Skip to main content

Family Labour Supply Decisions in Rural Peru

  • Chapter
Issues in Contemporary Economics

Part of the book series: International Economic Association Series ((IEA))

  • 38 Accesses

Abstract

Raising rural incomes and increasing agricultural production are two of the primary challenges facing policy-makers in developing countries. While increasing agricultural production calls for policies that raise the return to agricultural activities, higher rural incomes could be achieved by raising both agricultural and non-agricultural returns. The resulting impacts on incomes and agricultural production depend heavily upon the family labour supply responses in both agricultural and non-agricultural activities. Because raising the return of one work activity relative to the other can induce a reallocation of labour between activities, both sectors must be considered jointly. For instance, if an increase in agricultural production comes at the expense of work in non-agricultural activities rather than leisure, the net effect on rural incomes may be negligible. If, at the same time, these policies result in a decline in agricultural output, then the cost of this decline needs to be considered in the evaluation of the policies.

We would like to thank Menno Pradhan and David Zimmerman for their excellent assistance in this research project. This paper has benefited greatly from comments by Angus Deaton, James Heckman, Jim Hosek, Costas Meghir, Mark Pitt, T. Paul Schultz, Jacques van der Gaag, Wim Vijverberg, Finis Welch, and seminar participants at Rand, UCLA, Yale University, and the World Bank.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amemiya, T. (1974) ‘Multivariate Regression and Simultaneous Equation Models when the Dependent Variables are Truncated Normal’, Econometrica, vol. 42, pp. 999–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashenfelter, O. and Heckman, J. (1974) ‘The Estimation of Income and Substitution Effects in a Model of Family Labor Supply’, Econometrica, vol. 42, pp. 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnum, H. and Squire, L. (1979) ‘An Econometric Application of the Theory of the Farm-Household’, Journal of Development Economics, vol. 6, pp. 79–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, D. (1988) ‘Household Composition and Labor Demand: Testing for Rural Labor Market Efficiency’, Industrial Relations Section Working Paper no 244, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G. (1987) ‘A Simplified Approach to M-Estimation with Applications to Two-Stage Estimators’, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 34, pp. 373–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glewwe, P. (1987) ‘The Distribution of Welfare in Peru 1985–86’, Living Standards Measurement Study Working Paper no 42, World Bank, Washington. DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. and Green, C. (1984) ‘Estimating the Parameters of a Household Production Function with Joint Products’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 66, pp. 277–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronau, R. (1977) ‘Leisure, Home Production and Work: The Theory of the Allocation of Time’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 85, pp. 1099–1123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J. and Ruud, P. (1984) ‘Family Labor Supply and Taxes’, American Economic Review, vol. 74, pp. 242–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, W. E. and Lange, M. (1989) ‘Off-farm Work Decisions of Husbands and Wives: Joint Decision Making’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 71, pp. 471–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kooreman, P. and Kapteyn, A. (1987) ‘A Disaggregated Analysis of the Allocation of Time within a Household’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 95, pp. 223–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S. (1983) Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, R. (1978) ‘Note on the Uniqueness of the Maximum Likelihood Estimator of the Tobit Model’, Econometrica, vol. 46, pp. 1211–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, R. A. and Wachter, M. (1975) ‘The Relevance of the Household Production Function and Its Implications for the Allocation of Time’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 83, pp. 255–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ransom, M. (1987) ‘An Empirical Model of Discrete and Continuous Choice in Family Labor Supply’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 69, pp. 463–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M. (1978) ‘Rural Wages, Labor Supply and Land Reform: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis’, American Economic Review, vol. 68, pp. 847–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, I., Squire, L. and Strauss, J. (eds) (1986) Agricultural Household Models: Extensions, Applications and Policy, (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press for the World Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, D. (1981) ‘An Economic Interpretation of Parameter Constraints in a Simultaneous Equations Model with Limited Dependent Variables’, International Economic Review, vol. 22, pp. 731–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Marc Nerlove

Copyright information

© 1991 International Economic Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gertler, P.J., Newman, J.L. (1991). Family Labour Supply Decisions in Rural Peru. In: Nerlove, M. (eds) Issues in Contemporary Economics. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11576-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics