Complementary, alternative, traditional, natural, fringe, unorthodox, quack: the therapies and techniques we discuss in this book have been called many things. Which you select reveals a great deal about your views on the subject.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- BMA 1986. Alternative Therapy. Report of the Board of Education. London: British Medical Association.Google Scholar
- BMA 1993. Complementary Medicine: new approaches to good practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Capra, F. & C. Spretnak 1984. Green Politics. New York: E. P. Dutton.Google Scholar
- Coward, R. 1989. The Whole Truth: the myth of alternative medicine. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
- Doyle, C. 1993. Reaching out for an alternative. The Daily Telegraph, 6 April.Google Scholar
- Fulder, S. J. & R. Munro 1981. The Status of Complementary Medicine in the United Kingdom. London: The Threshold Foundation.Google Scholar
- Hooper, Baroness 1990. Medicine: complementary and conventional treatments. Hansard (9 May), 518: 82. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
- Inglis, B. 1979. Natural Medicine. Glasgow: Fontana.Google Scholar
- Inglis, B. 1993. Will alternative ever become mainstream? The Daily Telegraph, 5 January.Google Scholar
- Lewith, G. & D. Aldridge 1991. Complementary Medicine and the European Community. Saffron Waiden: C. W. Daniel.Google Scholar
- NAHAT 1993. Complementary Therapies in the NHS (Research Paper No. 10). London: National Association of Health Authorities and Trusts.Google Scholar
- Sykes, J. B. (ed.) 1983. The Concise Oxford Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- West, R. 1992. Alternative medicine: prospects and speculations. In Saks, M. (ed.): Alternative Medicine in Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar