Advances in CAD-CAM Integration

  • C. Marty
  • M. Chaabane
  • B. Roumesy


For many years now, customers have bought CAD/CAM systems with purchase based primarily upon individual applications functionality. More recently, the common technical purchasing criteria were extended to encompass inter-applications communication around a product data-base with a purely geometric representation of parts. The increasing force of international competition involves the simultaneous contribution of all engineering functions in order to minimize product development times and associated costs. With feature-based modellers, it is possible to use K.B.S. tools to automate long and tedious tasks along the production cycle. A geometrical codification widened to the process and to the execution times estsblishes the link between CAD, CAPP, CAM and production management.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J. PATON, Ferranti Infographics internal report, March 1990, Livingston, SctotlandGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. CHAABANE and C. MARTY, benefits of parametric approach in integrated CAD/CAM system, 23rd CIRP international seminar on manufacturing systems, June 6–7, 1991 in Nancy, FranceGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C.H. LINK, CAPP-CAM-I Automated process planning systems, Proceedings of the 13th Numerical Control annual meeting and tedchnical conference, Cincinnati, 1976Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D.K. ALLEN, Computer aided process planning OPCODES and work elements for machined parts, final report for CAM-I, Arlington 1978Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    TNO, Introduction to MIPLAN, Organization for industrial research, Waltham, 1981Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    I. HAM, S.C-Y LU and et al., Computer aided process planning: present and future, CIRP keynote paper, Annals of CIRP, vol. 2, 1988Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P.L. BRODIER, Associer développement et pnoductivité, Politique industrielle, Eté 1989Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. MARTY, Suggestions for accurate economic indicators, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing (U.K.), to be published.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. MARTY, Le mieux produire, Lavoisier Publi. 1991 FranceGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. BESSON, L’atelier de demain. Perspectives de l’automatisation flexible, Presses universitaires de Lyon, 1983 FranceGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R.A. LINDBERG, Processes and materials of manufacture, Allyn and Bacon Publi. 1990Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Y. NADIR, M. CHAABANE and C. MARTY, Automated coding system in group technology for rotational parts PROCODE, 8th International Conference on CARS/FOF, August 17–19, 1992 in Metz, FranceGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Marty
    • 1
  • M. Chaabane
    • 1
  • B. Roumesy
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute of Applied ScienceLaboratoire d’Etudes des Procédés de FabricationFrance

Personalised recommendations