Advertisement

The Status of Marx’s Reproduction Schemes: Conventional or Dialectical Logic?

  • Geert Reuten

Abstract

Marx’s Capital is an unfinished project, in the narrower sense of the plan for the work with this title, dating from 1862, and even more so in the wider sense of a theory of the interconnection of economy and state and of the development of world capitalism. The evaluation of what is there obviously depends on the method adopted by Marx, but opinions diverge on the interpretation of that method.1

Keywords

Social Capital Fixed Capital Simple Reproduction Individual Capital Dialectical Logic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arthur, Christopher J. (1993) ‘Hegel’s Logic and Marx’s Capital’, in F. Moseley (ed.) pp. 63–87.Google Scholar
  2. Backhaus, Hans-Georg (1969) ‘Zur Dialektik der Wertform’, in A. Schmidt (ed.) Beiträge zur Marxistischen Erkenntnistheorie, Frankfurt a.M.; Engl. trans. M. Eldred and M. Roth, ‘On the Dialectics of the Value-form’, Thesis Eleven, 1, 1980: 99–120.Google Scholar
  3. Backhaus, Hans-Georg (1992) ‘Between philosophy and science: Marxian social economy as critical theory’, in W. Bonefeld, R. Gunn & K. Psychopedis (eds), Open Marxism, Volume I, Dialectics and History, Pluto Press, London/Boulder, pp. 54–92.Google Scholar
  4. Boumans, Marcel (1997) ‘Built-in justification’, Amsterdam Working Papers in the History and Methodology of Economics, University of Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics.Google Scholar
  5. Desai, Meghnad (1979) Marxian Economics, Basil Blackwell Oxford.Google Scholar
  6. Eldred, Michael (1984) Critique of Competitive Freedom and the Bourgeois-democratic state: outline of a form-analytic extension of Marx’s uncompleted system, Kurasje, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  7. Eldred, Michael, Marnie Hanlon, Lucia Kleiber & Mike Roth (1982/85, 1984) Reconstructing Value-Form Analysis 1–4, Thesis Eleven, no. 4, 1982; no. 7, 1983; no. 9, 1984; no. 11, 1985; modified as, ‘A Value-form analytic reconstruction of “Capital”, Appendix to M. Eldred, 1984: 350–487.Google Scholar
  8. Foley, Duncan K. (1986) Understanding Capital; Marx’s Economic Theory, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass./London.Google Scholar
  9. Gehrke, Christian & Heinz D. Kurz (1995) ‘Karl Marx on physiocracy’, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought vol. 2, No. 1:53–90.Google Scholar
  10. Harris, Donald J. (1972) ‘On Marx’s scheme of reproduction and accumulation’, Journal of Political Economy, 80/3-I, pp. 503–22.Google Scholar
  11. Hegel, G.W.F. (1812, 1831) Wissenschaft der Logik; Engl, trans of the 1923, Lasson edn A.V. Miller, Hegel’s Science of Logic, Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, NJ, 1989.Google Scholar
  12. Hegel, G.W.F. (1817, 1830) Enzyklopädie der Philosophischen Wissenschaften in Grundrisse I, Die Wissenschaft der Logik, Engl. trans of the 3rd edn, T.F. Geraets, W.A. Suchting and H.S. Harris, The Encyclopaedia Logic, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis/Cambridge, 1991.Google Scholar
  13. Horowitz, David (ed.) (1968) Marx and Modern Economics, Monthly Review Press, New York/London.Google Scholar
  14. Kaldor, N. (1955/6) ‘Alternative theories of distribution’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 23: 94–100; reprinted in A. Sen (ed.), Growth Economics, Penguin Books Harmondsworth, 1970, pp. 81–91.Google Scholar
  15. Kalecki, M. (1935, 1952) ‘A macroeconomic theory of business cycles’, Econometrica, July 1935; revised as ‘The determinants of profits’, Theory of Economic Dynamics, Kelley, New York, 1969.Google Scholar
  16. Koshimura, Shinzaburo (1975) Theory of Capital Reproduction and Accumulation, ed. J.G. Schwartz, Engl. trans. Toshihiro Ataka, Dumont Press Graphix, Kitchener (Ontario); first published, in Japanese, in 1956.Google Scholar
  17. Klein, Lawrence R. (1947) ‘Theories of effective demand and employment’, Journal of Political Economy, April; reprinted in David Horowitz (1968, pp. 138–75).Google Scholar
  18. Leontief, Wassily (1938) ‘The significance of Marxian economics for present-day economic theory’, American Economic Review Supplement, vol. 28, No. 1, March; reprinted in David Horowitz (1968, pp. 88–99).Google Scholar
  19. Mandel, Ernest (1978) ‘Introduction’ to Marx (1885), English trans. Fernbach, pp. 11–79.Google Scholar
  20. Marx, Karl (1867, 1890) Das Kapital Kritik der Politischen Okonomie, Band I, Der Produktionsprozess der Kapitals, Engl. trans. Ben Fowkes, Capital, A Critique of Political Economy, Volume One, Penguin Books Harmondsworth, 1976.Google Scholar
  21. Marx, Karl (1885, 1893) ed. F. Engels, Das Kapital, Kritik der Politischen Okonomie, Band II, Der Zirkulationsprozess des Kapitals, MEW 24, Dietz Verlag, Berlin, 1972; Engl. trans. David Fernbach, Capital, A Critique of Political Economy Vol II, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, 1978.Google Scholar
  22. Marx, Karl (1894) ed. F. Engels, Das Kapital, Kritik der Politischen Okonomie, Band III, Der Gesamtprozesz der kapitalistischen Produktion, MEW 25, Dietz Verlag, Berlin, 1972; Engl. trans. David Fernbach, Capital, A Critique of Political Economy, Vol III, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, 1981.Google Scholar
  23. Marx, Karl (1904/10, 1956/66) ed. K. Kautsky, Theorien über den Mehrwert (1904/10); selections first translated 1951 by G.A. Bonner & E. Burns; 2nd edition (1956/66) by Institut für Marxismus-Leninismus, Theorien über den Mehrwert Teile I, II, III, MEW 26.1, 26.2, 26.3, Dietz Verlag, Berlin, 1973, 1972, 1972; Engl. edn: Theories of Surplus Value, Part I, ed. S. Ryazanskaya, trans. E. Burns (1963); Part II, ed. and trans. S. Ryazanskaya (1968); Part III, ed. S.W. Ryazanskaya & R. Dixon, trans. J. Cohen & S.W. Ryazanskaya (1971), Lawrence & Wishart, London, 1969, 1969, 1972.Google Scholar
  24. Morishima, Michio (1973) Marx’s Economics; A dual theory of value and growth, Cambridge/New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Moseley, Fred (ed.) (1993) Marx’s Method in ‘Capital’: A reexamination, Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, NJ.Google Scholar
  26. Murray, Patrick (1988) Marx’s Theory of Scientific Knowledge, Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, NJ/London, 1990.Google Scholar
  27. Oakley, Allen (1983) The Making of Marx’s Critical Theory: A Bibliographical Analysis, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  28. Reuten, Geert (1993) ‘The difficult labour of a theory of social value; metaphors and systematic dialectics at the beginning of Marx’s Capital’, in F. Moseley (ed.) pp. 89–113.Google Scholar
  29. Reuten, Geert (1995) ‘Conceptual collapses; a note on value-form theory’, Review of Radical Political Economics, vol.27, no. 3:104–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reuten, Geert & Michael Williams (1989) Value-Form and the State: the tendencies of accumulation and the determination of economic policy in capitalist society, Routledge, London/New York.Google Scholar
  31. Robinson, Joan (1948) ‘Marx and Keynes’ (in Italian for Critica Economica, 1948); in J. Robinson, Collected Economic Papers I, Oxford, 1950; reprinted in David Horowitz (1968, pp. 103–16).Google Scholar
  32. Robinson, Joan (1951) ‘Introduction’ to Rosa Luxemburg (1913), The Accumulation of Capital, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1971, pp. 13–28.Google Scholar
  33. Smith, Tony (1990) The Logic of Marx’s Capital: Replies to Hegelian Criticisms, State University of New York Press, Albany.Google Scholar
  34. Smith, Tony (1993) ‘Marx’s Capital: and Hegelian Dialectical Logic’, in F. Moseley (ed. pp. 15–36).Google Scholar
  35. Williams, Michael (1998) ‘Money and Labour-Power: Marx after Hegel, or Smith plus Sraffa?’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 22, no. 3 (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Geert Reuten 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geert Reuten

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations