The Effectiveness of Monetary Policy in the Presence of Liquidity Constraints

  • George Hadjimatheou

Abstract

In recent years the relevance of liquidity and credit constraints in modelling consumers’ expenditure has become an important issue. It was mainly the persistent rejection of the rational expectations permanent income hypothesis by the data that brought the issue to the forefront of the relevant literature. The usual response to the negative results has been to amend the theory to allow for the presence of imperfect capital markets, while at the same time retaining its basic features. But the belated recognition that, in view of the prevalence of liquidity constraints, the implications of the pure theory are empirically untenable, has given rise to the suggestion that the often derided Keynesian consumption function may, after all, be a good approximation to the behaviour of a substantial section of consumers.

Keywords

Depression Income Arena Omic Flavin 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BERNANKE, B. S. (1985). ‘Adjustment costs, durables and aggregate consumption’, Journal of Monetary Economics (January) 41–68.Google Scholar
  2. CAMBLE, J. and TURNER, P. (1985) ‘Asymmetric Information and Credit Rationing: Another View of Industrial Bank Lending and Britain’s Economic Problem’, in D. Currie (ed.), Advances in Monetary Economics (London: Croom Helm) 207–20.Google Scholar
  3. CLOWER, R. W. (1965) ‘The Keynesian Counter Revolution: A theoretical Appraisal’, in F. Hahn and F. Breckling (eds), The Theory of Interest Rates (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  4. DISNEY, R. (1979) ‘Recurrent Spells and the Concentration of Unemployment in Great Britain’, Economic Journal (March) 109–19.Google Scholar
  5. DORNBUSH, R. (1985) Sound Currency and Full Employment (London: Employment Institute).Google Scholar
  6. DOW, J. C. R. (1970) The Management of the British Economy 945–60 (London: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  7. DUESENBERRY, J. S. (1949) Income, Saving and the Theory of Consumer Behavior (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. FLAVIN, M. (1985) ‘Excess Sensitivity of Consumption to Current Income: Liquidity Constraints or Myopia?’, Canadian Journal of Economics (February) 117–36.Google Scholar
  9. FLEMMING, J. S. (1973) ‘The Consumption Function when Capital Markets are Imperfect: The Permanent Income Hypothesis Reconsidered’, Oxford Economic Papers (July) 160–72.Google Scholar
  10. FRIEDMAN, M. (1957) A Theory of the Consumption Function (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  11. HADJIMATHEOU, G. (1987) Consumer Economics After Keynes — Theory and Evidence of the Consumption Function (Brighton: Wheatsheaf).Google Scholar
  12. HALL, R. E. and MISHKIN, F. S. (1982) ‘The sensitivity of consumption to transitory income: estimates from panel data on households’. Econometrica no. 6 (Mar.) 461–81.Google Scholar
  13. HAYASHI, F. (1985) ‘The effect of liquidity constraints on consumption: a cross-sectional analysis’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics (February) 183–206.Google Scholar
  14. HICKS, J. R. (1946) Value and Capital, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  15. KELSEY, D. (1986) ‘The Consumption Function When Capital and Labour Markets are Imperfect’, Economic Theory Discussion Paper No. 91 (Cambridge University: Department of Applied Economics).Google Scholar
  16. KEYNES, J. M. (1936) The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  17. KOSKELA, E. and VIREN, M. (1982) ‘Inflation, tight money and household saving behaviour: Finnish evidence’, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol. 84, pp. 483–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. KOWALEWSKI, K. and SMITH, G. (1979) ‘The spending behaviour of wealth and liquidity-constrained consumers’, Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper no. 536 (September).Google Scholar
  19. LEIJONHUFVUD, A. (1973) ‘Effective Demand Failures’, Swedish Economic Journal (Mar.) 27–48.Google Scholar
  20. MARIGER, R. P. (1986) Consumption Behavior and the Effects of Government Fiscal Policies (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  21. MATTHEWS, R. C. O. (1959) The Trade Cycle (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  22. MODIGLIANI, F. (1977) ‘The Monetarist Controversy or, Should we Forsake Stabilisation Policies?’, American Economic Review (Mar.) 1–19.Google Scholar
  23. MODIGLIANI, F. and BRUMBERG, R. (1954) ‘Utility Analysis and the Consumption Function: An Interpretation of Cross-section Data’, in K. Kurihara (ed.), Post-Keynesian Economics (New Brunswick, New Jersey: George Allen and Unwin).Google Scholar
  24. STIGLITZ, J. E. et al. (1989) The Economic Role of the State (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
  25. STIGLITZ, J. E. and WEISS, A. (1981) ‘Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information’, American Review (June) 393–410.Google Scholar
  26. SURVEY OF CONSUMER FINANCES (1984) Federal Reserve Bulletin, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (September).Google Scholar
  27. WEBB, D. C. (1981) The Net Wealth Effect of Government Bonds When Credit Markets are Imperfect’, Economic Journal (June) 405–14.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Philip Arestis 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • George Hadjimatheou

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations