Advertisement

Competitive Tendering and Bidding

  • Lyn C. Thomas

Abstract

The public sector in the UK has been under considerable government pressure in the last ten years to become more efficient and to hive off some of its activities to private industry. In particular the Conservative governments of the 1980s committed themselves to contracting out public sector functions wherever possible. There were three major pushes for this. In 1980, the pressure for contracting out came from a demand to cut the numbers employed by the public sector. Thus local authority direct labour organisations were forced to compete with private firms for construction and maintenance work. In the mid-1980s the need for value for money led to more services being allocated by contract tendering. These included refuse collection and catering and cleaning in schools and hospital catering, cleaning and laundry services. In the defence industry, refitting of warships as well as catering, cleaning and guarding of installations were put out to tender as opposed to being done in-house or by negotiated contracts. Third, the Local Government Act 1988 required that from 1 August 1989 local authorities had to put contracts out to tender for six different types of work, including cleaning services and school catering. This has led to a major reorganisation of council services into quasi-companies — Direct Service Organisations — that can then bid for such contracts.

Keywords

Bidding Strategy Functional Perspective Bidding Process English Auction Final Price 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Centre for Local Economic Studies, Seconds Out, Round Two: The First Round of Compulsory Competitive Tendering (CLES Research Study Series No. 6, 1990).Google Scholar
  2. Engelbrecht-Wiggins, R., ‘Auctions and Bidding Models: A Survey’, Management Science, Vol. 26 (1980), pp. 119–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. French, S., Decision Analysis (Chichester: Ellis Horwood, 1986).Google Scholar
  4. Friedman, L., ‘A Competitive Bidding Strategy’, Operations Research, Vol. 4 (1956), pp. 104–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gates, M., ‘Bidding Strategies and Probabilities’, Journal of the Construction Division of the American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 93 (1967), pp. 75–107.Google Scholar
  6. Griesmer, J.H. and Shubik, M., ‘Towards a Study of Bidding Processes. Part 3: Some Special Models’, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, Vol. 14 (1967), pp. 191–217.Google Scholar
  7. Griesmer, J.H., Levitan, R.E. and Shubik, M., ‘Towards a Study of Bidding Processes. Part 4: Games with Unknown Costs’, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, Vol. 14 (1967), pp. 415–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Institute of Personnel Management and Incomes Data Services, Public Sector Unit, Competitive Tendering in the Public Sector (Woking: IPM, 1986).Google Scholar
  9. King, M. and Mercer, A., ‘Note on a Conflict of Assumptions in Bidding Models’, European Journal of Operations Research, Vol. 32 (1987), pp. 462–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. King, M. and Mercer, A., ‘Recurrent Competitive Bidding’, European Journal of Operations Research, Vol. 33 (1988), pp. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Manchester City Council, The Price of Winning: Lessons from the First Round of Enforced Tendering, Contractors’ Audit Volume 3 (Manchester City Council, 1990).Google Scholar
  12. Rothkopf, M.H., ‘On Multiplicative Bidding Strategies’, Operations Research, Vol. 28 (1980), pp. 570–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Simmonds, K., ‘Competitive Bidding: Deciding the Best Combination of Non-price Features’, Operational Research Quarterly, Vol. 19 (1968), pp. 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stark, R.M. and Rothkopf, M.H., ‘Competitive Bidding, A Comprehensive Bibliography’, Operations Research, Vol. 27 (1979), pp. 364–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Thomas, L.C., Games, Theory and Applications (Chichester: Ellis Horwood, 1984).Google Scholar
  16. Thornton Baker Associates, Health Services Management (London: Nuffield Provincial Hospital Trust, 1984).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lyn C. Thomas

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations