Skip to main content
Book cover

Legal Method pp 116–130Cite as

Ratio Decidendi and Obiter Dictum

  • Chapter
  • 99 Accesses

Part of the book series: Macmillan Professional Masters ((PAPRMA))

Abstract

Although the doctrine of binding precedent states that all courts bind all lower courts and some courts also bind themselves, it would be wrong to conclude that everything contained in a decision is of equal weight. The traditional view is that we have to differentiate between the ratio decidendi of a judgement, which will be the binding part, and the obiter dicta, which will be the non-binding part. In order to make sense of this statement we must not only analyse what we mean by ratio decidendi and obiter dictum (which is the singular of obiter dicta), but must also consider more precisely what we mean in the present context by bindingness. Before doing so, however, we must identify a trap in order to avoid falling into it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1993 Thomas Ian McLeod

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McLeod, I. (1993). Ratio Decidendi and Obiter Dictum. In: Legal Method. Macmillan Professional Masters. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13153-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13153-2_10

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-58872-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-13153-2

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics