Skip to main content

Inchoate Offences

  • Chapter
Criminal Law

Part of the book series: Macmillan Law Masters ((MLM))

Abstract

What are inchoate offences? The word ‘inchoate’ indicates that these offences are in a sense incomplete. They are not concerned with the direct causing of harm to a victim, but with either encouraging or planning with others to commit crimes, or trying to commit the crime itself. Several justifications for their existence have been offered. One is to see inchoate offences as preventative measures: liability is imposed for acts which fall short of a complete offence, such as murder or theft, but which come close enough to threaten public order and the Queen’s peace. The criminal law intervenes to prevent the complete offence (usually termed the ‘substantive offence’) from being committed. Another justification relies on the moral wrongfulness of the acts. It may be for example that someone’s unsuccessful attempt to injure another only fails due to the quick response of the victim, in which case the attempt may be as morally blameworthy as a completed crime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography and Further Reading

  • Buxton: Circumstances, Consequences and Attempted Rape, [1984] Criminal Law Review, 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Criminal Law Revision Committee: 18th Report, Conspiracy to Defraud (1986, Cmnd 9873).

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff: Criminal Attempts (1997, Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan: The Criminal Attempts Act and Attempting the Impossible, [1984] Criminal Law Review, 584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan: The Principle of Legality, (1986) 136 New Law Journal, 267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horder: Varieties of Intention, Criminal Attempts and Endangerment, (1994) 14 Legal Studies, 335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith: Comment on Anderson, [1985] Criminal Law Review, 652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith: Proximity at Attempt: Lord Lanes Midway Course, [1991] Criminal Law Review, 576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams: The Problem of Reckless Attempts, [1983] Criminal Law Review, 365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams: The Lords Achieve the Logically Impossible, (1985) 135, New Law Journal, 502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams: Hijacking the Legality Principle, (1986) 136 New Law Journal, 303.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1998 Marise Cremona and Jonathan Herring

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Herring, J., Cremona, M. (1998). Inchoate Offences. In: Criminal Law. Macmillan Law Masters. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13561-5_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics