The Surface Quality of Hipped Gamma Titanium Aluminide Bar after Turning

  • H. Zang
  • M. L. H. Wise
  • D. K. Aspinwall


This paper reports a study of the surface morphology and integrity of HIPped Ti-48A1-2Mn-2Nb bars after turning. The machining experiments were carried out using statistically designed tests to investigate the effect of a range of cutting conditions and different cemented carbide tool grades on surface finish. Cracks and cavities were found in the machined surfaces after turning under roughing and semi-finishing conditions which is a matter of concern considering the low ductility of this material and the likely significance of defects on brittle failure. It was found that the cracks were associated with microstructural features such as γ lamellae or γ grain boundaries and originated from the deformed layer observed at the surface under all machining conditions. The depth of cracks was found to vary with depth-of-cut and feed rate and their cause is probably dependent on surface temperatures and stresses generated in machining. Microhardness measurements indicated that there was a hardened layer at the surface.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    C.T. Liu and J.O. Stiegler (1990) Ordered intermetallics, Metals Handbook 2, Tenth edition, Properties and Selection: Non-ferrous alloys and Special Purpose Materials, ASM, p. 913Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Y-W Kim (July, 1994) Ordered intermetallic alloys, Part III: gamma titanium aluminides, JOM, 46, p. 30Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.C. Chesnutt and J.C. Williams (August, 1990) Titanium aluminides for advanced aircraft engines, Defence and Aerospace, 6, p. 509Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Zhang, M.L.H. Wise, D.K. Aspinwall and E.M. Aspinwall (October, 1994) Investigation of machinability of as-HIPed gamma titanium aluminide, ASM Materials Week ‘84, Chicago, Materials Issues in Machining-II. p. 89Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Zhang, M.L.H. Wise and D.K. Aspinwall (April, 1993) The machining of y titanium aluminides (Ti-48A1–2Mn-2Nb), Proc. 30th MTDR, UMIST, Manchester, p. 111Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Mazdiyasni (January, 1993) Barriers to applying advanced high-temperature materials. JOM, 45, p. 49Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. Neailey (February, 1988) Surface integrity of machined components — microstructural aspects. Metals and Materials, 4, p. 93Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Field, J.F. Kahles and J.T. Cammett (1972) A review of measuring methods for surface integrity, Annals of CIRP, 2, p. 219Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    W.P. Koster and M. Field (1973) The effect of machining variables on the surface and structural integrity of titanium, North American Metalworking Research conference, 2, p. 67Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P.J. Ross (1988) Taguchi techniques for quality engineering, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, p. 116Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Machining Data Handbook 3rd Ed. (1980) Metcut Research Associates Inc, Cincinnati, 2, p. 18–26Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    N. Zlatin and M. Field (1973) Procedures and precautions in machining titanium alloys, Titanium and Science and Technology, 1, p. 489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Zang
    • 1
  • M. L. H. Wise
    • 1
  • D. K. Aspinwall
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Interdisciplinary Research Centre in Materials for High Performance ApplicationsUniversity of BirminghamUK
  2. 2.School of Manufacturing & Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of BirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations