Advertisement

Judicial Activism in Sweden

  • Joseph B. Board

Abstract

What follows is less a description of judicial activism in Sweden than an attempt to explain its absence. The picture is further complicated by the presence, in Sweden, of an institutional capability for judicial activism, but, despite periodic demands from various groups for a vigorous exercise of judicial review, the capability has remained largely untapped. For a variety of reasons, judges in Sweden have been looked upon more as administrators than as legislators — rule-enforcers rather than rule-makers — and there is a deeply laid fear of judicial involvement on the wrong side of that elusive line which separates political from legal matters. The political implications of a recent New York Times headline, ‘Judges Void New York City Government,’ would, even after due allowance was made for headline-writers’ hyperbole, have sent a frisson down the collective back of the Swedish body politic.1 Even if the Swedish practice is one of inactivism, it is nevertheless useful to examine it in some detail for what the absence itself tells us about judicial activism’s failure to take root in what would in many respects appear to be fertile soil.

Keywords

Comparative Perspective Judicial Review Legal Culture Judicial Activism Constitutional Reform 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Glendon Schubert, Judicial Policy Making: The Political Role of the Courts, rev. edn (Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, 1974), p. 213.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Herbert Jacob, Justice in America: Courts, Lawyers, and the Judicial Process, 4th edn (Boston: Little, Brown, 1984), pp. 25–46. Actually both roles may involve judicial policy-making.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    For the German approach to this question, see the description of the General Part of the Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (B.G.B.), or Civil Code, in John Henry Merryman, The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Western Europe and Latin America, 2nd edn (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1985), pp. 68–79.Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    See Stig Strômholm, An Introduction to Swedish Law (Stockholm: Norstedts, 1981), pp. 32–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. For a survey of the literature on this taxonomic question, see Rudolf B. Schlesinger, Hans W. Baade, Mirjan R. Damaska, and Peter E. Herzog, Comparative Law: Cases — Texts — Materials, 5th edn (Mineola, NY: The Foundation Press, 1988), p. 327.Google Scholar
  6. 9.
    For an enumeration of the various reports issued by this commission, see Erik Holmberg and Nils Stjemquist, Var forfattning: Sjunde upplagan (Stockholm: Norstedts, 1988), pp. 298–9.Google Scholar
  7. 12.
    Hakan Stromberg, ‘NormprGvning i nyare rattspraxis,’ Forvaltnings- rdttslig Tidskrift, Vol. 51 (1988): 121–43.Google Scholar
  8. 13.
    Gunnar Heckscher, The Welfare State and Beyond: Success and Problems in Scandinavia (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984), pp. 27ff.Google Scholar
  9. On the limited nature of Swedish liberalism, see Goran B. Nilsson, ‘Swedish Liberalism at Mid-Nineteenth Century,’ in Steven Koblik, Sweden’s Development from Poverty to Affluence (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1975), pp. 141–63.Google Scholar
  10. 14.
    H. M. Enzensberger, Svensk Host (Stockholm: Dagens Nyheter, 1982), pp. 29–35.Google Scholar
  11. 15.
    Nils Stjemquist, in Rune Lavin (ed.), Om lagradsgranskning (Jurist forlaget i Lund, 1987), pp. 32, 47, 51.Google Scholar
  12. 16.
    Erik Anners (ed.), ‘Konstitutionell demokrati eller majoritets diktatur,’ in Demokratin, Rattsakerheten och Beskattningen (Stockholm: Norstedts, 1988), p. 26.Google Scholar
  13. 17.
    For a brief treatment of the concept of legal culture, see Lawrence M. Friedman, American Law: An Introduction (New York: Norton, 1984), pp. 6–7, and Henry W. Ehrmann, Comparative Legal Cultures (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1976).Google Scholar
  14. 19.
    See Mauro Cappelletti and William Cohen, Comparative Constitutional Law: Cases and Materials (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1979), pp. 73ff.Google Scholar
  15. 21.
    See the Rattssakerhets grupp symposium which was held in Stockholm on March 12, 1987, in Erik Anners, Demokratin, rattssakerketen och beskattningen, pp. 22–6. See also Aleksander Peczenik, ‘Fòrsvara ràttsstaten’ in Svensk tidskrift, No. 6 (1988): 294–8, and Brita Sundberg-Weitman, Rättsstaten ater (Stockholm: Norstedt, 1984).Google Scholar
  16. 27.
    Joseph B. Board, ‘The Courts in Sweden,’ in Jerold Waltman and Kenneth Holland (eds), The Political Role of Law Courts in Modern Democracies (London: Macmillan, 1988), pp. 195–6.Google Scholar
  17. On the judicial career in general, see Lotti Rydberg, Domarkarriàren (Stockholm: Juristforlaget, 1988).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kenneth M. Holland 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph B. Board

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations