Abstract
Masaryk’s attitude toward Austria-Hungary, the empire of which Bohemia and Moravia formed a part, was a changing one and reflected mixed feelings. From the beginning of his political career he never ceased demanding political independence (samostatnost or nezávislost) for the Czech nation. This meant, in his mind, cultural, economic and social independence, or territorial autonomy within the framework of the Monarchy. In fact in the early years, and even later, he repeatedly asserted that complete political independence, i.e. separation from the Monarchy, was excluded by the smallness of the nation and its geographic location.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See also Masaryk, Palackého idea národa českého (Prague, 1947), pp. 39–40.
These include Masaryk, Karel Havlíček (Prague, 1896), chaps XIV, XVII, XVIII, pp. 460–80;
Otázka sociální (7th edn, Prague, 1948), II, chap. 8;
Rusko a evropa (Prague, 1919), I, p. 333–46;
‘Zur deutsch-böhmischen Ausgleichsfrage’, Die Zeit (Vienna), IV, 25 April 1896,
also in Czech, ‘Dohodnutí Čechů s Němci’, in Anketa Rozhledů, V, 1896, pp. 418–25;
the latter reproduced in J. B. Kozák (ed.), Masaryková práce (Prague, 1930), pp. 114–21;
‘Humanity and Nationality’, Naše doba, IV (1897), pp. 193–205, plus an editorial note also probably written by Masaryk, ibid., pp. 256–9;
published in A. von Czedik, Zur Geschichte der k. k. oesterreichischen Ministerien, 1861–1920 (Teschen, Vienna and Leipzig, 1917–1920), IV, pp. 226–34, also published in Čas, 24 December 1907;
See also Miroslav Trapl, Vědecké základy Masarykovy politiky (Brno, 1946), chaps. 5, 6, 7;
Roman Szporluk, The Political Thought of Thomas G. Masaryk (Boulder and New York, 1981), chap. V;
Roland J. Hoffmann, T. G. Masaryk und die tschechische Frage (Munich, 1988), pp. 21–2, 449–61;
František Kaufman, ‘T. G. Masaryk and the Problem of National Identity’, Kosmas, IV, 2 (Winter, 1985), pp. 71–81;
in Czech, in Masaryk a soucašnost, ed. Milan Machovec, Petr Pithart and Miloš Pojar (Prague, 1992) (originally published in samizdat, 1980), pp. 118–27;
Zdeněk Suda, ‘The Theories of Nation in the Work of T. G. Masaryk and Emanuel Rádl’, in Josef Novák, ed., On Masaryk, Texts in English and German (Amsterdam, 1988), pp. 317–32.
Masaryk, Havlíček, pp. 327, 330; Česká otázka/NNK, pp. 189, 263–4; The Development of the Modern Science of Socialism’, Nová doba (Pilsen), XII, no. 12, 12 February 1907, pp. 1–2.
partial texts in Jiří Kovtun, Slovo má poslanec Masaryk (Munich, 1985), pp. 83ff. and 111ff.
An English translation of the latter is given in George J. Kovtun, The Spirit of Thomas G Masaryk, 1850–1937: An Anthology (London, 1990), pp. 53–60.
See also Masaryk’s lecture in London in 1915, The Problem of Small Nations in the European Crisis (London, 1916).
See also Masaryk, Havlíček (2nd edn, 1904), p. 142.
See Butter, ‘Zahraniční politika T. G. Masaryka’, Zahraniční politika, 18, no. 14 (1939), pp. 124–5, 132.
Čas, 18 May 1900, cited in Evžen Štern, Názory T. G. Masaryka (Prague, 1910), p. 49.
For brief summaries of state right in Czech politics, see Skilling, ‘The Politics of the Czech Eighties’, in Skilling and Peter Brock, The Czech Renascence of the Nineteenth Century (Toronto, 1970), pp. 259–62;
Bruce M. Garver, The Young Czech Party 1874–1901 and the Emergence of a Multi-party System (New Haven, 1978), pp. 49–59, 71, passim;
See Jaroslav Houser, ‘Stáoprávní program na přelomu století’, Právně historické studie, 15 (Prague, 1971), pp. 45–62.
Karel Kramář, České státní právo (Prague, 1896);
Das böhmische Staatsrecht (Vienna, 1896), pp. 10, 20, 34 and passim.
For other expositions of state right, see Alois Rašín, České státní právo (Prague, 1891) (Progressive);
B. Pacák and J. Kaizl, O státoprávní programu české (Prague, 1896)
and Josef Herold, O státoprávní programu českém (Prague, 1896) (both Young Czech);
Józa Skalák, Přirozená práva národů (Prague, 1897) (Social Democrat);
Václav Choc, České státní právo (Olomouc, 1900) (National Socialist);
Antonín Hajn, ‘Státoprávní politika v přitomnosti i budoucnosti’, in Lad. Machác et al., Státoprávní politika (Prague, 1903) (State Right Progressive);
Antonín Hajn, Výbor prací 1889–1909, (Prague, 1913), III, pp. 49–69 (State Right Progressive);
Josef Fořt, O českém problému státoprávním (1913) (Young Czech).
Kramář, Poznámky o české politice (Prague, 1906);
Kamil Krofta, Politická postava Karla Kramáře, edited by Karel Hoch (Prague, 1936), pp. 22–3).
For their later position see Zdeněk Šolle and Alena Gajanová, Po stopě dějin, Češía Slováci v letech 1848–1938 (Prague, 1969), pp. 117–22.
Masaryk, Pravo přirozené a historické (Prague, 1900).
See also Masaryk’s criticism of the inconsistency of the Young Czechs on state and natural right in Desorganisace mladočeské strany (1903), pp. 19–30.
Edvard Beneš, Le problème autrichien et la question tchèque (Paris, 1908), p. 229;
Louis Eisenmann, Le Compromis Austro-Hongrois de 1867; Étude sur le dualisme (Paris, 1904), p. 668.
See also Josef Redlich, Öesterreichische Regierung und Verwaltung im Weltkrieg (Vienna, 1916), espec. pp. 25–30, 34–5.
For contemporary Czech constitutional analysis, see articles by Dobroslav Krejči and F. Vavrínek, in Zdeněk Tobolka, (ed.), Česká politika (Prague, 1906–1913), II, 2, pp. 1–14, 77ff, 45 Iff, 723ff.
For a more recent analysis, see Robert A. Kann, The Multinational Empire; Nationalism and National Reform in the Habsburg Monarchy, 1848–1918 (New York, 1950), 2 vols.
in Adolf Srb, Politické dějiny národa českého od počatku doby konstitučni (Prague, 1926), vol. 2, pp. 382–5;
that of 22 June 1907, Zdeněk Tobolka, Politické dějiný československého národa od r. 1848 až do dnešní doby (Prague, 1936), III, 2, pp. 488–9.
Herold, ‘Reform of the Provincial Constitution’, Česká revue (1907–8), 7, pp. 256–62, 339–45, 428–32, 468–73.
For an extended listing of provincial powers, see his lecture, Herold, Reforma zemského zřízení král. českého (Prague, 1908) pp. 15–16.
Hajn, Ku programu pokrokové strany českoslovanské (Pardubice, 1905), pp.40–59.
Among the host of books dealing with the language question, see, for a good brief summary, Robert A. Kann, The Multinational Empire, Nationalism and National Reform in the Habsburg Monarchy 1848–1918 (2 vols, New York, 1950, reprinted in 1964 and 1970) I, 191–215.
See also Heinrich Münch, Böhmische Tragödie; das Schicksal Mitteleuropas im Lichte des tschechishche Frage (Brunswick, 1949), pp. 700–26;
Trapl, Masarykův program. Demokracie-Socialismus-Českd otázka (Brno, 1948), pp. 167—77;
George J. Kovtun, ‘Thomas G. Masaryk’s Road to Revolution’, in Miloš Čapek and Karel Hrubý (eds), T. G. Masaryk in Perspective. Comments and Criticism (n.p., 1981), pp. 139–69;
Jaroslav Werstadt, Od ‘české otázky’ k ‘nové evrope’, Linie politickeho vyvoje Masaryka (Prague, 1920), pp. 19–29.
also in Hlavác, Frantisek Josef 1 (Prague, 1933), chap. 28.
Zdeněk Šolle, ‘Masaryková cesta k Nové Evropě, in Masaryk a myšlenka evropské jednoty (Prague, 1992), pp. 40–59.
long excerpts are given in Jan Herben, T. G. Masaryk (Prague, 1926), I, pp. 116–23 and Kozák (ed.), Masaryková práce, pp.80–5.
and in German by Ernst Rychnowsky, Masaryk (2nd edn, Prague, 1930).
The latter is also cited by J. Doležal, Masarykova cesta životem (2 vols, Brno, 1920–21), I, p. 51.
Masaryk, Americké přednášky (Prague, 1929), pp. 90–2.
The last sentence, from the speech of 22 February, was given in Masaryk, Rakouská zahraniční politika a diplomatic (Prague, 1911), p. 75
Masaryk, Světová revoluce (Prague, 1925), p. 40;
The Making of a State, Memories and Observations, 1914–1918 (London, 1927), pp. 46–7.
Gustav Kolmer, Parlament und Verfassung in Oesterreich (Vienna, 1908–10), Vol. 8, pp. 25–6.
Karel Pichlík, Zahraniční odboj 1914–1918 bez legend (Prague, 1968), pp. 26, 36–8.
Kamil Krofta, Politická postava Karla Kramáře (Prague, 1930), pp. 422–4.
B. Šantrůček, Masaryk a Klofáč (Prague, 1938), pp. 389–97;
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1994 H. Gordon Skilling
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Skilling, H.G. (1994). Advocate of Czech Independence. In: T. G. Masaryk. St Antony’s/Macmillan Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13392-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13392-5_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-13394-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-13392-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)