Abstract
Although the doctrine of binding precedent states that all courts bind all lower courts and some courts also bind themselves, it would be wrong to conclude that everything contained in a decision is of equal weight. The traditional view is that we have to differentiate between the ratio decidendi of a judgement, which will be the binding part, and the obiter dicta, which will be the non-binding part. In order to make sense of this statement we must not only analyse what we mean by ratio decidendi and obiter dictum (which is the singular of obiter dicta), but must also consider more precisely what we mean in the present context by bindingness. Before doing so, however, we must identify a trap in order to avoid falling into it.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1993 Thomas Ian McLeod
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McLeod, I. (1993). Ratio Decidendi and Obiter Dictum. In: Legal Method. Macmillan Professional Masters. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13153-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13153-2_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-58872-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-13153-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)