Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Nursing Models in Action Series ((NMAS))

  • 110 Accesses

Abstract

It was because of this belief that Roper, Logan and Tierney wrote The Elements of Nursing in which their nursing model was first presented. One decade later, theorists and scholars continue to debate these issues. Hanucharurnkul (1989) argues that there is still no single nursing paradigm to direct practice, education or research, but only a range of phenomena related to nursing which may be interpreted in many different ways. Botha (1989) defines a paradigm as a ‘group commitment to a constellation of beliefs which represent a particular way of viewing the world — in this case a discipline’. Flaskerud and Halloran (1980) present four phenomena related to nursing which appear to have been accepted as a paradigm of nursing by other nursing theorists: these are the concepts of man as the recipient of nursing care, health, the environment, and nursing. Fawcett (1989) asserts that these phenomena are central concepts which together constitute a metaparadigm of nursing. She describes a metaparadigm as ‘a global perspective of a discipline’, and quotes the following statement of Donaldson and Crowley (1978) as the major proposition of nursing’s metaparadigm because it clearly emphasises the relationship of the four concepts:

Nursing studies the wholeness or health of humans, recognising that humans are in continuous interaction with their environment.

The complexity and specialisation of nursing today make it more necessary than ever for the elements of nursing to be identified and understood.

(Roper et al. 1980)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Aggleton, P. and Chalmers, H. 1987. Models of nursing, nursing practice and nurse education. In Journal of Advanced Nursing, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binnie, A., Bond, S. et al. 1984. A Systematic Approach to Nursing Care. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botha, M.E. 1989. Theory development in perspective: the role of conceptual frameworks and models in theory development. In Journal of Advanced Nursing, 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassons, J. 1980. Dying — the greatest adventure of my life. London: Christian Medical Fellowship.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. 1988. Framework for care. In Nursing Times, 84(35).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. 1986. A model for health visiting. In Kershaw and Salvage 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. and Bishop, J. 1988. Model-making. In Nursing Times, 84(27).

    Google Scholar 

  • Colledge, M. M. and Jones, D. (eds) 1979. Readings in Nursing. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, S. K. and Crowley, D. M. 1978. The discipline of nursing. In Nursing Outlook, 26. (Quoted in Fawcett 1989.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. 1950. Childhood and Society, 1st edn. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, E. 1986. Exploring the issues. In Kershaw and Salvage 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, J. 1989. Analysis and Evaluation of Conceptual Models of Nursing, 2nd edn. Philadelphia: Davis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaskerud, J. H. and Halloran, E.J. 1980. Areas of agreement in nursing theory development. In Advances in Nursing Science, 3(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanucharurnkul, S. 1989. Comparative analysis of Orem’s and King’s theories. In Journal of Advanced Nursing, 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, V. 1969. Basic Principles of Nursing Care. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. 1986. On maps and models. In Senior Nurse, 15(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jourard, S. M. 1964. The Transparent Self. New York: Van Nostrand. (Quoted in Roper 1976.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kershaw, B. and Salvage, J. (eds) 1986. Models for Nursing. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubler-Ross, E. 1969. On Death and Dying. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T. 1988. Leaping the chasm between nursing theory and practice. In Journal of Advanced Nursing, 13, 345–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane, J. 1980. Essays on Nursing. (Project papers based on working papers of the Royal Commission of NHS, No. RC2.) London: Kings Fund Centre. (Cited in Binnie et al. 1984.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. 1954. Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meleis, A. I. 1985. Theoretical Nursing: development and practice. Pennsylvania, USA: Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minshull, J., Ross, K. and Turner, J. 1986. The human-needs model of nursing. In Journal of Advanced Nursing, 11, 643–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Health Economics, 1971. Prospects in health. London: OHE. (Quoted in Roper et al. 1985.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, A. 1983. The Clinical Nursing Unit. London: Heinemann Medical Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, N. 1976. Clinical Experience in Nurse Education. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, N. 1979. Nursing based on a model for living. In Colledge and Jones 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, N., Logan, W. and Tierney, A. 1980. The Elements of Nursing. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, N., Logan, W. and Tierney, A. 1981. Learning to Use the Process of Nursing. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, N., Logan, W. and Tierney, A. 1983a. Problems or needs? In Nursing Mirror, June 8th.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, N., Logan, W. and Tierney, A. 1983b. Using a Model for Nursing. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, N., Logan, W. and Tierney, A. 1985. The Elements of Nursing. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D., Henley, B. and Zeitz, L. 1964. The Elderly Ambulant Patient. New York: Macmillan. (Quoted in Roper 1976.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibodeau, J. A. 1983. Nursing Models: analysis and evaluation. Monterey, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, A. 1984. The first step of the nursing process. In Binnie et al. 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, R. W. 1952. Distinctive attributes of education for the professions. In Social Work Journal, 33. (Quoted in Roper 1976.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. O. and Nicholson, R. 1980. Criteria for evaluating nursing process models. In Nurse Educator, 5(5). (Quoted in Fawcett 1989.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilding, C, Wells, M. and Wilson, J. 1988. A model for family care. In Nursing Times, 84(15), 38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. 1972. Philosophy and Educational Research. Windsor: National Foundation for Educational Research in England and Wales. (Quoted in Roper 1976.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. G. 1986. Building and Using a Model of Nursing. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1991 Charleen Newton

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Newton, C. (1991). Analysis and evaluation. In: The Roper-Logan-Tierney Model in Action. Nursing Models in Action Series. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11418-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11418-4_9

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-52134-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-11418-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics