Skip to main content

Possible Evolution of the US—ROK Military Relationship

  • Chapter
  • 18 Accesses

Abstract

In the past, the United States kept a large number of troops in Asia to contain the Soviet Union and to maintain its influence. Although there have been suggestions that there should be a reduction in the size of US forces with the end of the Cold War, the United States has made it clear that it will keep a military presence in the Asian region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Sheldon W. Simon, ‘Pacific Rim Reactions to US Military Strategy’, in Young Whan Kihl and Lawrence E. Grinter (eds), Security, Strategy, and Policy Responses in the Pacific Rim (Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1989), p. 82.

    Google Scholar 

  2. US House, The 600-ship Navy and The Maritime Strategy, Hearings, Seapower and strategic and critical material subcommittee, Committee on Armed Services, 99th Congress, 1st Session, 24 June, 5, 6, 10 September (Washington, DC: GPO, 1986), p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Joseph Metcalf, ‘The US Maritime Strategy in Transition’, in John Pay and Geoffrey Till, East-West Relations in the 1990s: The Naval Dimension (London: Pinter Publishers, 1990), p. 187.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sam Nunn, Nunn 1990: A New Military Strategy, Significant Issues Series, Vol. XII, No. 5 (Washington, DC: CSIS, 1990), pp. 54–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. US Senate, Approaches To Naval Arms Control, Hearings, Subcommittee on projection forces and regional defense, Committee on Armed Services, 101st Congress, 2nd Session (Washington, DC: GPO, 1990), p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  6. William J. Crowe, Jr. and Alan D. Romberg, ‘Rethinking Security In The Pacific’, Foreign Affairs, Spring 1991, pp. 124–36.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Offense—Defense Working Group, The Future of Containment: America’s Options For Defending Its interests On The Soviet Periphery, Report submitted to the Commission on Integrated Long-term Strategy (Washington, DC: GPO, 1988), p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  8. US Department of Defense, A Strategic Framework For The Asian Pacific Rim: Looking Toward The 21st Century (Washington, DC: GPO, 1990), p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  9. James Eberle, ‘Global security and naval arms control’, Survival, July/August 1990, p. 330; Alan D. Romberg, The Future of US Alliance with Japan and Korea, Critical issues 1990 (New York: Council of Foreign Relations, 1990), pp. 26–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Paul H. Kreisberg, ‘US Political—Military Policy in the Asia—Pacific’, in Dora Alves (ed.), Change, Interdependence And Security In The Pacific Basin, The 1990 Pacific Symposium (Washington, DC: National Defense University Press, 1991), p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Selig S. Harrison and Clyde V. Prestowitz, Jr., ‘Pacific Agenda: Defense or Economics’, Foreign Policy, Summer 1990, No. 79, p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  12. In a responding letter to Taylor and Mazarr, he said ‘we have nothing to fear from North Korea. North Korea threatens South Korea, not the United States.’ Doug Bandow, ‘Letters’, Foreign Policy, Summer 1990, pp. 187–8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Doug Bandow, ‘Leaving Korea’, Foreign Policy, Winter 1989–90, pp. 84–6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. William J. Crowe, Jr. and Alan D. Romberg, ‘Rethinking Security in the Pacific’, Foreign Affairs, Spring 1991, p. 133.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Robert J. Art, ‘A Defensible Defense’, International Security, Spring 1991, p. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  16. William J. Taylor, Jr. and Michael J. Mazarr, ‘ROK—US Defense Cooperation in the Context of Arms Control’, Michael J. Mazarr, John Q. Blodgett, Cha Young-Koo and William J. Taylor, Jr. (eds), Korea 1991: The Road to Peace (Boulder: Westview Press, 1991), p. 165.

    Google Scholar 

  17. William J. Taylor, Jr. and Michael J. Mazarr, ‘Letters’, Foreign Policy, Summer 1990, p. 188.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1996 Kim Jung-Ik

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jung-Ik, K. (1996). Possible Evolution of the US—ROK Military Relationship. In: The Future of the US-Republic of Korea Military Relationship. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13910-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics