Abstract
As it became clear at a relatively late stage that satellites would be attempted by more than one country during the IGY, the question emerged of what arrangements would be needed for international cooperation. The IGY’s ‘rules’ for satellites were frequently referred to after the sputniks, but their nature and status remain elusive to this day, partly because in some important respects they were never finally agreed between the two main parties, the Soviet Union and the United States, and partly because few Western authors have discussed them objectively. Historical perceptions have been strongly coloured by the extent to which national interests became involved in this part of the IGY, due amongst other things to the security issues associated with rocket launch vehicles when both superpowers were striving to develop the ICBM and to the high stakes that were being played for in the satellite projects, both in national prestige and in career prospects for the scientists and other professional people concerned.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
US Congress, House, Armed Services, Hearings: Investigation of National Defense Missiles (1958 — ch. 3, n. 57 ), p. 4304.
F. J. Krieger, Behind the Sputniks (1958 — ch. 7, n. 39), pp. 330, 114.
P. J. Klass, Secret Sentries in Space ( New York: Random House, 1971 ), pp. 30–1
M. R. Beschloss, May-Day (1986 — ch. 5, n. 9 ), p. 155
P. Pringle and W. Arkin, SLOP: Nuclear War from the Inside ( London: Sphere Books, 1983 ), pp. 51–2.
Annals, vol. VI, L. V. Berkner (ed. ), Manual on Rockets and Satellites (1958), pp. 465, 468, 470.
H. S. W. Massey and M. O. Robins, History of British Space Science ( Cambridge: Cambridge U. Press, 1986 ), p. 43
I. Southall, Woomera ( London: Angus and Robertson, 1962 ), pp. 214–15.
Tadeo Takenounchi of Tokyo University subsequently tried to calculate the exact launching times and launch site of the first two sputniks from their orbital coordinates. The first official Soviet statement on the geographical coordinates of the Baikonur Cosmodrome (Tyuratam) was issued in May 1961: K. W. Gatland, Astronautics in the Sixties (1962 — ch$11, n. 1), p. 139.
US Congress, Senate, Space Sciences, Hearings: NASA Authorization for Fiscal Year 1960 pt 1(86th Congress, 1st Session, 1959 ), pp. 661–4; H. L. Richter, W. F. Sampson and R. Stevens, ‘Microlock: a Minimum Weight Radio Instrumentation System for a Satellite’ in M. Alperin and M. Stem (eds) Vistas in Astronautics, Proc. First Annual Air Force Office of Scientific Research Astronautics Symposium, San Diego, February 1957, ( New York: Pergamon, 1958 )
W. H. Pickering with J. H. Wilson, ‘Countdown to Space Exploration: a Memoir of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory’ in R. C. Hall (ed. ) History of Rocketry and Astronautics (1977 — ch. 3, n. 51). Both tracking systems were radio interferometers, but Minitrack, which rapidly developed into NASA’s primary tracking and telemetry system, was significantly more accurate than Microlock, with a peak accuracy of 20–30 sec of arc by comparison with 3 to 4 min of arc: Annals, vol. VI (1958) pp. 279, 351, 409, 411.
Circular on US satellite programme from IGY Secretary General (Nicolet), 6 August 1956 (ICSU Archives, CN-CIR-15–568/6), p. 5; see also F. I. Ordway, ‘The U. S. Satellite Vehicle Program’, Astronautica Acta, vol. 2, no. 3, 1956.
W. Sullivan, Assault on the Unknown (1962 — ch. 7, n. 4), pp. 60–2.
RAND Corporation, H. Kallmann-Bijl and W. W. Kellogg, Scientific Use of an Artificial Earth Satellite ( Santa Monica: RAND, 1955 ), P. 5.
From remarks made in Moscow by ICIC member Kirill Stanyukovitch on 5 October 1957: K. W. Gatland (ed. ), Project Satellite (London: Allan Wingate, 1958), p. 102. Blagonravov also stated that Sputnik 1 was not an IGY satellite: New York Times, 7 October 1957.
US Congress, House, Astronautics, Space Exploration (n. 12), pp. 824, 70. S. N. Vemov, P. V. Vakulov, E. V. Gorchakov, Yu. I. Logachev and A. Ye. Chudakov, ‘Study of Soft Component of Cosmic Rays beyond the Limits of the Atmosphere’, Annals, vol. XII pt II (1961), p. 667.
J. W. Dungey, ‘The Radiation Belts’ in D. R. Bates, The Planet Earth 2nd edn ( Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1964 ), p. 311.
S. N. Vemov, N. L. Grigorov, Yu. I. Logachev and A. Ye. Chudakov, ‘Measurement of cosmic radiation by rockets and artificial earth satellites’, Annals, vol. XII pt II (1961), p. 652.
For examples of contemporary authors and later historians taking this line see: A. Marshack, The World in Space (1958 — ch. 7, n. 41 ), p. 160
J. M. Gavin, War and Peace in the Space Age (1959 — ch. 1, n. 34 ), p. 222
J. T. Wilson, IGY: the Year of the New Moons ( London: Michael Joseph, 1961 ), p. 80
E. N. Hayes, Trackers of the Skies (Cambridge, MA: Howard Doyle, 1968), p. 51; Green and Lomask, Vanguard (n. 10 ), p. 185.
H. Brooks, ‘The Scientific Adviser’ in R. M. Gilpin and C. Wright (eds), Scientists and National Policy-Making ( New York: Columbia U. Press, 1964 ), pp. 76–7.
Copyright information
© 1991 Rip Bulkeley
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bulkeley, R. (1991). Satellites in the IGY. In: The Sputniks Crisis and Early United States Space Policy. Studies in Military and Strategic History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11981-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11981-3_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-11983-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-11981-3
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)