South Africa as a Regional Great Power

  • Samuel M. Makinda

Abstract

South Africa is the wealthiest, most populous and militarily the strongest state in southern Africa. There is no clinical definition of the southern Africa region, but it generally consists of 10 countries: South Africa and its former colony, Namibia; former Portuguese colonies of Angola and Mozambique; former British High Commission territories of Botswana, Lesotho and Swaziland; and former Central African Federation members, Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe. The region is basically a geographic unit, but it also contains states which have historically maintained a network of commercial, political or communications links with South Africa. Tanzania, as one of the Frontline states, may be thought to be a southern African state, but in my view, it does not fit in the region either geographically or historically. With a population of about 37 million, South Africa accounts for about 40 per cent of the region’s total population. It has about 26 million blacks, six million whites, four million ‘coloureds’ and one million Asians. In spite of international economic sanctions, and a severe recession in 1991, South Africa’s economy has remained buoyant in comparison with those of neighbouring states, with the exception of perhaps Botswana and Zimbabwe.1 With a GDP in 1989 of more than US$ 90 billion, South Africa accounted for more than 80 per cent of the GDP of the 10 countries of the region taken together. It has a strong industrial base and is self-sufficient in most goods. It does not have oil reserves, but has the technology to convert coal into oil.

Keywords

Europe Platinum Manganese Transportation Uranium 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    J. P. Hayes, Economic Effects of Sanctions on Southern Africa (London: Gower, 1987).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kenneth W. Grundy, The Militarisation of South African Politics (2nd edn; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    The apartheid system has been analysed in numerous studies. See, for instance, Robert W. Peterson (ed.) South Africa and Apartheid (New York, NY: Facts on File, 1971):Google Scholar
  4. 3a.
    T. D. Moody, The Rise of Afrikanerdom (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1975).Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    E. N. Tjønneland, Pax Pretoriana: The Fall of Apartheid and the Politics of Regional Destabilisation (Uppsala: Scandinavian Institute of African Studies, 1989), p. 7.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    For a good analysis of South Africa’s relations with its neighbours, see Robert S. Jaster, South Africa and its Neighbours: the Dynamics of Regional Conflict, Adelphi Papers No. 209 (London: International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1986);Google Scholar
  7. 6a.
    Joseph Hanlon, Beggar Your Neighbours: Apartheid Power in Southern Africa (London: James Currey, 1986).Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    Namibia was colonised by Germany in the 1880s. Following the German defeat in the First World War, the territory was transfered to South Africa under a League of Nations mandate in 1920. After the Second World War, South Africa refused to turn over its defunct League mandate to the League’s successor, the United Nations, and instead proposed to incorporate Namibia. That was the beginning of the long struggle between South Africa and the UN over Namibia, which ended only in 1990. In 1966, the UN General Assembly declared Pretoria’s mandate over Namibia ended and established the UN Council for Namibia as an alternative government to run the territory in absentia. The UN Security Council in 1970 declared South Africa’s occupation of Namibia illegal, because its application of apartheid to the territory violated the terms of its mandate. In 1978, the UN Security Council passed the now famous resolution 435 setting forth procedures for Namibia’s independence. See, for instance, David Soggot, Namibia: The Violent Heritage (New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press, 1986).Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    A statement by a certain Giliomee, cited in Stanley Uys, ‘Whither the White Oligargy?’, in Jesmond Blumenfeld (ed.), South Africa in Crisis (London: Croom Helm, 1987), pp. 56–76.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    For a concise analysis of P. W. Botha’s legacy to South Africa, see Brian Pottinger, ‘The Botha Era: An End or Beginning?’, CSIS Africa Notes, No. 104. (Washington, DC: Center for Strategic International Studies, African Studies Program), 30 October 1989.Google Scholar
  11. 15.
    See, for instance, Kenneth W. Grundy, ‘Pax Pretoriana: South Africa’s Regional Policy’, Current History LXXXIV (1985): 150–4.Google Scholar
  12. 16.
    See Robert S. Jaster, The 1988 Peace Accords and the Future of Souith-western Africa, Adelphi Papers No. 253 (London: International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1990), pp. 17–23.Google Scholar
  13. 18.
    For a concise discussion of this problem, see John de St. Jorre, ‘Destabilization and Dialogue: South Africa’s Emergence as a Regional Superpower’, CSIS Africa Notes, No. 26, 17 April 1984.Google Scholar
  14. 19.
    There is a lot of literature on the Angolan civil war in 1975–76. See, for instance, John A. Marcum, The Angolan Revolution, Vol. 2: Exile Politics and Guerrilla Warfare (1962–1976) (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1978). See also the informative account of the disillusioned head of the CIA Angola Task Force,Google Scholar
  15. 19a.
    John Stockwell, In Search of Enemies: A CIA Story (London: Andre Deutsch, 1978).Google Scholar
  16. 20.
    For a very good discussion of these issues, see Raymond L. Garthoff, Detente and Confrontation: American-Soviet Relations From Nixon to Reagan (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1985), Chapter 15.Google Scholar
  17. 21.
    For a useful analysis of the Reagan Administration’s policy towards Angola, see Michael McFaul, ‘Rethinking the “Reagan Doctrine” in Angola’, International Security, XIV (1989–90): 135.Google Scholar
  18. 22.
    For a useful discussion of some of these issues, see Sam C. Nolutshungu, ‘Namibian Independence and Soviet-US Cooperation’ in Anatoly A. Gromyko and C. S. Whitaker (eds), Agenda for Action: African-Soviet-US Cooperation (London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1990), pp. 243–50.Google Scholar
  19. 25.
    See Chris Pycroft, ‘Changes in White South Africa’, in Ben Turok (ed.), Witness From the Frontline: Aggression and Resistance in Southern Africa (London: Institute for African Alternatives, 1990), pp. 95–8.Google Scholar
  20. 27.
    For an account of Zimbabwe’s move to independence, see Henry Wiseman and Alastair M. Taylor, From Rhodesia to Zimbabwe: The Politics of Transition (New York, NY: Pergamon, 1981).Google Scholar
  21. 29.
    See, for instance, Gillian Gunn, ‘Post-Nkomati Mozambique’, CSIS Africa Notes, No. 38, 8 January 1985.Google Scholar
  22. 30.
    For an example of the Commonwealth’s criticism of South Africa, see the findings of the Commonwealth Eminent Persons Group on Southern Africa, Mission to South Africa: The Commonwealth Report (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1986).Google Scholar
  23. 31.
    As an example, the Non-Aligned Movement’s sixth conference in Havana in 1979 condemned South Africa’s aggression against neighbouring states and the actions of Western powers which buttressed apartheid through their economic involvement in the country. See Peter Willetts, The Non-Aligned in Havana (London: Frances Pinter, 1981), pp. 87–97.Google Scholar
  24. 32.
    See Robert S. Jasper, ‘Pretoria’s Nuclear Diplomacy’, CSIS Africa Notes, No. 88, 22 January 1988.Google Scholar
  25. 33.
    Zbigniew Brzezinski, Power and Principle: Memoirs of the National Security Adviser 1977–1981 (New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 1983), pp. 139–40. For Vance’s views on the issue, seeGoogle Scholar
  26. 33a.
    Cyrus Vance, Hard Choices: Critical Years in America’s Foreign Policy (New York, NY: Simon and Schuster, 1983), pp. 256–313.Google Scholar
  27. 35.
    See Kurt Campbell, ‘Soviet Policy in Southern Africa: Angola and Mozambique’ in Kurt M. Campbell and S. Neil MacFarlane (eds), Gorbachev’s Third World Dilemmas (London: Routledge, 1989) Chapter 8.Google Scholar
  28. 36.
    For some analysis of the politics of the OAU, see, for instance, Zdenek Cervenka, The Unfinished Quest for Unity: Africa and the OAU (London: Africa Books, 1977); andGoogle Scholar
  29. 36a.
    Olajide Aluko, ‘The OAU and Human Rights’, Round Table, No. 283 (July 1981), pp. 234–42Google Scholar
  30. 37.
    See O. Agyeman, ‘The Osagyefo, the Mwalimu and Pan-Africanism: A study in the growth of a dynamic concept’, Journal of Modern African Studies XIII (1975): 653–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel M. Makinda

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations