Skip to main content

The Selection of Surfaces in Inspection Planning for Coordinate Measuring Machines

  • Chapter
Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Matador Conference

Summary

If probe paths for coordinate measuring machines are to be generated automatically then methods must be developed that can determine which surfaces need to be inspected. Evolving computer based systems supporting engineering design and manufacture are adopting the concept of a Product Model as the central source for the data required by the various activities in the design and production cycle. This paper outlines a product model capable of representing data relating to a component’s geometry, dimensions, specification and manufacturing processes. An inspection planning application then uses the product model to determine which surfaces need to be inspected to ensure that the product conforms to the product specification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A J Spyridi and A A G Requicha, (1989) “Accessibility Analysis for the Automatic Inspection of Mechanical Parts by Coordinate Measuring Machines”, Technical report, University of Southern California, Computer Science Department and Institute for Robotics and Intelligent Systems, SAL 202-MC 0782, IRIS#257.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M J Corrigall, (1990) “Inspection Plan and Code Generation for Coordinate Measuring Machines in a Product Modelling Environment”, PhD thesis, Loughborough University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  3. T C Chang, D C Anderson, and O R Mitchell, (1988) “QTC-An Integrated Design/Manufacturing /Inspection System for Prismatic Parts”, In Proceedings of the 1988 ASME International Computers in Engineering Conference, p 417–426.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R Singh, E Sittas, G Mullineux, and A J Medland, (1990) “Intelligent Communications between CAD and Manufacturing Activities”, In Proceedings of the 28th MATADOR Conference, p 305–312.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H A Elmaraghy and P H Gu, (1987) “Expert System for Inspection Planning”, Annals of the CIRP, 36/1, p 85–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. C W Brown and D A Gyorog, (1990) “Generative Inspection Process Planner for Integrated Production”, In P H Cohen and S B Joshi, editors, Advances in Integrated Product Design and Manufacturing, p 151–162, ASME.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Machine Data Center, (1980) “Machining Data Handbook”, 3rd Edition, Volume 2, p 18–11–18–13, Metcut Research Associates Inc., 3980 Rosslyn Drive, Cincinnati, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  8. John S Oakland, (1986) “Statistical Process Control”, Heinemann Professional Publishing, Oxford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  9. I Sutherland, (1963) “Sketchpad-A Man-Machine Graphical Interface”, PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  10. STEP DP10303, (1988) “Standard for the Exchange of Product Model Data”, ISO TC184/SC4/WG1.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A Saia, N Juster, and A de Pennington, (1990) “A Geometry Modelling System: Beyond Solid Modelling”, In J U Turner M J Wozny and K Preiss, editors, Geometric Modelling for Product Engineering, p 71–84, IFIP, Elservier Science Publishers B.V., North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L P Wickens and A McKay, (1991) “Product Data Model: pms3_9.lam”, Technical report, University of Leeds and Loughborough University of Technology, ISS Project, Miscellaneous Document, iss-misc-21.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vijay A Tipnis, (1989) “Research Opportunities in Mechanical Tolerancing”, Results of an International Workshop sponsored by the National Science Foundation, held in Orlando FL., September 28-October 2.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L P Wickens, (1990) “A Syntax for Dimensions and Tolerances”, PhD thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A McKay and D Holdworth, (1987) “The Structure Editor”, Technical report, University of Leeds and Loughborough University of Technology, Geometric Modelling Project User Manual USER-12.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A McKay, P Bell, and B Young, (1990) “The Description of Planned Processes”, Technical report, University of Leeds and Loughborough University of Technology, iss-msg-report-20.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R I M Young, (1991) “Machine Planning in a Product Model Environment”, PhD thesis, Loughborough University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  18. F M Hashim, N P Juster, and A de Pennington, (1991) “The Representation of Mechanical Functions in Computer Aided Design Systems”, Submitted to the 29th MATADOR Conference, UMIST, Manchester, 6th–7th April 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1992 Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hsu, J.L.H., Juster, N.P., De Pennington, A. (1992). The Selection of Surfaces in Inspection Planning for Coordinate Measuring Machines. In: Atkinson, J., Barrow, G., Burdekin, M., Chitkara, N.R., Hannam, R.G. (eds) Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Matador Conference. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12433-6_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12433-6_41

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-12435-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-12433-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics