Abstract
For poetry in English, prepositions may be the most private parts of speech. They carry no manifest freight of reference, and thus cannot easily be misapplied for figuration without falling into the kind of solecism which even far-fetched tropes escape. For example, ‘Give it back of me’ — for ‘Give it back to me’ — sounds only like bungled English, whereas ‘Give her back to the grass’, say, or the notorious para-predication of Chomsky’s, ‘colourless green ideas sleep furiously’, would not. They would only sound figurative. (In this latter instance as Frank Kermode recently pointed out in the instance of an exemplary phrase used by John Searle (Kermode 1986), there are allusive dimensions to the total rhetorical activity of the sentence.) The romance of nouns, then of verbs, at various periods in the history of meditative grammar has been discussed by linguists,1 and the implicit non-literal predications of adjectives and adverbs are acknowedged by rhetorical theory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1991 Margaret Tudeau-Clayton and Martin Warner
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hollander, J. (1991). Of ‘of’: The Romance of a Preposition. In: Tudeau-Clayton, M., Warner, M. (eds) Addressing Frank Kermode. Warwick Studies in the European Humanities. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11753-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11753-6_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-11755-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-11753-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)