Conclusion: The Presidency and Political Change
Daniel Cosío Villegas characterised the Mexican presidency as ‘an absolute monarch for six years’.1 There is an obvious sense in which this statement is true; there is virtually no constitutional check on the power of the Mexican president.2 We have seen that each of the last four presidents of Mexico carried out a number of wholly arbitrary acts (fewer perhaps in the case of de la Madrid) for which they did not in the least expect to be held personally responsible.
KeywordsEurope Turkey Expense Bark Argentina
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Do Cosío Villegas, La Sucesión Presidencial en Mexico (Joaquin Mortiz, 1975) p.19.Google Scholar
- 2.J. Carpizo, El Poder Presidencial (Siglo XXI, 1978).Google Scholar
- 4.I. Bizberg, ‘La Crisis del Corporativismo Mexicano’ ( Mimeo, Mexico, 1989 ).Google Scholar
- 6.F. Krause, For Una Democracia Sin Adjectivos (Joaquin Mortiz, 1986), and H. Aguilar Camin, Despues del Milagro (Cal y Arena, 1988 ).Google Scholar
- 8.Michael Mann, Sources of Social Power (Cambridge University Press, 1987) vol. 1.Google Scholar
- 11.G.R. Newall and G. Rubio, Mexico’s Dilemma: The Political Origins of the Economic Crisis (Westview, 1984).Google Scholar
- 12.G. Zaid, La Economía Presidencial (Vuelta, 1987).Google Scholar
- 13.R. Camp, Intellectuals and the State in Twentieth Century Mexico (University of Texas, 1985).Google Scholar
- 14.S. Sanderson, Agrarian Populism and the Mexican State (University of California, 1981) p.142.Google Scholar
- 15.M. Needler, Mexican Politics: the Containment of Conflict (Praeger, 1982).Google Scholar