990: 133, 138-9). Elected municipal leaders hold central positions vis-à-vis important local groups and organizations, and are at the hub of important inter-organizational relationships in the community. From this central institutional position, they engage in strategic activities to establish contacts with, and to create networks among, the important holders and/or claimants to resources deemed necessary to fulfil political objectives. Politicians must particularly strive to establish such relations with individual and collective resource holders over whom they have limited political leverage. Networking can thus be seen as a strategy of using contacts to gain influence over structural factors in the local government’s environment, first and foremost in order to alleviate the eternal problem of scarcity and resource dependence (Pierre 1994: 163f). Looking at networking as a strategic activity implies that there is a dubious relationship between networks, networking, and cooperation.


Local Government Common Pool Resource Resource Sustainability Mutual Agreement Resource Mobilization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baumol, W. J. and W. E. Oates (1975), The Theory of Environmental Policy (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall).Google Scholar
  2. Buchanan, J. M. and G. Tullock (1962), The Calculus of Consent (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar
  3. Klason, L.-E. (1974), Kommunalförbund och demokrati [Municipal Associations and Democracy], Stockholm Studies in Politics, 5 (Stockholm: Department of Political Science).Google Scholar
  4. Knoke, D. (1990), Political Networks: The Structural Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Libecap, G. D. (1995), ‘The Conditions for Successful Collective Action’, pp. 161–90 in R. O. Keohane and E. Ostrom (eds), Local Commons and Global Interdependence (London, Thousand Oaks, CA, and New Delhi: Sage).Google Scholar
  6. Lundqvist, L. J. (1994), ‘Environmental Cooperation among Swedish Local Governments: Professional Networks and the Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action’, International Journal of Public Administration 17: 1733–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Olson, M. (1965), The Logic of Collective Action (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  8. Ostrom, E. (1990), Governing the Commons (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pierre, J. (1994), Den lokala staten [The Local State] (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell).Google Scholar
  10. Schmidt, S. (1986), Pionjärer, efterföljare, avvaktare [Pioneers, Followers and Hesitators] (Lund: Kommunfakta Förlag).Google Scholar
  11. Swedish Association of Local Authorities (1993), Kommunernas samverkan hösten 1993 (Stockholm: Svenska Kommunförbundet).Google Scholar
  12. Swedish Code of Statutes (SFS) 1985 #894 Lag om kommunalförbund.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lennart J. Lundqvist

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations