Skip to main content

The Junkies’ Doctors and the London Drug Scene in the 1960s: Some Remembered Fragments

  • Chapter

Abstract

The Second Report of the Interdepartmental Committee on Drug Addiction, the Brain Report, was published at the end of Novermber 1965. Its curiously limited feel was partly due to its narrow terms of reference. While it was entitled Drug Addiction, its concern was almost exclusively with the regulations controlling prescribing of heroin and cocaine for addicts. It is true that it did make one passing reference to the wider social context in the memorable words of paragraph 40:

Witnesses have told us that there are numerous clubs, many in the West End of London, enjoying a vogue among young people who can find in them such diversions as modern music and all night dancing. In such places it is known that some young people have indulged in stimulant drugs of the amphetamine type.3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kramer, John C., in D. E. Smith and G. R. Gay (eds), It’s So Good, Don’t Even Try It Once: Perspectives on Heroin (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1952) p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  2. House of Commons, 7 May 1968, col. 156.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Drug Addiction, Second Report of the Interdepartmental Committee (HMSO, 1956) para. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schur, E. M., Narcotic Addiction in Britain and America: the Impact of Public Policy (Tavistock: 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Spear, H. B., ‘The Growth of Heroin Addiction in the UK’, British Journal of Addiction, 64 (1969) pp. 245–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Drug Addiction, Report of the Interdepartmental Committee (HMSO, 1961) para. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Time and Tide, 15 June 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Matthew, Henry, in British Journal of Addiction, 61 (1966) p. 171.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Report of the UN (1964) para. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jeffery, C. G., cited in M. M. Glatt and J. Marks (eds), The Dependence Phenomenon (Lancaster: MTP Press, 1982) p. 57, H.B.

    Google Scholar 

  11. House of Commons, 7 May 1968, col. 156.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A physician, ‘Narcotic Addiction and the Brain Committee Report’, Anarchy, 60 (Feb. 1966) p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cited ibid p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Downes, David M., The Delinquent Solution (Routledge, 1966) p. 215.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ibid p. 135.

    Google Scholar 

  16. East London Advertisere, 11 June 1965. For the wider background see K. Leech, ‘The East London Drug Traffic’, Social Work, 24 (2) (Apr. 1966) pp. 23–7.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bentel, David J., and David E. Smith, ‘The Year of the Middle Class Junkie’, California’s Health, April 1971, pp. 1–5; Newsweek, 5 July 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  18. The Times, 9 Nov. 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Leech, Kenneth, ‘Danger on the Drug Scene’, Daily Telegraph, 8 Dec. 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Spear, H. B., and M. M. Glatt, The Influence of Canadian Addicts on Heroin Addiction in the UK’, British Journal of Addiction, 66 (1971) pp. 141–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Frankau, I. M., and P. M. Stanwell, ‘The Treatment of Drug Addiction’, Lancet, 24 December 1960, pp. 1377–9; I. M. Frankau, ‘Treatment in England of Canadian Patients Addicted to Narcotic Drugs’, Canadian Medical Association Journal, 90 (8 Feb. 1964) pp. 421–4.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Frankau and Stanwell, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  23. The Sun, 11 Nov. 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Daily Mail, ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  25. The Guardian, 19 Nov. 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hawes, A. J., ‘Goodbye Junkies’, The Lancet, 1 Aug. 1970, pp. 258–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. The Observer, 12 Sept. 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  28. The Times, 15 Nov. 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Circular letters from Inner London Executive Council, 7 and 18 July 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Circular letters from Inner London Executive Council, 7 and 18 July 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tripp, Margaret, ‘Who speaks for Petro?’, Drugs and Society, 3 (2) (November 1973) pp. 12–17. On Petro see K. Leech, ‘John Petro, the Junkies’ Doctor’, New Society, 11 June 1981, pp. 430–2.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Daily Mail and the Sun, 7 July 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tripp, op. cit., p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  34. ‘Narcotics and Bureaucracy’, Sunday Times, 20 Nov. 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  35. House of Commons, 3 July 1966, col. 1239.

    Google Scholar 

  36. The Times, 3 Aug. 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Smith, B. A. R., to K. Leech, 19 Aug. 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  38. The Times, 26 April 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  39. House of Lords, 20 June 1967, cols 1271–5.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ibid col. 1316.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ibid, 5 July 1967, cols 720–753.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ibid, 19 July 1967, written answer.

    Google Scholar 

  43. House of Commons, 25 July 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  44. The Times, 15 Jan. 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Jessel, Stephen, ‘Measures Urged to Fight Drugs’, ibid., 25 Jan. 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  46. House of Commons, 30 Jan. 1968, cols 260–1.

    Google Scholar 

  47. ‘World in Action’, Granada TV, 12 Feb. 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mitchell, Alex, ‘Minister’s Addict Clinics are just a Myth’, Sunday Times, 18 Feb. 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  49. House of Commons, 7 May 1968, col. 171.

    Google Scholar 

  50. For a more detailed account of the Soho youth culture in this period see K. Leech, Keep the Faith Baby (SPCK, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  51. The Amphetamines and Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD), Report by the Advisory Committee on Drug Dependence, HMSO, 1970, para. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  52. For example, The Guardian, 9 July 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  53. ‘Is Mafia on the Move?’, Evening Standard, 2 June 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  54. The Times, 27 June 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Burr, Angela, in International Journal of Addictions, 21 (1) (1986) p. 86.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Jenkins, Simon, ‘How We Beat Heroin’, Evening Standard, 3 Apr. 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Spear, H. B., in Glatt and Marks, op. cit., p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Parker, Howard, et al. Drug Misuse in Wirral (University of Liverpool: 1986); and ‘Heroin and the Young’, New Society, 24 Jan. 1986, pp. 142–3.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Trebach, Arnold, ‘Giving Addicts the Push Off, The Guardian, 3 Dec. 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1991 David K. Whynes and Philip T. Bean

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leech, K. (1991). The Junkies’ Doctors and the London Drug Scene in the 1960s: Some Remembered Fragments. In: Whynes, D.K., Bean, P.T. (eds) Policing and Prescribing. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11451-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics