Advertisement

Comments

  • Joseph G. Dawson
Part of the Studies in Military and Strategic History book series (SMSH)

Abstract

In his chapter, Edward Coffman helps counteract the view (advanced by Ronald Spector1 and others) that ‘Neither the Army nor the Navy was at all prepared for the kind of war they would have to fight’ in 1917–18. Coffman argues instead that most of the top US Army officers were well prepared for the major European war in which they participated. His thesis is supported by appropriate examples. Of particular value is his excellent description and analysis of the books and readings that were assigned to American officers who attended the Staff College at Fort Leavenworth and the Army War College. These reading assignments can be seen as part of the growing pattern in the US Army to rely on formal schooling of its officers, who came into the service from several sources — West Point, other military colleges, and by direct commission — in order to lay a common foundation among the officer corps. This common foundation, especially the schooling at Leavenworth, clearly improved the professionalism of American officers between 1903 and 1917.2

Keywords

West Pointer Staff College Officer Corps General Staff Army Officer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Ronald Spector, ‘You’re Not Going to Send Sailors Over There Are You?’: The American Search for An Alternative to the Western Front, 1916–1917’, Military Affairs, 36 (February 1972), p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Timothy K. Nenninger, The Leavenworth Schools and the Old Army: Education, Professionalism, and the Officer Corps of the United States Army, 1881–1918 (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1978), pp. 53–133.Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    James Kirby Martin and Mark Edward Lender, A Respectable Army: The Military Origins of the Republic, 1763–1789 (Arlington Heights, IL: Harlan Davidson, 1982), p. 47.Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    Harry L. Coles, The War of 1812 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965), p. 157.Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    James W. Pohl, ‘The Influence of Antoine Henri de Jomini on Winfield Scott’s Campaign in the Mexican War’, Southwestern Historical Quarterly, LXXVII (July 1973), pp. 85–110.Google Scholar
  6. 8.
    Jay Luvaas, The Military Legacy of the Civil War: The European Inheritance (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1959).Google Scholar
  7. 9.
    G. F. R. Henderson, Stonewall Jackson and the American Civil War (London: Longmans, Green, 1898).Google Scholar
  8. 10.
    James L. Stokesbury, A Short History of World War I (New York: William Morrow, 1981), p. 218Google Scholar
  9. Donald Smythe, Pershing: General of the Armies (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1986), pp. 69Google Scholar
  10. Russell F. Weigley, History of the United States Army (New York: Macmillan, 1967), pp. 387Google Scholar
  11. Harvey DeWeed, President Wilson Fights His War (New York: Macmillan, 1968), p. 202Google Scholar
  12. Allan R. Millett, ‘Cantigny’, in C. E. Hiller and W. A. Stofft, (eds), America’s First Battles (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1986), p. 160Google Scholar
  13. Lee Kennett, The A.E.F. ‘Through French Eyes’, Military Review, 52 (November 1972), pp. 5–7.Google Scholar
  14. 11.
    Maurice Matloff (ed.), American Military History (Washington: Office of the Chief of Military History/U.S. Government Printing Office, 1969), p. 347.Google Scholar
  15. 13.
    Harold and Margaret Sprout, The Rise of American Naval Power, 1776–1918 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1967), pp. 357–8.Google Scholar
  16. 14.
    Paolo E. Coletta, ‘Josephus Daniels’, in Coletta (ed.), American Secretaries of the Navy, 2 vols (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 1980), II, pp. 525–81.Google Scholar
  17. 15.
    David F. Trask, Captains and Cabinets: Anglo-American Naval Relations, 1917–1918 (Colombia: University of Missouri Press, 1972), p. 46.Google Scholar
  18. 16.
    Paolo E. Coletta, Admiral Bradley A. Fiske and the American Navy (Lawrence: The Regents Press of Kansas, 1979), pp. 104.Google Scholar
  19. 17.
    James L. Abrahamson, American Arms for a New Century: The Making of a Great Military Power (New York: Free Press, 1981), p. 160.Google Scholar
  20. 19.
    Franklin D. Roosevelt to Eleanor Roosevelt, 5 August 1914, in Elliot Roosevelt (ed.), FDR: His Personal Letters (4 vols, New York: Duell, Sloan & Pierce, 1947–50), II, p. 243.Google Scholar
  21. 20.
    Mary Klachko and David F. Trask, Admiral William Shepherd Benson: First Chief of Naval Operations (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 1987), pp. 27–62.Google Scholar
  22. David F. Trask, ‘William S. Benson’, in Robert Love (ed.), The Chiefs of Naval Operations (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 1980), pp. 3–22.Google Scholar
  23. 21.
    John Patrick Finnegan, Against the Spector of a Dragon: The Campaign for American Preparedness, 1914–1917 (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1974), pp. 162–3.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Military Studies Institute of Texas A & M University 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph G. Dawson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations