The Architectonics of Léon Walras

  • Robert E. Kuenne

Abstract

In that fascinating area of surmise designated ‘the sociology of knowledge’ must lie answers to more than one seeming conundrum in the dynamics of economic doctrine. One day, perhaps, we shall know how a perspicacious Ricardo could have framed a theory whose pessimism derived from the neglect of a revolution in technology so thorough-going as to be unique in the history of man. And perhaps it will explain that perverse principle of insularity which so often militates against the spread of economic ideas between the Continent, Great Britain and the United States.

Keywords

Income Rium Defend Clarification Omic 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Alchian, A., ‘The Meaning of Utility Measurement’, American Economic Review, 43 (1953), pp. 26–50.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Friedman, M. and L. Savage, ‘The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk’, Journal of Political Economy, 56 (1948), pp. 279–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Friedman, M. and L. Savage, ‘The Expected Utility Hypothesis and the Measurement of Utility’, Journal of Political Economy, 60 (1952), pp. 463–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Hicks, J., ‘Marginal Productivity and the Principle of Variation’, Economica, 12 (1932), pp. 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Hicks, J., Theory of Wages, St. Martin’s Press, New York (1966).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Hicks, J., ‘Léon Walras’, Econometrica, 2 (1934), pp. 345–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Hicks, J. , ‘A Suggestion for Simplifying the Theory of Money’, Economica (NS), 2 (1935), pp. 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Hicks, J., Value and Capital, Oxford University Press, London, 2nd edn (1946).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Leontief, W., The Structure of American Economy, 1919–1939, Oxford University Press, New York (1953).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Marget, A., ‘Léon Walras and the “Cash-Balance” Approach to the Problem of the Value of Money’, Journal of Political Economy, 39 (1931), pp. 569–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Marget, A., ‘The Monetary Aspects of the Walrasian System’, Journal of Political Economy, 43 (1935), pp. 145–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Marschak, J., ‘Rational Behavior, Uncertain Prospects, and Measurable Utility’, Econometrica, 18 (1950), pp. 111–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Patinkin, D., ‘A Reconsideration of the General Equilibrium Theory of Money’, Review of Economic Studies, 18 (1950–1), pp. 42–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Robertson, D., ‘Wage Grumbles’, reprinted in W. Fellner and B. F. Haley (eds), Readings in the Theory of Income Distribution, Blakiston, Philadelphia (1946).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Samuelson, P., Foundations of Economic Analysis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. (1947).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Schumpeter, J., ‘Preface to the Japanese edition of The Theory of Economic Development’, reprinted in R. Clemence (ed.), Essays of J A. Schumneter, Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, Mass. (1951).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Simkin, C.G.F., ‘Aggregate Production Functions’, Economic Record, 31 (1955). on. 32–9.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Stigler, G., Production and Distribution Theories, Macmillan, New York (1941).Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    von Neumann, J. and O. Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press, 2nd edn (1947).Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Walras, Léon, Elements of Pure Economics, Allen & Unwin, London (1954).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Robert E. Kuenne 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert E. Kuenne
    • 1
  1. 1.Princeton UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations