Applied Sociology in the Contemporary British Context

  • Janet Finch
Part of the Explorations in Sociology. British Sociological Association conference volume series book series (EIS)

Abstract

No one could doubt that, during the 1960s and 70s, British sociology went through a process of transformation, in which theoretical work came to have a pre-eminent place and those who practised it became the elite of the discipline. As part of this process, research defined as applied or policy-orientated was split off and allocated to the discipline of social administration, which was regarded as rather inferior, precisely because it did not privilege theoretical work. All of this is well known (see Bulmer, Chapter 2 of this volume).

Keywords

Defend Fami 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrams, P. (1982) Historical Sociology (London: Open Books).Google Scholar
  2. Abrams, P. (1985) The uses of British sociology 1931–81, in M. Bulmer (ed.) Essays on the History of British Sociological Research (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  3. Bulmer, M. (1978) The prospects for applied sociology, British Journal of Sociology 29, 128–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bulmer, M. (1982) The Uses of Social Research (London: Allen amp; Unwin).Google Scholar
  5. Finch, J. (1984) ‘It’s great to have someone to talk to’: the ethics and politics of interviewing women, in C. Bell and H. Roberts (eds) Social Researching: Politics, Problems, Practice (London: Routledge amp; Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
  6. Finch, J. (1985) Social policy and education: problems and possibilities of using qualitative research, in R.G. Burgess (ed.) Issues in Educational Research: Qualitative Methods (Lewes: Falmer Press).Google Scholar
  7. Finch, J. (1986) Research and Policy: The Uses of Qualitative Methods in Social and Educational Research. (Lewes: Falmer Press).Google Scholar
  8. Finch, J. (1989) Family Obligations and Social Change. (Cambridge: Polity Press).Google Scholar
  9. Husbands, C.T. (1981) The anti-quantitative bias in post-war British sociology, in P. Abrams, R. Deem, J. Finch and P. Rock (eds) Practice and Progress; British Sociology 1950–1980 (London: Allen amp; Unwin).Google Scholar
  10. Janowitz, M. (1972) Sociological Models and Social Policy. (Morristown, NJ: General Learning Systems).Google Scholar
  11. Jenkins, R. (1987) Doing research into discrimination: problems of methods, interpretation and ethics, in C.G. Wenger (ed.) The Research Relationship: Practice and Politics in Social Policy Research (London: Unwin Hyman).Google Scholar
  12. Johnson, R. (1976) Notes on the Schooling of the English Working Class 1780–1850, in R. Dale, G. Esland and M. MacDonald (eds) Schooling and Capitalism (London: Routledge amp; Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
  13. McDermott, K. (1987) In and out of the game: a case study of contract research, in C.G. Wenger (ed.) The Research Relationship: Practice and Politics in Social Policy Research (London: Unwin Hyman).Google Scholar
  14. Pahl, J. (1989) Money and Marriage (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  15. Pahl, R. (1984) Divisions of Labour (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
  16. Platt, J. (1986a) Functionalism and the survey: the relation of theory and method, Sociological Review 34, (3) 501–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Platt, J. (1986b) Qualitative research for the state, Quarterly Journal of Social Affairs 2 (2) 87–108.Google Scholar
  18. Platt, J. (1987) Research dissemination: a case study, Quarterly Journal of Social Affairs 3, (3) 181–98.Google Scholar
  19. Rose, H. (1981) Re-reading Titmuss: the sexual division of welfare, Journal of Social Policy 10 (4) 521–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rothschild, Lord (1971) A Framework for Government Research and Development, Cmnd 4814 (London: HMSO).Google Scholar
  21. Rothschild, Lord (1982) An Enquiry into the Social Science Research Council, Cmnd. 8554 (London: HMSO).Google Scholar
  22. Simons, H. (ed.) (1980) Towards a Science of the Singular (Norwich: University of East Anglia).Google Scholar
  23. Wenger, C.G. (1987) Introduction: the problematic relationship, in C.G. Wenger (ed.) The Research Relationship: Practice and Politics in Social Policy Research (London: Unwin Hyman).Google Scholar
  24. Yin, R. (1989) Case Study, Research: Design and Methods (Beverley Hills: Sage).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© British Sociological Association 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janet Finch

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations