• John Izod


Although several of Roeg’s films had been based on published work, the British gave more attention to the connections between Castaway and the book that preceded it than had previously been the case. In part this was because Lucy Irvine’s book had gone through some twenty paperback reprints in Britain by the time of the film’s release. In part it arose because the book was based on the writer’s experiences and Roeg deliberately cast actors who resembled Lucy Irvine and Gerald Kingsland, and sought to deal faithfully with the physical events of their twelve months’isolation.1 Beneath these factors lies a persistent fascination with a particular variant of pastoral myth. The Crusoe story still excites the British with its potent picture of a tropical and liberated alternative to life confined in drab cities. As Margaret Walters remarks, it sells holidays by the million, and just about everything else from drinks to tampons.2 Lucy Irvine and Gerald Kingsland boarded the myth in our time and tried to live it out. That they did so for reasons they did not fully understand when they set out makes it no less fascinating. Furthermore this modern version of the Crusoe adventure is fattened out with an account of a sexual liaison that went wrong, which gives the audience the additional pleasure of witnessing familiar domestic problems disrupting the exotic scene.


Lost City Conscious Mind Sexual Liaison Fantasy Life Pastoral Myth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 3.
    Terence Doyle, ‘Pages as Pictures’, Films and Filming 387 (December 1986) p.20.Google Scholar
  2. 8.
    C. G. Jung, Symbols of Transformation, The Collected Works, Vol. 5, (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981) p.89.Google Scholar
  3. 9.
    Erich Neumann, The Origins and History of Consciousness (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970) pp.5–11.Google Scholar
  4. 11.
    See C. G. Jung, Aion, The Collected Works, Vol. 9, 2, 2nd edn (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981) pp.249–50.Google Scholar
  5. 12.
    Virgil, The Aeneid, Book VIII, 407–53; Michael Grant, Roman Myths (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1971) p.60.Google Scholar
  6. 13.
    C. G. Jung, The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious, The Collected Works, Vol. 9, 1, 2nd edn (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1968) p.260.Google Scholar
  7. 15.
    Ovid, The Metamorphoses, tr. Mary M. Innes, (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1967) pp.227–8.Google Scholar
  8. 16.
    Andrew Marvell, ‘The Garden’, Stanzas 5–6, in The Poems, ed., Hugh Macdonald (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963) p.52.Google Scholar
  9. 17.
    For detailed discussion of Hermeticism in seventeenth century poetry see Maren-Sofie Röstvig, The Happy Man, Second edition, (Oslo: Norwegian Universities Press, 1962) Vol. 1, pp.152–72Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kenneth John Izod 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Izod
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Film and Media StudiesUniversity of StirlingUK

Personalised recommendations