Skip to main content

Judicial Activism in Canada

  • Chapter

Abstract

The judiciary played an important but largely invisible role in the Canadian political system for over a century. From the founding of the country in 1867 to the ‘patriation’ of the constitution and adoption of an entrenched Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1982, Canadian judicial behavior reflected the conservatism of its English role model. Judicial restraint was a dominant feature of court work, with only a few notable exceptions that had no lasting impact on how the judiciary saw itself or saw the world around it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See among others Michael Mandel, The Charter of Rights and the Legalization of Politics in Canada (Toronto: Wall and Thomson, 1989) Socialist Studies 2 (1984), theme issue on ‘Critical Perspectives on the Constitution’;

    Google Scholar 

  2. David Frum, ‘Who’s Running This Country, Anyway?’ Saturday Night 103 (October 1988): 56.

    Google Scholar 

  3. For two useful assessments of the Charter in light of these arguments, see Peter H. Russell, ‘The First Three Years in Charterland,’ Canadian Public Administration 28 (Fall 1985): 367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ian Greene, The Charter of Rights (Toronto: James Lorimer, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  5. The best comprehensive analysis is Peter H. Russell, The Judiciary in Canada: The Third Branch of Government (Toronto McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 1987), Ch. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alan C. Caims, ‘The Judicial Committee and its Critics,’ Canadian Journal of Political Science 3 (1971): 301.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carl Baar, ‘Judicial Behavior and Comparative Rights Policy,’ in Richard Claude (ed.), Comparative Human Rights (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976), Ch. 14 at p. 362.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See Carl Baar, ‘Patterns and Strategies of Court Administration in Canada and the United States,’ Canadian Public Administration 20 (1977): 242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jules Deschenes, Masters in Their Own House (Ottawa: Canadian Judicial Council, 1981), pp. 97–9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See for example Robert Martin, ‘The Judges and the Charter,’ Socialist Studies 2 (1984) 66;

    Google Scholar 

  11. Andrew Petter, ‘Immaculate Deception: The Charter’s Hidden Agenda,’ Socialist Studies 2 (1984): 66; The Advocate 45 (1987): 857

    Google Scholar 

  12. Harry J. Glasbeek, ‘A No-Frills Look at the Charter of Rights and Freedoms or How Politicians and Lawyers Hide Reality,’ Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 9 (1989): 293.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See Lorraine Weinrib, ‘The Supreme Court of Canada and Section One of the Charter,’ Supreme Court Law Review 10 (1988): 469. The key case on section one is The Queen v. Oakes (1986) 1 S.C.R. 103.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Royal Commission on the Donald Marshall, Jr., Prosecution, Volume 1: Findings and Recommendations (Halifax, Nova Scotia, December 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bertha Wilson, ‘Decision-Making in the Supreme Court,’ University of Toronto Law Journal 36 (1986): 227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bertha Wilson, ‘Courts Need Women’s Perspective Madame Justice Wilson Says,’ Canadian Human Rights Advocate 6 (Feb. 1990): 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See for example: Martha Jackman, ‘The Protection of Welfare Rights Under the Charter,’ Ottawa Law Review 20 (1988): 257; and three papers prepared for the panel on ‘Positive Rights, Participation and the Charter’ at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Law and Society Association, Victoria, British Columbia, 30 May 1990: Martha Jackman, ‘The Right to Participate in Regulatory Decisions Affecting Charter Protected Interests’; Kent Roach, ‘Remedial Implications of Positive Rights’; and Patrick Macklem, ‘Comment: The Limits and Possibilities of Judicial Review.’

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1991 Kenneth M. Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baar, C. (1991). Judicial Activism in Canada. In: Holland, K.M. (eds) Judicial Activism in Comparative Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11774-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics