Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Cambridge Commonwealth Series ((CAMCOM))

Abstract

Two contrasting comments are needed as preface to any balanced discussion of the role of the Indian Head of State. India has been more successful than have most Asian and African nations at maintaining the strength of political institutions, and its capacity for political regeneration — the rebuilding of weakened institutions and the creation of new institutions and accommodations1 — is probably unmatched in the Third World. Nevertheless, the predominant theme in Indian politics since the early 1970s has been political decay, a decline in the capacity of political institutions to respond creatively or even adequately to pressures from society. This chapter will often dwell on the second of these points, but it should not be taken to imply that the first is invalid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See J. Manor, ‘Politics: Ambiguity, Disillusionment and Ferment’ in M.M. Bouton and P. Oldenburg (eds.) India Briefing, 1988, New York, 1988, pp. 25–26 and J. Manor, ‘The State of Governance’ in S. Roy (ed.), The Political Economy of India, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P.L. Mathur, Role of Governor in Non-Congress States, Jaipur, 1988, chapter 5.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D.C. Wadhwa, Repromulgation of Ordinances, Pune, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See for example, the case of B.K. Nehru, Governor of Kashmir, who was emboldened to resist pressure to dismiss the state government because of his close family ties to Mrs. Gandhi. He was eventually transferred to another state, and a replacement was found who performed the deed. I. Malhotra, Indira Gandhi: A Personal and Political Biography, London, 1989, pp. 294–96.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D.A. Low, ‘Emergencies and Elections in India’ in G. Martell (ed.), Studies in British Imperial History, London, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See especially, B.D. Dua, Presidential Rule in India, 1950–1974, New Delhi, 1979, and B.D. Dua, ‘India: A Study in the Pathology of a Federal System’, Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, November, 1981, pp. 257–75. See also, Mathur, Role of Governor…; D.V. Verney, ‘The Limits of Political Manipulation: The Role of the Governors in India’s ‘Administrative Federalism’, 1950–1984’, Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, July, 1986, pp. 169–96; D.V. Verney, The Double Role of the Indian Governors:Kashmir and Andhra Pradesh, 1983–84 in Low (ed.), Constitutional Heads, pp. 198–217; B.D. Dua, ‘Federalism or Patrimonialism: The Making and Unmaking of Chief Ministers in India’, Asian Survey, August, 1985, pp. 793–804;

    Google Scholar 

  7. and A. Ray, Federal Politics and Government, Delhi, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H.M. Seervai, Constitutional Law of India, volume 2, 3rd ed., Bombay, 1984, p. 2720.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Gopal, Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume Two, 1947–1956, London, 1979, pp. 77 and 94. The quotation is from p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Gopal, Radhakrishnan: A Biography, Delhi, 1989, p.356.

    Google Scholar 

  11. N.S. Reddy, Without Fear or Favour, New Delhi, 1989, chapter 5.

    Google Scholar 

  12. W.H. Morris-Jones, The Government and Politics of India, London and New Delhi, 1971, pp. 119–20.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See also M. Brecher, Succession in India: A Study in Decision-Making, London, 1966, chapters 3, 6 and 8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. For the Supreme Court ruling, see K.B. Nambyar (ed.) Supplementary Supreme Court Reports, 1971, Delhi, 1971, p. 46. I am grateful to K.N. Bhat, senior Supreme Court advocate, for this information — interview, New Delhi, 27 November 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. I. Malhotra, Indira Gandhi: A Personal and Political Biography, London, 1989, p. 169.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. Gopal, Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume Two, 1947–1956, London, 1979, p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See for example, Mathur, Role of Governor, pp. 177–82 and, in a slightly different but relevant context, A.G. Noorani, The Presidential System: An Indian Debate, New Delhi, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. Austin, The Indian Constitution: Cornerstone of a Nation, Oxford, 1966,

    Google Scholar 

  19. and R.H. Retzlaff, ‘The Constituent Assembly of India and the Problem of Indian Unity’, Cornell University Ph.D. thesis, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1991 David Butler and D. A. Low

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Manor, J. (1991). India. In: Butler, D., Low, D.A. (eds) Sovereigns and Surrogates. Cambridge Commonwealth Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11565-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics